Searches for the BSM scenarios at the LHC using decision tree based machine learning algorithms: A comparative study and review of Random Forest, Adaboost, XGboost and LightGBM frameworks
Abstract: Machine learning algorithms are now being extensively used in our daily lives, spanning across diverse industries as well as academia. In the field of high energy physics (HEP), the most common and challenging task is separating a rare signal from a much larger background. The boosted decision tree (BDT) algorithm has been a cornerstone of the high energy physics for analyzing event triggering, particle identification, jet tagging, object reconstruction, event classification, and other related tasks for quite some time. This article presents a comprehensive overview of research conducted by both HEP experimental and phenomenological groups that utilize decision tree algorithms in the context of the Standard Model and Supersymmetry (SUSY). We also summarize the basic concept of machine learning and decision tree algorithm along with the working principle of \texttt{Random Forest}, \texttt{AdaBoost} and two gradient boosting frameworks, such as \texttt{XGBoost}, and \texttt{LightGBM}. Using a case study of electroweakino productions at the high luminosity LHC, we demonstrate how these algorithms lead to improvement in the search sensitivity compared to traditional cut-based methods in both compressed and non-compressed R-parity conserving SUSY scenarios. The effect of different hyperparameters and their optimization, feature importance study using SHapley values are also discussed in detail.
- World Scientific, 2004.
- H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak Scale Supersymmetry: From Superfields to Scattering Events. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
- “Atlas susy public result.” https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults.
- “Cms susy public result.” https://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/preliminary-results/SUS/index.html.
- M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, The new “MUON G-2” result and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1114, [2104.03287].
- Springer New York, New York, NY, 1988. 10.1007/978-1-4613-8716-9_14.
- Preface to special issue on “learning to discover”, International Journal of Modern Physics A 35 (2020) 2002003, [https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X20020030].
- 01, 2006. 10.1117/1.2819119.
- Springer, 2009.
- Springer US, Boston, MA, 2005. 10.1007/0-387-25465-X_40.
- HEP ML Community, “A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics.”
- Heavy flavor identification at cms with deep neural networks, 2020.
- “Cms phase 1 heavy flavour identification performance anddevelopments, cms detector performance note, cms-dp-2017-013, 2017.”
- Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953. doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018.
- Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1984.
- 10, 2017, 10.1201/9781315139470.
- “C. gini, variabilità e mutabilità, (reprinted in memorie di metodologica statistica, eds. e. pizetti and t. salvemini, libreria eredi virgilio veschi, rome, 1955), 1912.”
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.