Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Efficient and Scalable Architectures for Multi-Level Superconducting Qubit Readout

Published 14 May 2024 in quant-ph and cs.AR | (2405.08982v2)

Abstract: Realizing the full potential of quantum computing requires large-scale quantum computers capable of running quantum error correction (QEC) to mitigate hardware errors and maintain quantum data coherence. While quantum computers operate within a two-level computational subspace, many processor modalities are inherently multi-level systems. This leads to occasional leakage into energy levels outside the computational subspace, complicating error detection and undermining QEC protocols. The problem is particularly severe in engineered qubit devices like superconducting transmons, a leading technology for fault-tolerant quantum computing. Addressing this challenge requires effective multi-level quantum system readout to identify and mitigate leakage errors. We propose a scalable, high-fidelity three-level readout that reduces FPGA resource usage by $60\times$ compared to the baseline while reducing readout time by 20\%, enabling faster leakage detection. By employing matched filters to detect relaxation and excitation error patterns and integrating a modular lightweight neural network to correct crosstalk errors, the protocol significantly reduces hardware complexity, achieving a $100\times$ reduction in neural network size. Our design supports efficient, real-time implementation on off-the-shelf FPGAs, delivering a 6.6\% relative improvement in readout accuracy over the baseline. This innovation enables faster leakage mitigation, enhances QEC reliability, and accelerates the path toward fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. M. Brooks, “The race to find quantum computing’s sweet spot,” Nature, vol. 617, pp. S1–S3, 2023.
  2. F. Arute et al., “Quantum Supremacy using a Programmable Superconducting Processor,” Nature, vol. 574, pp. 505–510, Oct. 2019.
  3. R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, R. Allen, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, S. Boixo, and et. al, “Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit,” Nature, vol. 614, pp. 676–681, Feb 2023.
  4. M. Suchara, A. W. Cross, and J. M. Gambetta, “Leakage suppression in the toric code,” in 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pp. 1119–1123, 2015.
  5. M. McEwen, D. Kafri, Z. Chen, J. Atalaya, K. J. Satzinger, C. Quintana, P. V. Klimov, D. Sank, C. Gidney, A. G. Fowler, F. Arute, K. Arya, B. Buckley, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, C. Erickson, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, T. Huang, S. Hong, E. Jeffrey, S. Kim, K. Kechedzhi, F. Kostritsa, P. Laptev, A. Megrant, X. Mi, J. Mutus, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, M. Niu, A. Paler, N. Redd, P. Roushan, T. C. White, J. Yao, P. Yeh, A. Zalcman, Y. Chen, V. N. Smelyanskiy, J. M. Martinis, H. Neven, J. Kelly, A. N. Korotkov, A. G. Petukhov, and R. Barends, “Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, Mar. 2021.
  6. K. C. Miao, M. McEwen, J. Atalaya, D. Kafri, L. P. Pryadko, A. Bengtsson, A. Opremcak, K. J. Satzinger, Z. Chen, P. V. Klimov, C. Quintana, R. Acharya, K. Anderson, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. C. Bardin, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, L. Brill, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, J. Campero, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, P. Conner, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, D. M. Debroy, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, C. Erickson, R. Fatemi, V. S. Ferreira, L. F. Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, G. Garcia, W. Giang, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Gosula, A. G. Dau, J. A. Gross, M. C. Hamilton, S. D. Harrington, P. Heu, J. Hilton, M. R. Hoffmann, S. Hong, T. Huang, A. Huff, J. Iveland, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, J. Kelly, S. Kim, F. Kostritsa, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Landhuis, P. Laptev, L. Laws, K. Lee, B. J. Lester, A. T. Lill, W. Liu, A. Locharla, E. Lucero, S. Martin, A. Megrant, X. Mi, S. Montazeri, A. Morvan, O. Naaman, M. Neeley, C. Neill, A. Nersisyan, M. Newman, J. H. Ng, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, R. Potter, C. Rocque, P. Roushan, K. Sankaragomathi, H. F. Schurkus, C. Schuster, M. J. Shearn, A. Shorter, N. Shutty, V. Shvarts, J. Skruzny, W. C. Smith, G. Sterling, M. Szalay, D. Thor, A. Torres, T. White, B. W. K. Woo, Z. J. Yao, P. Yeh, J. Yoo, G. Young, A. Zalcman, N. Zhu, N. Zobrist, H. Neven, V. Smelyanskiy, A. Petukhov, A. N. Korotkov, D. Sank, and Y. Chen, “Overcoming leakage in quantum error correction,” Nature Physics, vol. 19, pp. 1780–1786, Dec 2023.
  7. J. Ghosh, A. G. Fowler, J. M. Martinis, and M. R. Geller, “Understanding the effects of leakage in superconducting quantum-error-detection circuits,” Physical Review A, vol. 88, Dec. 2013.
  8. B. G. Markaida and L.-A. Wu, “Implementation of leakage elimination operators and subspace protection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, p. 18846, Nov 2020.
  9. F. Battistel, B. Varbanov, and B. Terhal, “Hardware-efficient leakage-reduction scheme for quantum error correction with superconducting transmon qubits,” PRX Quantum, vol. 2, July 2021.
