Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Capacity of entanglement for scalar fields in squeezed states

Published 15 May 2024 in hep-th | (2405.09128v3)

Abstract: We study various aspects of capacity of entanglement in the squeezed states of a scalar field theory. This quantity is a quantum informational counterpart of heat capacity and characterizes the width of the eigenvalue spectrum of the reduced density matrix. In particular, we carefully examine the dependence of capacity of entanglement and its universal terms on the squeezing parameter in the specific regimes of the parameter space. Remarkably, we find that the capacity of entanglement obeys a volume law in the large squeezing limit. We discuss how these results are consistent with the behavior of other entanglement measures including entanglement and Renyi entropies. We also comment on the existence of consistent holographic duals for a family of Gaussian states with generic squeezing parameter based on the ratio of entanglement entropy and the capacity of entanglement.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio, “Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277-306 (2010) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 [arXiv:0808.3773 [quant-ph]].
  2. H. Casini and M. Huerta, “Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory,” J. Phys. A 42, 504007 (2009) doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504007 [arXiv:0905.2562 [hep-th]].
  3. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A 42, 504005 (2009) doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005 [arXiv:0905.4013 [cond-mat.stat-mech]].
  4. N. Laflorencie, “Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems,” Phys. Rept. 646, 1-59 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.008 [arXiv:1512.03388 [cond-mat.str-el]].
  5. T. Nishioka, “Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, no.3, 035007 (2018) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035007 [arXiv:1801.10352 [hep-th]].
  6. H. Casini and M. Huerta, “Lectures on entanglement in quantum field theory,” PoS TASI2021, 002 (2023) doi:10.22323/1.403.0002 [arXiv:2201.13310 [hep-th]].
  7. M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” Lect. Notes Phys. 931, pp.1-246 (2017) Springer, 2017, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0 [arXiv:1609.01287 [hep-th]].
  8. H. Casini and M. Huerta, “Remarks on the entanglement entropy for disconnected regions,” JHEP 03, 048 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/048 [arXiv:0812.1773 [hep-th]].
  9. G. Vidal, R. F. Werner, “A computable measure of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.032314 [quant-ph/0102117].
  10. H. Yao and X. L. Qi, “Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, no.8, 080501 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.080501 [arXiv:1001.1165 [cond-mat.str-el]].
  11. Y. Nakaguchi and T. Nishioka, “A holographic proof of Rényi entropic inequalities,” JHEP 12, 129 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)129 [arXiv:1606.08443 [hep-th]].
  12. Y. O. Nakagawa and S. Furukawa, “Capacity of entanglement and the distribution of density matrix eigenvalues in gapless systems,” Phys. Rev. B 96, no.20, 205108 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205108 [arXiv:1708.08924 [cond-mat.str-el]].
  13. J. De Boer, J. Järvelä and E. Keski-Vakkuri, “Aspects of capacity of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.6, 066012 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.066012 [arXiv:1807.07357 [hep-th]].
  14. K. Okuyama, “Capacity of entanglement in random pure state,” Phys. Lett. B 820, 136600 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136600 [arXiv:2103.08909 [hep-th]].
  15. P. Nandy, “Capacity of entanglement in local operators,” JHEP 07, 019 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)019 [arXiv:2106.00228 [hep-th]].
  16. B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy and T. Pathak, “Eigenstate capacity and Page curve in fermionic Gaussian states,” Phys. Rev. B 104, no.21, 214306 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.214306 [arXiv:2109.00557 [quant-ph]].
  17. L. Wei, “Average capacity of quantum entanglement,” J. Phys. A 56, no.1, 015302 (2023) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb114 [arXiv:2205.06343 [math-ph]].
  18. D. Shrimali, S. Bhowmick, V. Pandey and A. K. Pati, “Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. A 106, no.4, 042419 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042419 [arXiv:2207.11459 [quant-ph]].
  19. R. Arias, G. Di Giulio, E. Keski-Vakkuri and E. Tonni, “Probing RG flows, symmetry resolution and quench dynamics through the capacity of entanglement,” JHEP 03, 175 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)175 [arXiv:2301.02117 [cond-mat.stat-mech]].
  20. K. Andrzejewski, “Evolution of capacity of entanglement and modular entropy in harmonic chains and scalar fields,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 125013 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.125013 [arXiv:2309.03013 [hep-th]].
