Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Turning the Ratchet: Dynamic Screening with Multiple Agents

Published 7 May 2024 in econ.TH | (2405.04468v3)

Abstract: We study a dynamic contracting problem with multiple agents and limited commitment. A principal seeks to screen efficient agents using one-period contracts, but is tempted to revise contract terms upon knowing an agent's type. Alterations of contracts are observable and, hence, whenever past promises are broken future information revelation stops. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions under which information revelation can be fostered. For sufficiently patient players, private information is either never revealed or fully revealed in a sequential manner. Optimal contracts provide high-powered incentives upon initial disclosure of an agent's type, and rewards for information revelation vanish over time.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Acemoglu, Daron, Mikhail Golosov, and Aleh Tsyvinski, “Dynamic Mirrlees Taxation under Political Economy Constraints,” Review of Economic Studies, 2010, 77 (3), 841–881.
  2. Acharya, Avidit and Juan Ortner, “Progressive Learning,” Econometrica, 2017, 85 (6), 1965–1990.
  3. Albanesi, Stefania and Christopher Sleet, “Dynamic Optimal Taxation with Private Information,” Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73 (1), 1–30.
  4. Ausubel, Lawrence M. and Raymond J. Deneckere, “Reputation in Bargaining and Durable Goods Monopoly,” Econometrica, 1989, 57 (3), 511–531.
  5. Bester, Helmut and Roland Strausz, “Contracting with Imperfect Commitment and the Revelation Principle: The Single Agent Case,” Econometrica, 2001, 69 (4), 1077–1098.
  6. Bonatti, Alessandro, “Menu Pricing and Learning,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2011, 3 (3), 124–63.
  7. Carmichael, H. Lorne and W. Bentley MacLeod, “Worker Cooperation and the Ratchet Effect,” Journal of Labor Economics, 2000, 18 (1), 1–19.
  8. Deb, Rahul and Maher Said, “Dynamic Screening with Limited Commitment,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2015, 159, 891–928.
  9. Doval, Laura and Vasiliki Skreta, “Mechanism Design with Limited Commitment,” Econometrica, 2022, 90 (4), 1463–1500.
  10. Freixas, Xavier, Roger Guesnerie, and Jean Tirole, “Planning under Incomplete Information and the Ratchet Effect,” Review of Economic Studies, 1985, 52 (2), 173–191.
  11. Gerardi, Dino and Lucas Maestri, “Dynamic Contracting with Limited Commitment and the Ratchet Effect,” Theoretical Economics, 2020, 15 (2), 583–623.
  12. Golosov, Mikhail and Luigi Iovino, “Social Insurance, Information Revelation, and Lack of Commitment,” Journal of Political Economy, 2021, 129 (9), 2629–2665.
  13. Hart, Oliver D. and Jean Tirole, “Contract Renegotiation and Coasian Dynamics,” Review of Economic Studies, 1988, 55 (4), 509–540.
  14. Kanemoto, Yoshitsugu and W. Bentley MacLeod, “The Ratchet Effect and the Market for Secondhand Workers,” Journal of Labor Economics, 1992, 10 (1), 85–98.
  15. Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Jean Tirole, “The Dynamics of Incentive Contracts,” Econometrica, 1988, 56 (5), 1153–1175.
  16. Levin, Jonathan, “Multilateral Contracting and the Employment Relationship,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117 (3), 1075–1103.
  17. Liu, Qingmin, Konrad Mierendorff, Xianwen Shi, and Weijie Zhong, “Auctions with Limited Commitment,” American Economic Review, March 2019, 109 (3), 876–910.
  18. Maestri, Lucas, “Dynamic Contracting under Adverse Selection and Renegotiation,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2017, 171, 136–173.
  19. Scheuer, Florian and Alexander Wolitzky, “Capital Taxation under Political Constraints,” American Economic Review, August 2016, 106 (8), 2304–28.
  20. Skreta, Vasiliki, “Sequentially Optimal Mechanisms,” Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73 (4), 1085–1111.
  21.   , “Optimal Auction Design Under Non-Commitment,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2015, 159, 854–890.
  22. Sleet, Christopher and Sevin Yeltekin, “Politically Credible Social Insurance,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 2008, 55 (1), 129–151.
  23. Strulovici, Bruno, “Contract Negotiation and the Coase Conjecture: A Strategic Foundation for Renegotiation-Proof Contracts,” Econometrica, 2017, 85 (2), 585–616.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.