Early Fault-Tolerant Quantum Algorithms in Practice: Application to Ground-State Energy Estimation
Abstract: We investigate the feasibility of early fault-tolerant quantum algorithms focusing on ground-state energy estimation problems. In particular, we examine the computation of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the spectral measure of a Hamiltonian and the identification of its discontinuities. Scaling these methods to larger system sizes reveals three key challenges: the smoothness of the CDF for large supports, the lack of tight lower bounds on the overlap with the true ground state, and the difficulty of preparing high-quality initial states. To address these challenges, we propose a signal processing approach to find these estimates automatically, in the regime where the quality of the initial state is unknown. Rather than aiming for exact ground-state energy, we advocate for improving classical estimates by targeting the low-energy support of the initial state. Additionally, we provide quantitative resource estimates, demonstrating a constant-factor improvement in the number of samples required to detect a specified change in CDF. Our numerical experiments, conducted on a 26-qubit fully connected Heisenberg model, leverage a truncated density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) initial state with a low bond dimension. The results show that the predictions from the quantum algorithm align closely with the DMRG-converged energies at larger bond dimensions while requiring several orders of magnitude fewer samples than theoretical estimates suggest. These findings underscore that CDF-based quantum algorithms are a practical and resource-efficient alternative to quantum phase estimation, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios.
- J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev, in FSTTCS 2004: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005) pp. 372–383.
- A. Uvarov, J. D. Biamonte, and D. Yudin, Variational quantum eigensolver for frustrated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075104 (2020).
- U. Azad and H. Singh, Quantum chemistry calculations using energy derivatives on quantum computers, Chemical Physics 558, 111506 (2022).
- S. Sahoo, U. Azad, and H. Singh, Quantum phase recognition using quantum tensor networks, The European Physical Journal Plus 137, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03587-6 (2022).
- D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042303 (2015).
- E. R. Anschuetz and B. T. Kiani, Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps, Nature Communications 13, 7760 (2022).
- A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem, arXiv e-prints (1995), arXiv:quant-ph/9511026 [quant-ph] .
- J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- L. Lin and Y. Tong, Heisenberg-limited ground-state energy estimation for early fault-tolerant quantum computers, PRX Quantum 3, 10.1103/prxquantum.3.010318 (2022).
- R. D. Somma, Quantum eigenvalue estimation via time series analysis, New Journal of Physics 21, 123025 (2019).
- O. Kiss, M. Grossi, and A. Roggero, Quantum error mitigation for fourier moment computation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13048 (2024).
- K. Wan, M. Berta, and E. T. Campbell, A randomized quantum algorithm for statistical phase estimation, Physical Review Letters 129, 030503 (2022), arXiv:2110.12071 [quant-ph].
- Y. Dong, L. Lin, and Y. Tong, Ground-state preparation and energy estimation on early fault-tolerant quantum computers via quantum eigenvalue transformation of unitary matrices, PRX Quantum 3, 040305 (2022).
- D. Gottesman and S. Irani, in 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, 2009) pp. 95–104.
- D. Nagaj, Local hamiltonians in quantum computation, arXiv preprint (2008), arXiv:0808.2117 [quant-ph] .
- T. Cubitt and A. Montanaro, Complexity classification of local hamiltonian problems, SIAM Journal on Computing 45, 268 (2016).
- S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
- K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
- N. Gleinig and T. Hoefler, in 2021 58th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) (IEEE, 2021).
- G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Optimal hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 010501 (2017).
- T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 10.1103/revmodphys.90.015002 (2018).
- M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 365303 (2009).
- M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Adiabatic population transfer with control fields, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 107, 9937 (2003).
- M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Assisted adiabatic passage revisited, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 6838 (2005).
- F. Verstraete, M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Physics 5, 633 (2009).
- S. Polla, Y. Herasymenko, and T. E. O’Brien, Quantum digital cooling, Physical Review A 104, 012414 (2021).
- H.-Y. Su and Y. Li, Quantum algorithm for the simulation of open-system dynamics and thermalization, Physical Review A 101, 012328 (2020).
- R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiał, Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 291 (2007).
- S.-J. Ran, Encoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032310 (2020).
- G. Wang, S. Sim, and P. D. Johnson, State preparation boosters for early fault-tolerant quantum computation, Quantum 6, 829 (2022).
- G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization, Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
- A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations, Quantum Info. Comput. 12, 901–924 (2012).
- M. Suzuki, Fractal decomposition of exponential operators with applications to many-body theories and monte carlo simulations, Physics Letters A 146, 319 (1990).
- E. T. Campbell, Early fault-tolerant simulations of the hubbard model, Quantum Science and Technology 7, 015007 (2021).
- K. Hejazi, M. S. Zini, and J. M. Arrazola, Better bounds for low-energy product formulas, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2402.10362 [quant-ph] .
- A. M. Childs, A. Ostrander, and Y. Su, Faster quantum simulation by randomization, Quantum 3, 10.22331/q-2019-09-02-182 (2019).
- C. H. Cho, D. W. Berry, and M.-H. Hsieh, Doubling the order of approximation via the randomized product formula, arXiv e-prints (2022), arXiv:2210.11281 [quant-ph] .
- G. C. Knee and W. J. Munro, Optimal trotterization in universal quantum simulators under faulty control, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052327 (2015).
- E. Campbell, Random compiler for fast hamiltonian simulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070503 (2019).
- O. Kiss, M. Grossi, and A. Roggero, Importance sampling for stochastic quantum simulations, Quantum 7, 977 (2023).
- K. Nakaji, M. Bagherimehrab, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, qswift: High-order randomized compiler for hamiltonian simulation (2023), arXiv:2302.14811 [quant-ph].
- A. Rajput, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe, Hybridized Methods for Quantum Simulation in the Interaction Picture, Quantum 6, 780 (2022).
- M. Hagan and N. Wiebe, Composite Quantum Simulations, Quantum 7, 1181 (2023).
- P. W. Anderson, Infrared catastrophe in fermi gases with local scattering potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1049 (1967).
- T. Louvet, T. Ayral, and X. Waintal, Go-no go criteria for performing quantum chemistry calculations on quantum computers, arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv:2306.02620 [quant-ph] .
- S. Arlot, A. Celisse, and Z. Harchaoui, A kernel multiple change-point algorithm via model selection, Journal of Machine Learning Research 20, 1 (2019).
- C. Truong, L. Oudre, and N. Vayatis, Selective review of offline change point detection methods, Signal Processing 167, 107299 (2020).
- C. S. Jürgen Bortz, Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 7th ed. (Springer, 2010).
- T. S. Cubitt, A. Montanaro, and S. Piddock, Universal quantum hamiltonians, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 9497 (2018).
- J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical simulations with tensor networks: Tensor network python (tenpy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018), code available from https://github.com/tenpy/tenpy, arXiv:1805.00055 .
- Q. A. Team and Collaborators, qsim (2021).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.