Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Sign problem in tensor network contraction

Published 29 Apr 2024 in quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, cond-mat.str-el, and physics.comp-ph | (2404.19023v2)

Abstract: We investigate how the computational difficulty of contracting tensor networks depends on the sign structure of the tensor entries. Using results from computational complexity, we observe that the approximate contraction of tensor networks with only positive entries has lower complexity. This raises the question how this transition in computational complexity manifests itself in the hardness of different contraction schemes. We pursue this question by studying random tensor networks with varying bias towards positive entries. First, we consider contraction via Monte Carlo sampling, and find that the transition from hard to easy occurs when the entries become predominantly positive; this can be seen as a tensor network manifestation of the Quantum Monte Carlo sign problem. Second, we analyze the commonly used contraction based on boundary tensor networks. Its performance is governed by the amount of correlations (entanglement) in the tensor network. Remarkably, we find that the transition from hard to easy (i.e., from a volume law to a boundary law scaling of entanglement) occurs already for a slight bias towards a positive mean, and the earlier the larger the bond dimension is. This is in contrast to both expectations and the behavior found in Monte Carlo contraction. We gain further insight into this early transition from the study of an effective statmech model. Finally, we investigate the computational difficulty of computing expectation values of tensor network wavefunctions, i.e., PEPS, where we find that the complexity of entanglement-based contraction always remains low. We explain this by providing a local transformation which maps PEPS expectation values to a positive-valued tensor network. This not only provides insight into the origin of the observed boundary law entanglement scaling, but also suggests new approaches towards PEPS contraction based on positive decompositions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  2. M. C. Bañuls, Tensor Network Algorithms: A Route Map, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 173 (2023), arXiv:2205.10345 .
  3. F. Barahona, On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models, J. Phys. A 15, 3241 (1982).
  4. M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational Complexity and Fundamental Limitations to Fermionic Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0408370 .
  5. L. Stockmeyer, The complexity of approximate counting, in Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC ’83, STOC ’83 (ACM Press, 1983).
  6. J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev, The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem, SIAM Journal of Computing 35, 1070 (2006), quant-ph/0406180 .
  7. H. C. Jiang, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Accurate determination of tensor network state of quantum lattice models in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008), arXiv:0806.3719 .
  8. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Renormalization algorithms for Quantum-Many Body Systems in two and higher dimensions,   (2004), cond-mat/0407066 .
  9. J. Gray and G. K.-L. Chan, Hyper-optimized approximate contraction of tensor networks with arbitrary geometry, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011009 (2024), 2206.07044v2 .
  10. T. Grover and M. P. A. Fisher, Entanglement and the Sign Structure of Quantum States, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042308 (2015), 1412.3534v1 .
  11. R. Levy and B. K. Clark, Entanglement Entropy Transitions with Random Tensor Networks,   (2021), arXiv:2108.02225 .
  12. B. Collins and S. Matsumoto, On some properties of orthogonal Weingarten functions, Journal of Mathematical Physics 50, 113516 (2009), arXiv:0903.5143 .
  13. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019), arXiv:1808.05953 .
  14. Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020), arXiv:1908.04305 .
  15. P. Hayden, D. W. Leung, and A. Winter, Aspects of Generic Entanglement, Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 95–117 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0407049 .
  16. G. Aubrun, S. J. Szarek, and D. Ye, Entanglement Thresholds for Random Induced States, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 67, 129–171 (2013), arXiv:1106.2264 .
  17. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor Network Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180405 (2015), arXiv:1412.0732 .
  18. M. C. Bañuls, private communication.
  19. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6, 15 (2015), 1404.0686v2 .
  20. A. Barvinok, Computing the permanent of (some) complex matrices, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 16, 329 (2016), arXiv:1405.1303 .
  21. L. Eldar and S. Mehraban, Approximating the permanent of a random matrix with vanishing mean, in 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE, 2018) pp. 23–34, arXiv:1711.09457 .
  22. J. Eisert, Computational Difficulty of Global Variations in the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 260501 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0609051 .
  23. N. Schuch, I. Cirac, and F. Verstraete, The computational difficulty of finding MPS ground states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 250501 (2008b), arXiv:0802.3351 .
  24. Z. Landau, U. Vazirani, and T. Vidick, A polynomial time algorithm for the ground state of one-dimensional gapped local Hamiltonians, Nature Phys. 11, 566 (2015), arXiv:1307.5143 .
Citations (6)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 24 likes about this paper.