Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Entanglement-swapping in generalised probabilistic theories, and iterated CHSH games

Published 22 May 2024 in quant-ph | (2405.13819v4)

Abstract: While there exist theories that have states "more strongly entangled" than quantum theory, in the sense that they show CHSH values above Tsirelson's bound, all known examples of such theories have a strictly smaller set of measurements. Therefore, in tasks which require both bipartite states and measurements, they do not perform better than QM. One of the simplest information processing tasks involving both bipartite states and measurements is that of entanglement swapping. In this paper, we study entanglement swapping in generalised probabilistic theories (GPTs). In particular, we introduce the iterated CHSH game, which measures the power of a GPT to preserve non-classical correlations, in terms of the largest CHSH value obtainable after $n$ rounds of entanglement swapping. Our main result is the construction of a GPT that achieves a CHSH value of $4$ after an arbitrary number of rounds. This addresses a question about the optimality of quantum theory for such games recently raised by Weilenmann and Colbeck. One challenge faced when treating this problem is that there seems to be no general framework for constructing GPTs in which entanglement swapping is a well-defined operation. Therefore, we introduce an algorithmic construction that turns a bipartite GPT into a multipartite GPT that supports entanglement swapping, if consistently possible.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. L. Hardy, Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0101012  (2001), quant-ph/0101012 .
  2. M. Pawłowski and V. Scarani, Information causality, in Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils (Springer, 2015) pp. 423–438.
  3. N. Miklin and M. Pawłowski, Information causality without concatenation, Physical Review Letters 126, 220403 (2021).
  4. M. Navascués and H. Wunderlich, A glance beyond the quantum model, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466, 881 (2010).
  5. J. S. Bell, On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195 (1964).
  6. B. S. Cirel’son, Quantum generalizations of bell’s inequality, Letters in Mathematical Physics 4, 93 (1980).
  7. M. Weilenmann and R. Colbeck, Toward correlation self-testing of quantum theory in the adaptive clauser-horne-shimony-holt game, Physical Review A 102, 022203 (2020a).
  8. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Quantum nonlocality as an axiom, Foundations of Physics 24, 379 (1994).
  9. J. Barrett, Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories, Physical Review A 75, 032304 (2007).
  10. M. Plávala, General probabilistic theories: An introduction, Physics Reports 1033, 1 (2023).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.