Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Inference for Optimal Linear Treatment Regimes in Personalized Decision-making

Published 25 May 2024 in stat.ME | (2405.16161v1)

Abstract: Personalized decision-making, tailored to individual characteristics, is gaining significant attention. The optimal treatment regime aims to provide the best-expected outcome in the entire population, known as the value function. One approach to determine this optimal regime is by maximizing the Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) estimator of the value function. However, the derived treatment regime can be intricate and nonlinear, limiting their use. For clarity and interoperability, we emphasize linear regimes and determine the optimal linear regime by optimizing the AIPW estimator within set constraints. While the AIPW estimator offers a viable path to estimating the optimal regime, current methodologies predominantly focus on its asymptotic distribution, leaving a gap in studying the linear regime itself. However, there are many benefits to understanding the regime, as pinpointing significant covariates can enhance treatment effects and provide future clinical guidance. In this paper, we explore the asymptotic distribution of the estimated linear regime. Our results show that the parameter associated with the linear regime follows a cube-root convergence to a non-normal limiting distribution characterized by the maximizer of a centered Gaussian process with a quadratic drift. When making inferences for the estimated linear regimes with cube-root convergence in practical scenarios, the standard nonparametric bootstrap is invalid. As a solution, we facilitate the Cattaneo et al. (2020) bootstrap technique to provide a consistent distributional approximation for the estimated linear regimes, validated further through simulations and real-world data applications from the eICU Collaborative Research Database.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (59)
  1. On the bootstrap of the maximum score estimator. Econometrica, 73(4):1175–1204, 2005.
  2. Targeting labour market programmes-results from a randomized experiment. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 145(3):221–268, 2009.
  3. Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results. Journal of Econometrics, 186(2):345–366, 2015.
  4. Resampling fewer than n observations: gains, losses, and remedies for losses. Springer, 2012.
  5. Bootstrap-based inference for cube root asymptotics. Econometrica, 88(5):2203–2219, 2020.
  6. Targeted optimal treatment regime learning using summary statistics. Biometrika, 110(4):913–931, 2023a.
  7. Multiply robust off-policy evaluation and learning under truncation by death. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6195–6227. PMLR, 2023b.
  8. Causal inference methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies: a review. Statistical science, 39(1):165–191, 2024.
  9. A novel method for estimating optimal tree-based treatment regimes in randomized clinical trials. In ENAR Spring Meeting, Date: 2015/03/15-2015/03/18, Location: Miami, FL, USA, 2015.
  10. Maximum penalized likelihood estimation, volume 1. Springer, 2001.
  11. Off-policy deep reinforcement learning without exploration. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2052–2062. PMLR, 2019.
  12. Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. circulation, 101(23):e215–e220, 2000.
  13. Ultrafiltration for management of fluid overload in patients with heart failure. Artificial organs, 44(2):129–139, 2020.
  14. The numerical bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics, 48(1):397 – 412, 2020. 10.1214/19-AOS1812.
  15. Joel L Horowitz. Semiparametric and nonparametric methods in econometrics, volume 12. Springer, 2009.
  16. Doubly robust off-policy value evaluation for reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning, pages 652–661. PMLR, 2016.
  17. A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimedia tools and applications, 80:8091–8126, 2021.
  18. Edward H Kennedy. Semiparametric theory and empirical processes in causal inference. Statistical causal inferences and their applications in public health research, pages 141–167, 2016.
  19. Cube root asymptotics. The Annals of Statistics, pages 191–219, 1990.
  20. Michael R Kosorok. Introduction to empirical processes and semiparametric inference, volume 61. Springer, 2008.
  21. Doubly robust estimators for generalizing treatment effects on survival outcomes from randomized controlled trials to a target population. Journal of causal inference, 10(1):415–440, 2022.
  22. Improving trial generalizability using observational studies. Biometrics, 79(2):1213–1225, 2023.
  23. Transporting survival of an hiv clinical trial to the external target populations. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, pages 1–22, 2024a.
  24. genrct: a statistical analysis framework for generalizing rct findings to real-world population. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, pages 1–20, 2024b.
  25. On m out of n bootstrapping for nonstandard m-estimation with nuisance parameters. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(475):1185–1197, 2006.
  26. On the bootstrap in cube root asymptotics. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 34(1):29–44, 2006.
  27. Alexander R Luedtke and Mark J van der Laan. Super-learning of an optimal dynamic treatment rule. The international journal of biostatistics, 12(1):305–332, 2016.
  28. Genetic optimization using derivatives: the rgenoud package for r. Journal of Statistical Software, 42:1–26, 2011.
  29. The optimal dynamic treatment rule superlearner: considerations, performance, and application. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.12326, 2021.
  30. Robert S Munford. Severe sepsis and septic shock: the role of gram-negative bacteremia. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis., 1:467–496, 2006.
  31. Safe and efficient off-policy reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  32. Susan A Murphy. Optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 65(2):331–355, 2003.
  33. A generalization error for q-learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(7), 2005.
  34. Fluid overload as a therapeutic target for the preservative management of chronic kidney disease. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 29(1):22–28, 2020.
  35. eicu collaborative research database (version 2.0). PhysioNet. Published online, 2019.
  36. The eicu collaborative research database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Scientific data, 5(1):1–13, 2018.
  37. Targeted learning in observational studies with multi-valued treatments: An evaluation of antipsychotic drug treatment safety. Statistics in Medicine, 2024.
  38. Performance guarantees for individualized treatment rules. The Annals of Statistics, 39(2):1180, 2011.
  39. Donald B Rubin. Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, pages 34–58, 1978.
  40. F Schortgen. Fever in sepsis. Minerva anestesiologica, 78(11):1254–1264, 2012.
  41. Local m-estimation with discontinuous criterion for dependent and limited observations. The Annals of Statistics, 46(1):344–369, 2018.
  42. High-dimensional a-learning for optimal dynamic treatment regimes. The Annals of Statistics, 46(3):925, 2018.
  43. Charles J Stone. Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression. The Annals of Statistics, pages 1040–1053, 1982.
  44. Hypovolemic shock. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2022.
  45. Kunio Takezawa. Introduction to nonparametric regression. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  46. Ralph Turvey. Optimal Pricing and Investment in Electricity Supply: An Esay in Applied Welfare Economics. Routledge, 2017.
  47. Mark J van der Laan and Alexander R Luedtke. Targeted learning of the mean outcome under an optimal dynamic treatment rule. Journal of causal inference, 3(1):61–95, 2015.
  48. Quantile-optimal treatment regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523):1243–1254, 2018.
  49. Q-learning. Machine learning, 8:279–292, 1992.
  50. Integrative r𝑟ritalic_r-learner of heterogeneous treatment effects combining experimental and observational studies. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pages 904–926. PMLR, 2022.
  51. Transfer learning of individualized treatment rules from experimental to real-world data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 32(3):1036–1045, 2023.
  52. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes: an application of the parametric g-formula. Statistics in Biosciences, 3:119–143, 2011.
  53. A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes. Biometrics, 68(4):1010–1018, 2012.
  54. Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes. Biometrics, 71(4):895–904, 2015.
  55. Interpretable dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(524):1541–1549, 2018.
  56. Individualized fluid administration for critically ill patients with sepsis with an interpretable dynamic treatment regimen model. Scientific Reports, 10(1):17874, 2020.
  57. Positivity-free policy learning with observational data. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1918–1926. PMLR, 2024.
  58. New statistical learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(510):583–598, 2015.
  59. Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(499):1106–1118, 2012.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.