Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Nonparametric FBST for Validating Linear Models

Published 21 Jun 2024 in stat.ME | (2406.15608v1)

Abstract: The Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) possesses many desirable aspects, such as not requiring a non-zero prior probability for hypotheses while also producing a measure of evidence for $H_0$. Still, few attempts have been made to bring the FBST to nonparametric settings, with the main drawback being the need to obtain the highest posterior density (HPD) in a function space. In this work, we use Gaussian processes to provide an analytically tractable FBST for hypotheses of the type $$ H_0: g(\boldsymbol{x}) = \boldsymbol{b}(\boldsymbol{x})\boldsymbol{\beta}, \quad \forall \boldsymbol{x} \in \mathcal{X}, \quad \boldsymbol{\beta} \in \mathbb{R}k, $$ where $g(\cdot)$ is the regression function, $\boldsymbol{b}(\cdot)$ is a vector of linearly independent linear functions -- such as $\boldsymbol{b}(\boldsymbol{x}) = \boldsymbol{x}'$ -- and $\mathcal{X}$ is the covariates' domain. We also make use of pragmatic hypotheses to verify if the adherence of linear models may be approximately instead of exactly true, allowing for the inclusion of valuable information such as measurement errors and utility judgments. This contribution extends the theory of the FBST, allowing its application in nonparametric settings and providing a procedure that easily tests if linear models are adequate for the data and that can automatically perform variable selection.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.