Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Two-dimensional Kripke Semantics I: Presheaves

Published 7 May 2024 in cs.LO, math.CT, and math.LO | (2405.04157v2)

Abstract: The study of modal logic has witnessed tremendous development following the introduction of Kripke semantics. However, recent developments in programming languages and type theory have led to a second way of studying modalities, namely through their categorical semantics. We show how the two correspond.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (104)
  1. Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories. Cambridge University Press, 1994. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511600579.
  2. Categorical and Kripke semantics for constructive S4 modal logic. Computer Science Logic, pages 292–307, 2001. doi:10.1007/3-540-44802-0_21.
  3. Topo-logie. In Mathieu Anel and Gabriel Catren, editors, New Spaces in Mathematics, pages 155–257. Cambridge University Press, 2021. doi:10.1017/9781108854429.007.
  4. Steve Awodey. Category Theory. Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, 2010.
  5. Topos Semantics for Higher-Order Modal Logic. Logique et Analyse, 228:591–636, 2014. doi:10.2143/LEA.228.0.3078176.
  6. Kripke Semantics for Martin-Löf’s Extensional Type Theory. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 7(3):1–34, 2011. doi:10.2168/LMCS-7(3:18)2011.
  7. Categorification. In Ezra Getzler and Mikhail Kapranov, editors, Higher Category Theory, number 230 in Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 1998. eprint: math/9802029. doi:10.48550/arXiv.math/9802029.
  8. B. Banaschewski and G. Bruns. The fundamental duality of partially ordered sets. Order, 5(1), 1988. doi:10.1007/BF00143898.
  9. J. Bénabou. Distributors at work, 2000. Notes of Thomas Streicher based on lectures of Jean Bénabou. URL: https://www2.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~streicher/FIBR/DiWo.pdf.
  10. Evert Willem Beth. The Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland Pub. Co., 1959.
  11. A semantic hierarchy for intuitionistic logic. Indagationes Mathematicae, 30(3):403–469, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.indag.2019.01.001.
  12. Nick Bezhanishvili. Lattices of intermediate and cylindric modal logics. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2006. Report number DS-2006-02. URL: https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/2049/.
  13. Modal dependent type theory and dependent right adjoints. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 30(2):118–138, 2020. doi:10.1017/S0960129519000197.
  14. First steps in synthetic guarded domain theory: step-indexing in the topos of trees. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 8(4), 2012. doi:10.2168/LMCS-8(4:1)2012.
  15. Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050884.
  16. Francis Borceux. Handbook of Categorical Algebra, volume 3 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  17. Francis Borceux. Handbook of Categorical Algebra, volume 1 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  18. Cauchy completion in category theory. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques, 27(2):133–146, 1986. URL: http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=CTGDC_1986__27_2_133_0.
  19. Models for normal intuitionistic modal logics. Studia Logica, 43(3):217–245, 1984. doi:10.1007/BF02429840.
  20. Marta Bunge. Categories of Set-Valued Functors. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1966.
  21. Presheaf models for concurrency. In Dirk Dalen and Marc Bezem, editors, Computer Science Logic, volume 1258 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 58–75, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/3-540-63172-0_32.
  22. Profunctors, open maps and bisimulation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 15(3):553–614, 2005. doi:10.1017/S0960129505004718.
  23. Modal Logic. Number 35 in Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, 1996. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198537793.001.0001.
  24. Denis-Charles Cisinski. Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra. Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi:10.1017/9781108588737.
  25. Ranald Clouston. Fitch-Style Modal Lambda Calculi. In Christel Baier and Ugo Dal Lago, editors, Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures, volume 10803 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 258–275, Cham, 2018. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89366-2_14.
  26. Roy L. Crole. Categories for Types. Cambridge University Press, 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139172707.
  27. On intuitionistic diamonds (and lack thereof). In Revantha Ramanayake and Josef Urban, editors, Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, volume 14278 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 283–301. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43513-3_16.
  28. Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2002. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809088.
  29. On the connection of partially ordered sets with some pseudo-boolean algebras. Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), 69:317–329, 1966. doi:10.1016/S1385-7258(66)50036-1.
  30. Intuitionistic propositional logic with Galois connections. Logic Journal of IGPL, 18(6):837–858, 2010. doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzp057.
  31. M. Erné. The ABC of order and topology. In H. Herrlich and H. E. Porst, editors, Category Theory at Work, Research and Exposition in Mathematics, pages 57–83. Heldermann Verlag, 1991. URL: https://www.heldermann.de/R&E/RAE18/ctw05.pdf.
  32. Leo Esakia. Heyting Algebras: Duality Theory, volume 50 of Trends in Logic. Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12096-2.
  33. W. B. Ewald. Intuitionistic Tense and Modal Logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51(1):166–179, 1986. doi:10.2307/2273953.
  34. Abstract syntax and variable binding. In Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158), pages 193–202, Trento, Italy, 1999. IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/LICS.1999.782615.
  35. Marcelo Fiore. Second-Order and Dependently-Sorted Abstract Syntax. In 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 57–68. IEEE, 2008. doi:10.1109/LICS.2008.38.
  36. Second-Order Equational Logic (Extended Abstract). In Anuj Dawar and Helmut Veith, editors, Computer Science Logic, volume 6247 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 320–335. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15205-4_26.
