Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Learning to connect in action: Measuring and understanding the emergence of boundary spanners in volatile times

Published 20 May 2024 in cs.MA | (2405.11998v1)

Abstract: Collective intelligence of diverse groups is key for tackling many of today's grand challenges such as fostering resilience and climate adaptation. Information exchange across such diverse groups is crucial for collective intelligence, especially in volatile environments. To facilitate inter-group information exchange, Informational Boundary Spanners (IBSs) as pivotal information exchange 'hubs' are promising. However, the mechanisms that drive the emergence of IBSs remain poorly understood. To address this gap there is first a need for a method to identify and measure the emergence of IBSs. Second, an Agent-Based Modelling (ABM) framework is not available to systematically study mechanisms for the emergence of IBSs in volatile environments. Third, even though the ability to learn who provides high-quality information is thought to be essential to explain the emergence of IBSs, a rigorous test of this mechanism is missing. The learning mechanism is formalized using an ABM framework, with the model's outputs analyzed using the proposed IBS emergence measurement method. To illustrate both the method and the learning mechanism, we present a case study focused on information sharing in the volatile environment of a disaster. The study shows that learning constitutes a mechanism for the emergence of effective IBSs in (a) low-volatility environments characterised by low uncertainty and (b) in high-volatility environments characterised by rapid change if the number of inter-group connections is sufficient. With the method and model, this paper aims to lay the foundations for exploring mechanisms for the emergence of IBSs that facilitate inter-group information exchange. This article advances collective intelligence by providing the essential elements for measuring and understanding the emergence of IBSs and exploring the effect of learning on their emergence in volatile environments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (74)
  1. Proceedings of IAHS 370: 15–20.
  2. Natural hazards 59: 1753–1771.
  3. Adam C and Gaudou B (2017) Modelling Human Behaviours in Disasters from Interviews: Application to Melbourne Bushfires. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 20(3): 12.
  4. Agger A and Jensen JO (2015) Area-based initiatives—and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. European Planning Studies 23(10): 2045–2061.
  5. Aldrich DP and Meyer MA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. American behavioral scientist 59(2): 254–269.
  6. Aldrich H and Herker D (1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of management review 2(2): 217–230.
  7. Altay N and Green III WG (2006) Or/ms research in disaster operations management. European journal of operational research 175(1): 475–493.
  8. Altay N and Labonte M (2014) Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: evidence from haiti. Disasters 38(s1): S50–S72.
  9. Altay N and Pal R (2013) Information Diffusion among Agents: Implications for Humanitarian Operations. Production and Operations Management 23(6): 1015–1027. 10.1111/poms.12102. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/poms.12102.
  10. Ancona DG and Caldwell D (1990) Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 1(2): 119–135.
  11. Ancona DG and Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative science quarterly : 634–665.
  12. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25(4): 557–567.
  13. Argote L (1982) Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative science quarterly : 420–434.
  14. Ballou RH (2007) The evolution and future of logistics and supply chain management. European business review 19(4): 332–348.
  15. Barabási AL and Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. science 286(5439): 509–512.
  16. Bharosa N (2011) Netcentric information orchestration: assuring information and system quality in public safety networks. PhD Thesis, BOXPress, Oisterwijk. OCLC: 840441830.
  17. Bharosa N and Janssen M (2015) Principle-Based Design: A Methodology and Principles for Capitalizing Design Experiences for Information Quality Assurance. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 12(3). 10.1515/jhsem-2014-0073. URL https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jhsem.2015.12.issue-3/jhsem-2014-0073/jhsem-2014-0073.xml.
  18. Bharosa N, Lee J and Janssen M (2010) Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontiers 12(1): 49–65. 10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z.
  19. Decision Sciences 48(5): 836–874.
  20. Castellani B, Barbrook-Johnson P and Schimpf C (2019) Case-based methods and agent-based modelling: bridging the divide to leverage their combined strengths. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22(4): 403–416.
  21. Social capital research 20(1): 1–7.
  22. Comes T (2016) Cognitive biases in humanitarian sensemaking and decision-making lessons from field research. In: 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA). IEEE, pp. 56–62.
  23. Comes T, Van de Walle B and Van Wassenhove L (2020) The coordination-information bubble in humanitarian response: theoretical foundations and empirical investigations. Production and Operations Management 29(11): 2484–2507.
  24. Management science 50(3): 352–364.
  25. Delft High Performance Computing Centre (DHPC) (2022) DelftBlue Supercomputer (Phase 1). https://www.tudelft.nl/dhpc/ark:/44463/DelftBluePhase1.
  26. Duncan R (1979) What is the right organization structure? decision tree analysis provides the answer. Organizational dynamics 7(3): 59–80.
