Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Efficient designs for threshold group testing without gap

Published 9 May 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2405.05827v1)

Abstract: Given $d$ defective items in a population of $n$ items with $d \ll n$, in threshold group testing without gap, the outcome of a test on a subset of items is positive if the subset has at least $u$ defective items and negative otherwise, where $1 \leq u \leq d$. The basic goal of threshold group testing is to quickly identify the defective items via a small number of tests. In non-adaptive design, all tests are designed independently and can be performed in parallel. The decoding time in the non-adaptive state-of-the-art work is a polynomial of $(d/u)u (d/(d-u)){d - u}, d$, and $\log{n}$. In this work, we present a novel design that significantly reduces the number of tests and the decoding time to polynomials of $\min{uu, (d - u){d - u}}, d$, and $\log{n}$. In particular, when $u$ is a constant, the number of tests and the decoding time are $O(d3 (\log2{n}) \log{(n/d)} )$ and $O\big(d3 (\log2{n}) \log{(n/d)} + d2 (\log{n}) \log3{(n/d)} \big)$, respectively. For a special case when $u = 2$, with non-adaptive design, the number of tests and the decoding time are $O(d3 (\log{n}) \log{(n/d)} )$ and $O(d2 (\log{n} + \log2{(n/d)}) )$, respectively. Moreover, with 2-stage design, the number of tests and the decoding time are $O(d2 \log2{(n/d)} )$.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.