  37. Second-Order Algebraic Theories: (Extended Abstract). In Petr Hliněnỳ and Antonín Kučera, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2010, volume 6281 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 368–380. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15155-2_33.
  38. Gisèle Fischer Servi. Semantics for a class of intuitionistic modal calculi. In Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, volume 47 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pages 59–72. Springer Netherlands, 1980. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8937-5_5.
  39. Melvin Fitting. Intuitionistic Logic, Model Theory and Forcing. Studies in Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics. North-Holland, 1969.
  40. Mai Gehrke. Stone duality, topological algebra, and recognition. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 220(7):2711–2747, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2015.12.007.
  41. Mai Gehrke and Sam van Gool. Topological Duality for Distributive Lattices: Theory and Applications. Number 61 in Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, 2024. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03286.
  42. S. Ghilardi and G. C. Meloni. Modal and tense predicate logic: Models in presheaves and categorical conceptualization. In Francis Borceux, editor, Categorical Algebra and its Applications, volume 1348 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 130–142. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988. doi:10.1007/BFb0081355.
  43. Silvio Ghilardi. Presheaf semantics and independence results for some non-classical first-order logics. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 29(2):125–136, 1989. doi:10.1007/BF01620621.
  44. Silvio Ghilardi. Incompleteness Results in Kripke Semantics. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56(2):517–538, 1991. doi:10.2307/2274697.
  45. Robert Goldblatt. Metamathematics of Modal Logic. PhD Thesis, Victoria University, Wellington, 1974.
  46. Robert Goldblatt. Mathematical modal logic: A view of its evolution. In Dov M. Gabbay, editor, Handbook of the History of Logic, volume 7. Elsevier, 2006. doi:10.1016/S1570-8683(03)00008-9.
  47. Temporal Logic. In Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, editors, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2023 edition, 2023.
  48. Daniel Gratzer. Normalization for Multimodal Type Theory. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. doi:10.1145/3531130.3532398.
  49. Daniel Gratzer. Syntax and semantics of modal type theory. PhD thesis, Aarhus University, 2023.
  50. Modalities and Parametric Adjoints. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 23(3):1–29, 2022. doi:10.1145/3514241.
  51. Multimodal Dependent Type Theory. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 492–506. Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. doi:10.1145/3373718.3394736.
  52. Multimodal Dependent Type Theory. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 17(3), 2021. doi:10.46298/lmcs-17(3:11)2021.
  53. Makoto Hamana. Free ΣΣ\Sigmaroman_Σ-Monoids: A Higher-Order Syntax with Metavariables. In Wei-Ngan Chin, editor, Programming Languages and Systems, volume 3302 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 348–363. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30477-7_23.
  54. Yasusi Hasimoto. Heyting Algebras with Operators. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 47(2):187–196, 2001. doi:10.1002/1521-3870(200105)47:2<187::AID-MALQ187>3.0.CO;2-J.
  55. Jens Hemelaer. Toposes over which essential implies locally connected. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques, LXIII(4):425–451, 2022. arXiv:2204.02749.
  56. Claudio Hermida. A categorical outlook on relational modalities and simulations. Information and Computation, 209(12):1505–1517, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2010.09.009.
  57. Martin Hofmann. Syntax and Semantics of Dependent Types. In Andrew M. Pitts and P. Dybjer, editors, Semantics and Logics of Computation, pages 79–130. Cambridge University Press, 1997. URL: https://www.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/mitarbeiter/martin-hofmann/pdfs/syntaxandsemanticsof-dependenttypes.pdf, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526619.004.
  58. Martin Hofmann. Semantical analysis of higher-order abstract syntax. In Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Cat. No. PR00158), pages 204–213. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999. doi:10.1109/LICS.1999.782616.
  59. Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2004.
  60. Peter T. Johnstone. Open maps of toposes. Manuscripta Mathematica, 31(1):217–247, 1980. doi:10.1007/BF01303275.
  61. Peter T. Johnstone. Stone Spaces. Number 3 in Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  62. Peter T. Johnstone. Sketches of an Elephant: A Topos Theory Compendium, volume 1. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  63. Peter T. Johnstone. Sketches of an Elephant: A Topos Theory Compendium, volume 2. Oxford University Press, 2002.
  64. Boolean algebras with operators. part II. American Journal of Mathematics, 74(1):127, 1952. doi:10.2307/2372074.
  65. Bisimulation from Open Maps. Information and Computation, 127(2):164–185, 1996. doi:10.1006/inco.1996.0057.
  66. G. Max Kelly. Basic concepts of enriched category theory. Reprints in Theory and Applications of Categories, (10):1–136, 2005. Originally published as: Cambridge University Press, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 64, 1982. URL: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/10/tr10abs.html.
  67. Kohei Kishida. Categories and modalities. In Elaine Landry, editor, Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford University Press, 2018. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198748991.003.0009.
  68. Saul Kripke. Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16:83–94, 1963. doi:10.1002/malq.19630090502.
  69. Saul A. Kripke. Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Modal Propositional Calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9(5-6):67–96, 1963. doi:10.1002/malq.19630090502.
  70. Saul A. Kripke. Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic II. Non-Normal Modal Propositional Calculi. In Alfred Tarski, Leon Henkin, and J. W. Addison, editors, The theory of models, Proceedings of the 1963 International Symposium at Berkeley, pages 206–220. North-Holland, 1965.
