The Rise of Recommerce: Ownership and Sustainability with Overlapping Generations
Abstract: The emergence of the branded recommerce channel - digitally enabled and branded marketplaces that facilitate purchasing pre-owned items directly from a manufacturer's e-commerce site - leads to new variants of classic IS and economic questions relating to secondary markets. Such branded recommerce is increasingly platform-enabled, creating opportunities for greater sustainability and stronger brand experience control but posing a greater risk of cannibalization of the sales of new items. We model the effects that the sales of pre-owned items have on market segmentation and product durability choices for a monopolist facing heterogeneous customers, contrasting outcomes when the trade of pre-owned goods takes place through a third-party marketplace with outcomes under branded recommerce. We show that the direct revenue benefits of branded recommerce are not their primary source of value to the monopolist, and rather, there are three indirect effects that alter profits and sustainability. Product durability increases, a seller finds it optimal to forgo marketplace fees altogether, and there are greater seller incentives to lower the quality uncertainty associated with pre-owned items. We establish these results for a simple two-period model as well as developing a new infinite horizon model with overlapping generations. Our paper sheds new insight into this emerging digital channel phenomenon, underscoring the importance of recommerce platforms in aligning seller profits with sustainability goals.
- Bakos JY (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science 43(12):1676–1692.
- Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4):881–898.
- Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2008) When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Science 54(5):1029–1035.
- Bulow J (1982) Durable-goods monopolists. Journal of Political Economy 90(2):314–332.
- Bulow J (1986) An economic theory of planned obsolescence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(4):729.
- Coase RH (1972) Durability and monopoly. The Journal of Law and Economics 15(1):143–149.
- Cramer J, Krueger AB (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review 106(5):177–82.
- Fraiberger SP, Sundararajan A (2017) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. SSRN Electronic Journal ISSN 1556-5068.
- Ghose A (2009) Internet exchanges for used goods: An empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection. MIS Quarterly 33(2):263–291.
- Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999) Interfering with secondary markets. The RAND Journal of Economics 30(1):1.
- Ishihara M, Ching AT (2019) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: the case of Japanese video games. Marketing Science 38(3):392–416.
- Johnson JP (2011) Secondary markets with changing preferences. The RAND Journal of Economics 42(3):555–574.
- Levhari D, Srinivasan TN (1969) Durability of consumption goods: Competition versus monopoly. American Economic Review 59(1):102–107.
- Li Z, Wang G (2024) Regulating powerful platforms: Evidence from commission fee caps. Information Systems Research 0(0):1–15.
- Mantena R, Saha RL (2012) Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems 29(2):109–140.
- Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. The RAND Journal of Economics 15(2):171.
- Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory 18(2):301–317.
- Pang MS, Etzion H (2012) Analyzing pricing strategies for online services with network effects. Information Systems Research 23(4):1364–1377.
- Rao A (2015) Online content pricing: Purchase and rental markets. Marketing Science 34(3):430–451.
- Schmalensee R (1970) Regulation and the durability of goods. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1(1):54.
- Sieper E, Swan PL (1973) Monopoly and competition in the market for durable goods. The Review of Economic Studies 40(3):333.
- Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Science 50(12):1660–1673.
- Sundararajan A (2016) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (The MIT Press).
- Swan PL (1970) Durability of consumption goods. The American Economic Review 60(1):884–894.
- Swan PL (1971) The durability of goods and regulation of monopoly. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1):347.
- Villas-Boas JM (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. The RAND Journal of Economics 35(3):486.
- Waldman M (1996) Durable goods pricing when quality matters. The Journal of Business 69(4):489.
- Woody T (2024) Patagonia is cracking the code on endlessly recyclable wetsuits. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-05-02/patagonia-is-cracking-the-code-on-endlessly-recyclable-wetsuits.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
