Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optical Properties of Gated Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots with Trigonal Warping

Published 15 May 2024 in cond-mat.mes-hall | (2405.09725v1)

Abstract: We determine the optical properties of gated bilayer graphene quantum dots with trigonal warping (TW) of single-particle energy spectra. The lateral structure of metallic gates confines electrons and holes in a quantum dot (QD) electrostatically. The gated bilayer graphene energy spectrum is characterized by two K-valleys surrounded by three minivalleys with energies depending on the applied vertical electric field. Employing an atomistic tight-binding model, we compute the single-particle QD states and analyze the influence of TW on the energy spectrum as the lateral confining potential depth varies. We find a regime where the QD levels are dominated by the presence of three minivalleys around each K-valley. Next, we compute dipole matrix elements and analyze the oscillator strengths and optical selection rules for optical valence to conduction band transitions. We then include electron-electron interactions by first computing the microscopic Coulomb matrix elements, electron self-energy, and solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation to obtain the excitonic spectrum. Finally, we obtain the absorption spectrum for a shallow confining potential depth, which further amplifies the effects of TW on the optical properties. Our results predict the existence of two degenerate bright exciton states, each built of the three minivalley states that do not exist in the deep confinement regime, where the effects of TW are negligible.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. E. McCann, Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006).
  2. C.-H. Park and S. G. Louie, Nano letters 10, 426 (2010).
  3. J. Henriques, I. Epstein, and N. Peres, Physical Review B 105, 045411 (2022).
  4. M. O. Sauer and T. G. Pedersen, Physical Review B 105, 115416 (2022).
  5. I. Ozfidan, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Physical Review B 91, 115314 (2015).
  6. M. Korkusinski and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B 87, 115310 (2013).
  7. G. Bester, S. Nair, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 67, 161306 (2003).
  8. J. M. Pereira, P. Vasilopoulos, and F. Peeters, Nano letters 7, 946 (2007).
  9. A. Knothe and V. Fal’ko, Physical Review B 101, 235423 (2020).
  10. E. McCann and M. Koshino, Reports on Progress in physics 76, 056503 (2013).
  11. E. McCann and V. I. Fal’ko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086805 (2006).
  12. B. Partoens and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 74, 075404 (2006).
  13. A. Knothe and V. Fal’ko, Physical Review B 98, 155435 (2018).
  14. W. Que, Physical Review B 45, 11036 (1992).
  15. M. Zieliński, M. Korkusiński, and P. Hawrylak, Physical Review B 81, 085301 (2010).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.