  10. C. J. Wood and J. M. Gambetta, “Quantification and characterization of leakage errors,” Physical Review A, vol. 97, Mar. 2018.
  11. A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 69, p. 062320, Jun 2004.
  12. R. Yanagimoto, R. Nehra, R. Hamerly, E. Ng, A. Marandi, and H. Mabuchi, “Quantum nondemolition measurements with optical parametric amplifiers for ultrafast universal quantum information processing,” PRX Quantum, vol. 4, Mar. 2023.
  13. P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 6, June 2019.
  14. B. Lienhard, A. Vepsäläinen, L. C. Govia, C. R. Hoffer, J. Y. Qiu, D. Ristè, M. Ware, D. Kim, R. Winik, A. Melville, B. Niedzielski, J. Yoder, G. J. Ribeill, T. A. Ohki, H. K. Krovi, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “Deep-neural-network discrimination of multiplexed superconducting-qubit states,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 17, p. 014024, Jan 2022.
  15. U. Azad and H. Zhang, “Machine learning based discrimination for excited state promoted readout,” 2022.
  16. S. Maurya, C. N. Mude, W. D. Oliver, B. Lienhard, and S. Tannu, “Scaling qubit readout with hardware efficient machine learning architectures,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’23, ACM, June 2023.
  17. C. A. Ryan, B. R. Johnson, J. M. Gambetta, J. M. Chow, M. P. da Silva, O. E. Dial, and T. A. Ohki, “Tomography via correlation of noisy measurement records,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 91, p. 022118, Feb 2015.
  18. B. M. Varbanov, F. Battistel, B. M. Tarasinski, V. P. Ostroukh, T. E. O’Brien, L. DiCarlo, and B. M. Terhal, “Leakage detection for a transmon-based surface code,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 6, Dec. 2020.
  19. P. Luchi, P. E. Trevisanutto, A. Roggero, J. L. DuBois, Y. J. Rosen, F. Turro, V. Amitrano, and F. Pederiva, “Enhancing qubit readout with autoencoders,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 20, p. 014045, Jul 2023.
  20. Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, “Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 8, Nov. 2020.
  21. P. Gokhale, J. M. Baker, C. Duckering, N. C. Brown, K. R. Brown, and F. T. Chong, “Asymptotic improvements to quantum circuits via qutrits,” in Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’19, ACM, June 2019.
  22. A. S. Nikolaeva, E. O. Kiktenko, and A. K. Fedorov, “Generalized toffoli gate decomposition using ququints: Towards realizing grover’s algorithm with qudits,” Entropy, vol. 25, p. 387, Feb. 2023.
  23. A. Córcoles, M. Takita, K. Inoue, S. Lekuch, Z. K. Minev, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Exploiting dynamic quantum circuits in a quantum algorithm with superconducting qubits,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 127, Aug. 2021.
  24. W. van Dam, M. Mykhailova, and M. Soeken, “Using azure quantum resource estimator for assessing performance of fault tolerant quantum computation,” 2023.
  25. R. Versluis, S. Poletto, N. Khammassi, B. Tarasinski, N. Haider, D. J. Michalak, A. Bruno, K. Bertels, and L. DiCarlo, “Scalable quantum circuit and control for a superconducting surface code,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 8, Sept. 2017.
  26. D. Volya and P. Mishra, “State preparation on quantum computers via quantum steering,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 1–14, 2024.
  27. N. Lacroix, L. Hofele, A. Remm, O. Benhayoune-Khadraoui, A. McDonald, R. Shillito, S. Lazar, C. Hellings, F. Swiadek, D. Colao-Zanuz, A. Flasby, M. B. Panah, M. Kerschbaum, G. J. Norris, A. Blais, A. Wallraff, and S. Krinner, “Fast flux-activated leakage reduction for superconducting quantum circuits,” 2023.
  28. N. Kanazawa, H. Emori, and D. C. McKay, “Qutrit state discrimination with mid-circuit measurements,” 2023.
  29. M. DeCross, E. Chertkov, M. Kohagen, and M. Foss-Feig, “Qubit-Reuse Compilation with Mid-Circuit Measurement and Reset,” Physical Review X, vol. 13, p. 041057, Oct. 2023.
  30. K. J. Mesman, F. Battistel, E. Reehuis, D. de Jong, M. J. Tiggelman, J. Gloudemans, J. C. van Oven, and C. C. Bultink, “Q-profile: Profiling tool for quantum control stacks applied to the quantum approximate optimization algorithm,” 2023.
  31. S. Brandhofer, I. Polian, and K. Krsulich, “Optimal qubit reuse for near-term quantum computers,” 2023.
  32. D. Amaro-Alcalá, B. C. Sanders, and H. de Guise, “Benchmarking of universal qutrit gates,” Physical Review A, vol. 109, Jan. 2024.
  33. A. Litteken, L. M. Seifert, J. D. Chadwick, N. Nottingham, T. Roy, Z. Li, D. Schuster, F. T. Chong, and J. M. Baker, “Dancing the quantum waltz: Compiling three-qubit gates on four level architectures,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’23, ACM, June 2023.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.