Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning

Published 6 May 2024 in cs.LG | (2405.03342v3)

Abstract: Causal effect estimation under networked interference is an important but challenging problem. Available parametric methods are limited in their model space, while previous semiparametric methods, e.g., leveraging neural networks to fit only one single nuisance function, may still encounter misspecification problems under networked interference without appropriate assumptions on the data generation process. To mitigate bias stemming from misspecification, we propose a novel doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference, by adapting the targeted learning technique to the training of neural networks. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting and establish the condition under which an estimator achieves double robustness. Based on the condition, we devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of our designed estimator, revealing a faster convergence rate compared to a single nuisance model. Extensive experimental results on two real-world networks with semisynthetic data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed estimators.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. A new approach to hierarchical data analysis: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for the causal effect of a cluster-level exposure. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 28(6):1761–1780, 2019. doi: 10.1177/0962280218774936. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280218774936. PMID: 29921160.
  2. Causal inference from observational studies with clustered interference, with application to a cholera vaccine study. Annals of Applied Statistics, 14(3):1432–1448, 2020.
  3. Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov):463–482, 2002.
  4. Generalization bound for estimating causal effects from observational network data. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’23, pp.  163–172, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400701245. doi: 10.1145/3583780.3614892. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3583780.3614892.
  5. Beyond the cox hazard ratio: A targeted learning approach to survival analysis in a cardiovascular outcome trial application. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 15(3):524–539, 2023. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2023.2173644. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2023.2173644.
  6. Chin, A. Regression adjustments for estimating the global treatment effect in experiments with interference. Journal of Causal Inference, 7(2):20180026, 2019.
  7. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  8. Causal inference in coupled human and natural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12):5311–5318, 2019.
  9. Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(534):901–918, 2021.
  10. Learning individual causal effects from networked observational data. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp.  232–240, 2020.
  11. Demystifying statistical learning based on efficient influence functions. The American Statistician, 76(3):292–304, 2022a. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2021.2021984. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2021.2021984.
  12. Demystifying statistical learning based on efficient influence functions. The American Statistician, 76(3):292–304, 2022b.
  13. Huang, J. Z. Local asymptotics for polynomial spline regression. The Annals of Statistics, 31(5):1600 – 1635, 2003. doi: 10.1214/aos/1065705120. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1065705120.
  14. Varying-coefficient models and basis function approximations for the analysis of repeated measurements. Biometrika, 89(1):111–128, 2002.
  15. Polynomial spline estimation and inference for varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Statistica Sinica, pp.  763–788, 2004.
  16. Estimating causal effects on networked observational data via representation learning. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp.  852–861, 2022.
  17. Generalization bounds and representation learning for estimation of potential outcomes and causal effects, 2021.
  18. Non-parametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 79(4):1229–1245, 2017.
  19. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  20. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
  21. Estimating the Comparative Effectiveness of Feeding Interventions in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Demonstration of Longitudinal Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 186(12):1370–1379, 06 2017. ISSN 0002-9262. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx213. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx213.
  22. Estimating causal effects of hiv prevention interventions with interference in network-based studies among people who inject drugs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.04865, 2021.
  23. Nonparametric doubly robust estimation of causal effect on networks in observational studies. Stat, 12(1):e549, 2023.
  24. On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference. Biometrika, 103(4):829–842, 2016.
  25. Deconfounding with networked observational data in a dynamic environment. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp.  166–174, 2021.
  26. Learning causal effects on hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.  1202–1212, 2022.
  27. Causal inference under networked interference and intervention policy enhancement. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  3700–3708. PMLR, 2021.
  28. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects in network-based observational studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00230, 2023.
  29. Vcnet and functional targeted regularization for learning causal effects of continuous treatments. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  30. Varying coefficient neural network with functional targeted regularization for estimating continuous treatment effects. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=RmB-88r9dL.
  31. Adjusting for unmeasured spatial confounding with distance adjusted propensity score matching. Biostatistics, 20(2):256–272, 2019.
  32. Spillover effect in promotion: Evidence from video game publishers and esports tournaments. Journal of Business Research, 118:262–270, 2020.
  33. Schumaker, L. Spline functions: basic theory. Cambridge university press, 2007.
  34. Adapting neural networks for the estimation of treatment effects. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  35. Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 8(1), 2012. doi: doi:10.1515/1557-4679.1370. URL https://doi.org/10.1515/1557-4679.1370.
  36. Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2(1), 2006. doi: doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1043. URL https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1043.
  37. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data, volume 4. Springer, 2011.
  38. Using embeddings to correct for unobserved confounding in networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  39. Variable selection in nonparametric varying-coefficient models for analysis of repeated measurements. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484):1556–1569, 2008.
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.