  71. Joachim Lambek. From lambda calculus to cartesian closed categories. In Jonathan P. Seldin and J. Roger Hindley, editors, To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus, and Formalism, pages 376–402. Academic Press, 1980.
  72. Introduction to Higher-Order Categorical Logic. Number 7 in Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  73. F. William Lawvere. Metric spaces, generalized logic, and closed categories. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano, 43(1):135–166, 1973. doi:10.1007/BF02924844.
  74. Fosco Loregian. (Co)end Calculus. Cambridge University Press, 2021. doi:10.1017/9781108778657.
  75. Saunders Mac Lane. Categories for the Working Mathematician, volume 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2 edition, 1978. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8.
  76. Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory. Universitext. Springer New York, 1994. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0927-0.
  77. Colin McLarty. Every Grothendieck topos has a one-way site. Theory and Applications of Categories, 16(5):123–126, 2006. URL: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/16/5/16-05abs.html.
  78. M. Menni and C. Smith. Modes of adjointness. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(2):365–391, 2014. doi:10.1007/s10992-012-9266-y.
  79. Kripke-style models for typed lambda calculus. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 51(1-2):99–124, 1991. doi:10.1016/0168-0072(91)90067-V.
  80. Petri nets, event structures and domains, Part I. Theoretical Computer Science, 13(1):85–108, 1981. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(81)90112-2.
  81. F. J. Oles. Type Algebras, Functor Categories, and Block Structure. In Maurice Nivat and John C. Reynolds, editors, Algebraic Methods in Semantics, pages 543–573. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  82. Frank J. Oles. Functor Categories and Store Shapes. In Peter W. O’Hearn and Robert D. Tennent, editors, Algol-like Languages, volume 2, pages 3–12. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1997. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3851-3_1.
  83. Discrete Dualities for Heyting algebras with Operators. Fundamenta Informaticae, 81(1):275–295, 2007.
  84. Frames and Locales: Topology without points. Frontiers in Mathematics. Springer Basel, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0154-6.
  85. A framework for intuitionistic modal logics. In Joseph Y. Halpern, editor, Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Monterey, CA, USA, March 1986. Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.
  86. George N. Raney. Completely distributive complete lattices. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 3(5):677–680, 1952. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1952-0052392-3.
  87. Emily Riehl. Categorical homotopy theory, volume 24 of New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107261457.
  88. Emily Riehl. Category Theory in Context. Dover Publications, 2016. URL: http://www.math.jhu.edu/~eriehl/context.pdf.
  89. Positive logic with adjoint modalities: proof theory, semantics, and reasoning about information. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 3(3):351–373, 2010. doi:10.1017/S1755020310000134.
  90. Davide Sangiorgi. On the origins of bisimulation and coinduction. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 31(4):1–41, 2009. doi:10.1145/1516507.1516510.
  91. Krister Segerberg. Decidability of S4.1. Theoria, 34(1):7–20, 1968. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1968.tb00335.x.
  92. Alex K. Simpson. The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal Logic. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh, 1994. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/407.
  93. Lectures on the Curry-Howard Isomorphism. Elsevier, 2006.
  94. V. H. Sotirov. Modal theories with intuitionistic logic. In Mathematical Logic: Proceedings of the Conference on Mathematical Logic, Dedicated to the Memory of A.A. Markov (1903-1979): Sofia, September 22-23, 1980. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1984.
  95. David Spivak. Conditions for a functor to induce a logical functor between presheaf toposes? MathOverflow, 2016. URL: https://mathoverflow.net/q/253878, arXiv:https://mathoverflow.net/q/253878.
  96. S. K. Thomason. Categories of frames for modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 40(3):439–442, 1975. doi:10.2307/2272167.
  97. Normalization for Fitch-style Modal Calculi. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 6(ICFP):772–798, 2022. doi:10.1145/3547649.
  98. Johan van Benthem. Modal logic for open minds. Number 199 in CSLI lecture notes. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, California, 2010.
  99. Philip Wadler. Propositions as types. Communications of the ACM, 58(12):75–84, 2015. URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/propositions-as-types/propositions-as-types.pdf, doi:10.1145/2699407.
  100. Glynn Winskel. Prime algebraicity. Theoretical Computer Science, 410(41):4160–4168, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.06.015.
  101. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. The relation between intuitionistic and classical modal logics. Algebra and Logic, 36(2):73–92, 1997. doi:10.1007/BF02672476.
  102. Intuitionistic Modal Logic. In Andrea Cantini, Ettore Casari, and Pierluigi Minari, editors, Logic and Foundations of Mathematics: Selected Contributed Papers of the Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 1995, pages 227–238. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1999. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2109-7_17.
  103. Intuitionistic Modal Logics as Fragments of Classical Bimodal Logics. In Ewa Orłowska, editor, Logic at Work: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 168–186. Physica Heidelberg, 1999.
  104. David Yetter. On right adjoints to exponential functors. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 45(3):287–304, 1987. doi:10.1016/0022-4049(87)90077-6.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper establishes a duality between Kripke semantics and categorical models using presheaf categories to unify modalities in logic.
  • The paper introduces proof-relevant semantics and intuitionistic modal frameworks that pave the way for richer logical constructs.
  • The paper demonstrates the role of category theory, particularly via morphisms and complete lattices, in interpreting modal logic.

