On the single versus the repetitive Penrose process in a Kerr black hole
Abstract: Extracting the rotational energy from a Kerr black hole (BH) is one of the crucial topics in relativistic astrophysics. Here, we give special attention to the Penrose ballistic process based on the fission of a massive particle $\mu_0$ into two particles $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, occurring in the ergosphere of a Kerr BH. Bardeen et al. indicated that for the process to occur, some additional "hydrodynamical forces or superstrong radiation reactions" were needed. Wald and Chandrasekhar further expanded this idea. This animosity convinced T. Piran and collaborators to move from a simple three-body system characterizing the original Penrose process to a many-body system. This many-body approach was further largely expanded by others, some questionable in their validity. Here, we return to the simplest original Penrose process and show that the solution of the equations of motion, imposing the turning point condition on their trajectories, leads to the rotational energy extraction from the BH expected by Penrose. The efficiency of energy extraction by a single process is quantified for three different single decay processes occurring respectively at $r=1.2 M$, $r=1.5 M$, and $r=1.9 M$. An interesting repetitive model has been proposed by Misner, Thorne & Wheeler (hereafter MTW73). Indeed, it would appear that a repetitive sequence of $246$ decays of the above injection process at $r=1.2 M$ and the corresponding ones at $r=1.5 M$ and $r=1.9 M$ could extract $100\%$ of the rotational energy of the BH, so violating energy conservation. The accompanying paper, accounting for the existence of the BH irreducible mass, introduces a non-linear approach that avoids violating energy conservation and leads to a new energy extraction process.
- C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973) [MTW73].
- R. P. Kerr, Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
- B. Carter, Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields, Physical Review 174, 1559 (1968).
- R. Ruffini and J. A. Wheeler, Relativistic cosmology and space platforms., ESRO SP 52, 45 (1971a).
- R. Ruffini and J. A. Wheeler, Introducing the black hole, Physics Today 24, 30 (1971b).
- R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse: the Role of General Relativity, Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie 1, 252 (1969).
- D. Christodoulou, Reversible and Irreversible Transformations in Black-Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1596 (1970).
- R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of Rotational Energy from a Black Hole, Nature Physical Science 229, 177 (1971).
- S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes (1983).
- E. Leiderschneider and T. Piran, Maximal efficiency of the collisional penrose process, Physical Review D 93, 043015 (2016).
- A. Kovetz and T. Piran, The efficiency of the penrose process, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985) 12, 39 (1975).
- E. Berti, R. Brito, and V. Cardoso, Ultrahigh-energy debris from the collisional penrose process, Physical Review Letters 114, 251103 (2015).
- D. Christodoulou and R. Ruffini, Reversible Transformations of a Charged Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D 4, 3552 (1971).
- S. W. Hawking, Gravitational Radiation from Colliding Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1344 (1971).
- D. H. Menzel, The Source of Solar Energy, Science 65, 431 (1927).
- T. Piran and J. Shaham, Can soft γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-ray bursts be emitted by accreting black holes?, Nature 256, 112 (1975).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.