Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An Improved Design for All-Photonic Quantum Repeaters

Published 20 May 2024 in quant-ph | (2405.11768v1)

Abstract: All-photonic quantum repeaters use multi-qubit photonic graph states, called repeater graph states (RGS), instead of matter-based quantum memories, for protection against predominantly loss errors. The RGS comprises tree-graph-encoded logical qubits for error correction at the repeaters and physical {\em link} qubits to create entanglement between neighboring repeaters. The two methods to generate the RGS are probabilistic stitching -- using linear optical Bell state measurements (fusion) -- of small entangled states prepared via multiplexed-probabilistic linear optical circuits fed with single photons, and a direct deterministic preparation using a small number of quantum-logic-capable solid-state emitters. The resource overhead due to fusions and the circuit depth of the quantum emitter system both increase with the size of the RGS. Therefore engineering a resource-efficient RGS is crucial. We propose a new RGS design, which achieves a higher entanglement rate for all-photonic quantum repeaters using fewer qubits than the previously known RGS would. We accomplish this by boosting the probability of entangling neighboring repeaters with tree-encoded link qubits. We also propose a new adaptive scheme to perform logical BSM on the link qubits for loss-only errors. The adaptive BSM outperforms the previous schemes for logical BSM on tree codes when the qubit loss probability is uniform. It reduces the number of optical modes required to perform logical BSM on link qubits to improve the entanglement rate further.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. M. Gimeno-Segovia, Towards practical linear optical quantum computing, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London (2015).
  2. D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, Physical Review Letters 95, 010501 (2005).
  3. N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Physical review letters 103, 113602 (2009).
  4. I. Tzitrin, Physical Review A 98, 032305 (2018).
  5. T. Rudolph and A. Photonics, URL http://aip. scitation. org/doi/10.1063/1.4976737 .
  6. F. Ewert and P. van Loock, Physical review letters 113, 140403 (2014).
  7. W. P. Grice, Physical Review A 84, 042331 (2011).
  8. A. Olivo and F. Grosshans, Physical Review A 98, 042323 (2018).
  9. P. G. Kwiat and H. Weinfurter, Physical Review A 58, R2623 (1998).
  10. X.-H. Li and S. Ghose, Physical Review A 96, 020303 (2017).
  11. F. Ewert and P. van Loock, Physical Review A 95, 012327 (2017).
  12. F. Schmidt and P. van Loock, Physical Review A 99, 062308 (2019).
  13. A. Patil and S. Guha, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02377  (2023).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.