Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The OU$^2$ process: Characterising dissipative confinement in noisy traps

Published 15 May 2024 in cond-mat.stat-mech, math-ph, and math.MP | (2405.09460v1)

Abstract: The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process describes the dynamics of Brownian particles in a confining harmonic potential, thereby constituting the paradigmatic model of overdamped, mean-reverting Langevin dynamics. Despite its widespread applicability, this model falls short when describing physical systems where the confining potential is itself subjected to stochastic fluctuations. However, such stochastic fluctuations generically emerge in numerous situations, including in the context of colloidal manipulation by optical tweezers, leading to inherently out-of-equilibrium trapped dynamics. To explore the consequences of stochasticity at this level, we introduce a natural extension of the OU process, in which the stiffness of the harmonic potential is itself subjected to OU-like fluctuations. We call this model the OU$2$ process. We examine its statistical, dynamic, and thermodynamic properties through a combination of analytical and numerical methods. Importantly, we show that the probability density for the particle position presents power-law tails, in contrast to the Gaussian decay of the standard OU process. In turn, this causes the trapping behavior, extreme value statistics, first passage statistics, and entropy production of the OU$2$ process to differ qualitatively from their standard OU counterpart. Due to the wide applicability of the standard OU process and of the proposed OU$2$ generalisation, our study sheds light on the peculiar properties of stochastic dynamics in random potentials and lays the foundation for the refined analysis of the dynamics and thermodynamics of numerous experimental systems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Uhlenbeck G E and Ornstein L S 1930 Phys. Rev. 36(5) 823–841
  2. Einstein A et al. 1905 Annalen der physik 17 208
  3. Le Bellac M and Barton G 1991 Quantum and statistical field theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
  4. Hohenberg P C and Halperin B I 1977 Rev. Mod. Phys. 49(3) 435–479
  5. Chiang R, Liu P and Okunev J 1995 Journal of Banking & Finance 19 1327–1340
  6. Alston H, Cocconi L and Bertrand T 2022 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55 274004
  7. Cocconi L, Alston H and Bertrand T 2023 Phys. Rev. Res. 5(4) 043032
  8. Manikandan S K and Krishnamurthy S 2017 The European Physical Journal B 90 1–19
  9. Lee H K, Kwon Y and Kwon C 2023 Journal of the Korean Physical Society 83 331–336
  10. Santra I, Das S and Nath S K 2021 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 54 334001
  11. Zhang Z and Wang W 2017 Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 46 4783–4794
  12. Evans M R, Majumdar S N and Schehr G 2020 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53 193001
  13. Gupta D, Plata C A and Pal A 2020 Physical review letters 124 110608
  14. Jerez M J Y, Bonachita M A and Confesor M N P 2021 Physical Review E 104 044609
  15. Guyon X, Iovleff S and Yao J F 2004 ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 8 25–35
  16. Kesten H 1973 Acta Mathematica 131 207–248
  17. Morita S 2016 Europhysics Letters 113 40007
  18. Morita S 2018 Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 87 053801
  19. Burkhardt T W 2000 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 33 L429
  20. Majumdar S N and Bray A J 2001 Physical Review Letters 86 3700
  21. Majumdar S N, Rosso A and Zoia A 2010 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43 115001
  22. Singh P 2020 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53 405005
  23. Chubynsky M V and Slater G W 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(9) 098302
  24. Sposini V, Chechkin A and Metzler R 2018 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 52 04LT01
  25. Blickle V and Bechinger C 2012 Nature Physics 8 143–146
  26. Speck T 2011 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44 305001
  27. Bothe M and Pruessner G 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103(6) 062105
  28. Pavliotis G and Stuart A 2008 Multiscale methods: averaging and homogenization (Springer Science & Business Media)
  29. Arfken G B, Weber H J and Harris F E 2011 Mathematical methods for physicists: a comprehensive guide (Academic press)
  30. Rubin K J, Pruessner G and Pavliotis G A 2014 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47 195001
  31. Majumdar S N, Pal A and Schehr G 2020 Physics Reports 840 1–32
  32. Haan L and Ferreira A 2006 Extreme value theory: an introduction vol 3 (Springer)
  33. Abkenar M, Gray T H and Zaccone A 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95(4) 042413
  34. Kramers H 1940 Physica 7 284–304 ISSN 0031-8914
  35. Hänggi P, Talkner P and Borkovec M 1990 Rev. Mod. Phys. 62(2) 251–341
  36. Reimann P 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52(2) 1579–1600
  37. Reimann P 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(23) 4576–4579
  38. Doering C R and Gadoua J C 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(16) 2318–2321
  39. Risken H and Risken H 1996 Fokker-planck equation (Springer)
  40. Gardiner C W et al. 1985 Handbook of stochastic methods vol 3 (springer Berlin)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.