Two-dimensional Kripke Semantics I: Presheaves

The paper, authored by G. A. Kavvos, provides a profound exposition on the interplay between Kripke semantics and categorical semantics within the framework of modal logic. Modal logic traditionally employs Kripke semantics, where worlds and their relations are represented in a partially ordered set framework. However, recent advances in programming languages and type theory suggest an alternative approach via categorical semantics, leveraging tools from category theory and type theory. This paper explicates how these two semantics are not only related, but can be viewed as duals through the lens of category theory, particularly presheaf categories.

Key Contributions and Findings

  1. Integration of Kripke and Categorical Semantics: The paper establishes a structural connection between Kripke and categorical semantics for modal logic by treating them as dual aspects of a single conceptual framework. Specifically, it shows that a profunctor, seen as a proof-relevant relation on a category, uniquely corresponds to a categorical model of modal logic in the presheaf category.
  2. Intuitionistic Modal Logic: A significant portion of the paper addresses intuitionistic modal logic, emphasizing the need to establish a duality within an intuitionistic substrate. The paper suggests canonical choices for intuitionistic modalities and investigates their inductive structural semantics.
  3. Proof-relevant Kripke Semantics: For proofs in modal logic to naturally extend into the field of categorical semantics, an additional dimension, termed proof-relevance, is integrated into Kripke semantics by adopting presheaf categories. This extends conventional logic interpretations, thus allowing intuitive handling of Kripke annealed frames and ties into intuitionistic logic.
  4. Category Theory and Complete Lattices: The research discusses prime algebraic lattices in connection with Heyting algebras for intuitionistic logic and extends this to modular Kripke frames. The lattice structure is examined, with lattice morphisms providing insights into the interpretations of relation-preserving functors, thus connecting them to homomorphic images in categorical structures.
  5. Morphisms and Functorial Dualities: Attention is given to morphisms between frames as a basis to construct mappings within the dual categorical models, emphasizing the role of open maps and order preservation in ensuring the correctness and completeness of logical inferences.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research extend both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, the establishment of dualities between Kripke frames and categorical models furnishes a robust foundation for reasoning about modalities in a variety of logical montages, supporting richer semantic structures in constructive logics. Practically, such frameworks can impact the design of programming languages, improving the understanding of type systems and program equivalence through proof-relevant semantics.

The paper suggests several future research avenues, including refining the logical frameworks to explore non-classical logics and extending categorical semantics to encompass more complex modal structures. The integration of two-dimensional semantics into the computational paradigm also holds potential advantages in the development of more expressive type theories and programming language semantics.

In conclusion, the paper by G. A. Kavvos serves as a significant step towards unifying modal logic semantics, offering new ways to think about modalities through the prism of category theory and presheaves. It reveals deep structural insights that could anchor future investigations in modal theories and their applications in computer science and logic.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. G. A. Kavvos 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 6 tweets with 165 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free