  21. J. Ren and D. Q. Sun, “Holographic supersymmetric Renyi entropies from hyperbolic black holes with scalar hair,” [arXiv:2404.05638 [hep-th]].
  22. T. Banks and P. Draper, “Generalized Entanglement Capacity of de Sitter Space,” [arXiv:2404.13684 [hep-th]].
  23. D. Katsinis, G. Pastras and N. Tetradis, “Entanglement of harmonic systems in squeezed states,” JHEP 10, 039 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)039 [arXiv:2304.04241 [hep-th]].
  24. L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee and R. D. Sorkin, “A Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 34, 373-383 (1986) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.373
  25. M. Srednicki, “Entropy and area,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666-669 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.666 [arXiv:hep-th/9303048 [hep-th]].
  26. D. N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291-1294 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291 [arXiv:gr-qc/9305007 [gr-qc]].
  27. D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743-3746 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743 [arXiv:hep-th/9306083 [hep-th]].
  28. K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama and K. Watanabe, “Probing Hawking radiation through capacity of entanglement,” JHEP 05, 062 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)062 [arXiv:2102.02425 [hep-th]].
  29. K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama and K. Watanabe, “Replica wormholes and capacity of entanglement,” JHEP 10, 227 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)227 [arXiv:2105.08396 [hep-th]].
  30. G. Adesso, S. Ragy and A. R. Lee, “Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond”, Open Systems and Information Dynamics 21 01n02 1440001 (2014) [arXiv:1401.4679 [quant-ph]]
  31. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl and N. Yokomizo, “Entanglement entropy of squeezed vacua on a lattice,” Phys. Rev. D 92, no.8, 085045 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.085045 [arXiv:1507.01567 [hep-th]].
  32. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl and M. Kieburg, “Page curve for fermionic Gaussian states,” Phys. Rev. B 103, no.24, L241118 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L241118 [arXiv:2103.05416 [quant-ph]].
  33. X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, “Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity,” JHEP 10, 240 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)240 [arXiv:1811.05382 [hep-th]].
  34. C. Akers and P. Rath, “Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction,” JHEP 05, 052 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)052 [arXiv:1811.05171 [hep-th]].
  35. T. Hartman, “Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge,” [arXiv:1303.6955 [hep-th]].
  36. T. Hartman, C. A. Keller and B. Stoica, “Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,” JHEP 09, 118 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)118 [arXiv:1405.5137 [hep-th]].
  37. P. Caputa, M. Nozaki and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement of local operators in large-N conformal field theories,” PTEP 2014, 093B06 (2014) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptu122 [arXiv:1405.5946 [hep-th]].
  38. C. T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and T. Hartman, “Entanglement Scrambling in 2d Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 09, 110 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)110 [arXiv:1506.03772 [hep-th]].
  39. D. Katsinis, G. Pastras and N. Tetradis, “Entanglement Entropy of a Scalar Field in a Squeezed State,” [arXiv:2403.03136 [hep-th]].
  40. M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and A. Mollabashi, “Entanglement in Lifshitz-type Quantum Field Theories,” JHEP 07, 120 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)120 [arXiv:1705.00483 [hep-th]].
  41. T. He, J. M. Magan and S. Vandoren, “Entanglement Entropy in Lifshitz Theories,” SciPost Phys. 3, no.5, 034 (2017) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.5.034 [arXiv:1705.01147 [hep-th]].
  42. N. Shiba and T. Takayanagi, “Volume Law for the Entanglement Entropy in Non-local QFTs,” JHEP 02, 033 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)033 [arXiv:1311.1643 [hep-th]].
  43. J. L. Karczmarek and C. Rabideau, “Holographic entanglement entropy in nonlocal theories,” JHEP 10, 078 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)078 [arXiv:1307.3517 [hep-th]].
  44. A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement between Two Interacting CFTs and Generalized Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 04, 185 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)185 [arXiv:1403.1393 [hep-th]].
  45. M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and A. Mollabashi, “On the Entanglement Between Interacting Scalar Field Theories,” JHEP 03, 015 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)015 [arXiv:1509.03829 [hep-th]].
  46. J. Cotler and M. T. Mueller, “Entanglement Entropy and Variational Methods: Interacting Scalar Fields,” Annals Phys. 365, 91-117 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.12.005 [arXiv:1509.05685 [hep-th]].
  47. M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar, work in progress.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free