  27. Duncan RB (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly : 313–327.
  28. Epstein JM and Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press.
  29. Fiala P (2005) Information sharing in supply chains. Omega 33(5): 419–423.
  30. Organization science 18(2): 165–180.
  31. Gölgeci I and Kuivalainen O (2020) Does social capital matter for supply chain resilience? the role of absorptive capacity and marketing-supply chain management alignment. Industrial Marketing Management 84: 63–74.
  32. Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quarterly 44(1): 82–111.
  33. Hawkins RL and Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: How social capital operated in new orleans following hurricane katrina. British Journal of Social Work 40(6): 1777–1793.
  34. Hazy JK, Tivnan BF and Schwandt DR (2003) The Impact of Boundary Spanning on Organizational Learning: Computational Explorations. Emergence 5(4): 86–123. 10.1207/s15327000em0504_7. URL https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0504_7.
  35. Strategic Management Journal 41(8): 1490–1527.
  36. Holderness T and Turpin E (2015) From social media to geosocial intelligence: Crowdsourcing civic co-management for flood response in jakarta, indonesia. Social media for government services : 115–133.
  37. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 48: 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101614. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420920300686.
  38. Kapucu N (2005) Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections 26(2): 33–48.
  39. Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American review of public administration 36(2): 207–225.
  40. Lawrence PR and Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment managing differentiation and integration.
  41. Leonard NE and Levin SA (2022) Collective intelligence as a public good. Collective Intelligence 1(1): 26339137221083293.
  42. Levina N and Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS quarterly : 335–363.
  43. Levina N and Vaast E (2006) Turning a community into a market: A practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(4): 13–37.
  44. Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at nasa: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Administrative science quarterly 63(4): 746–782.
  45. Lindgren R, Andersson M and Henfridsson O (2008) Multi-contextuality in boundary-spanning practices. Information Systems Journal 18(6): 641–661.
  46. Malone TW (2018) Superminds: The surprising power of people and computers thinking together. Little, Brown Spark.
  47. Malone TW and Bernstein MS (2022) Handbook of collective intelligence. MIT press.
  48. Malone TW and Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination 26(1): 87–119. 10.1145/174666.174668. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668.
  49. Marrone JA (2010) Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of management 36(4): 911–940.
  50. Marrone JA, Tesluk PE and Carson JB (2007) A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal 50(6): 1423–1439.
  51. Nespeca V, Comes T and Alfonso L (2018) Information Sharing and Coordination in Collaborative Flood Warning and Response Systems. In: ISD 2018 Conference Proceedings.
  52. Nespeca V, Comes T and Brazier F (2023) A Methodology to Develop Agent-Based Models for Policy Support Via Qualitative Inquiry. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 26(1): 10.
  53. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51: 101887.
  54. American Journal of Community Psychology 41(1-2): 127–150. 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6. URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6/abstract. Read.
  55. Nature Communications 14(1): 3793.
  56. Pettit TJ, Fiksel J and Croxton KL (2010) Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework. Journal of business logistics 31(1): 1–21.
  57. Nature Sustainability : 1–11.
  58. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics : 99–118.
  59. Sternberg RJ, Salter W et al. (1982) Conceptions of intelligence. Handbook of human intelligence 1: 3–28.
  60. Sutton JN, Palen L and Shklovski I (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: Emergency uses of social media in the 2007 southern california wildfires .
  61. Tasic J and Amir S (2016) Informational capital and disaster resilience: the case of jalin merapi. Disaster Prevention and Management .
  62. Information Systems Journal 27(2): 197–232.
  63. Tubaro P and Casilli AA (2010) “an ethnographic seduction”: How qualitative research and agent-based models can benefit each other. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 106(1): 59–74.
  64. Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative science quarterly : 587–605.
  65. Van de Walle B, Brugghemans B and Comes T (2016) Improving situation awareness in crisis response teams: An experimental analysis of enriched information and centralized coordination. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 95: 66–79.
  66. Van Meerkerk I and Edelenbos J (2014) The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the netherlands. Policy Sciences 47: 3–24.
  67. Van Osch W, Steinfield C and Zhao Y (2016) Towards behavioral measures of boundary spanning success: The effectiveness and efficiency of team boundary spanning in enterprise social media. Research Papers .
  68. Van Osch W and Steinfield CW (2016) Team boundary spanning: Strategic implications for the implementation and use of enterprise social media. Journal of Information Technology 31: 207–225.
  69. Watkins CJ and Dayan P (1992) Q-learning. Machine learning 8: 279–292.
  70. Watkins CJCH (1989) Learning from delayed rewards .
  71. Environmental Modelling & Software : 10452410.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104524. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815218309472.
  72. Wittenbaum GM, Vaughan SI and Strasser G (2002) Coordination in task-performing groups. Theory and research on small groups : 177–204.
  73. Wolbers J, Boersma K and Groenewegen P (2018) Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management. Organization Studies 39(11): 1521–1546.
  74. Zagorecki A, Ko K and Comfort LK (2009) Interorganizational Information Exchange and Efficiency: Organizational Performance in Emergency Environments. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(3): 3.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.