Constant Directivity Loudspeaker Beamforming
Abstract: Loudspeaker array beamforming is a common signal processing technique for acoustic directivity control and robust audio reproduction. Unlike their microphone counterpart, loudspeaker constraints are often heterogeneous due to arrayed transducers with varying operating ranges in frequency, acoustic-electrical sensitivity, efficiency, and directivity. This work proposes a frequency-regularization method for generalized Rayleigh quotient directivity specifications and two novel beamformer designs that optimize for maximum efficiency constant directivity (MECD) and maximum sensitivity constant directivity (MSCD). We derive fast converging and analytic solutions from their quadratic equality constrained quadratic program formulations. Experiments optimize generalized directivity index constrained beamformer designs for a full-band heterogeneous array.
- G. Huang, J. Chen, and J. Benesty, “Insights into frequency-invariant beamforming with concentric circular microphone arrays,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process., vol. 26, no. 12, 2018.
- F. Zotter, H. Pomberger, and A. Schmeder, “Efficient directivity pattern control for spherical loudspeaker arrays,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 123, no. 5, p. 3643, 2008.
- J. Wang, W. Zhang, C. Pan, J. Chen, and J. Benesty, “On the design of differential loudspeaker arrays with broadside radiation patterns,” JASA Express Letters, vol. 1, no. 8, 2021.
- F. Miotello, A. Bernardini, D. Albertini, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti, “Steerable first-order differential loudspeaker arrays with monopole and dipole elements,” in Convention of the European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum, 2023, pp. 11–15.
- R. Berkun, I. Cohen, and J. Benesty, “Combined beamformers for robust broadband regularized superdirective beamforming,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process., vol. 23, no. 5, 2015.
- M. Crocco and A. Trucco, “Design of robust superdirective arrays with a tunable tradeoff between directivity and frequency-invariance,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, no. 5, 2011.
- L. C. Parra, “Steerable frequency-invariant beamforming for arbitrary arrays,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 3839–3847, 2006.
- Y. Luo, “Spherical harmonic covariance and magnitude function encodings for beamformer design,” EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2021, pp. 1–17, 2021.
- J. Platt and A. Barr, “Constrained differential optimization,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, D. Anderson, Ed., vol. 0. American Institute of Physics, 1987.
- W. Gander, “Least squares with a quadratic constraint,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 36, pp. 291–307, 1980.
- G. H. Golub, “Some modified matrix eigenvalue problems,” SIAM Review, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 330, 1973.
- A. Shapiro, “Rank-reducibility of a symmetric matrix and sampling theory of minimum trace factor analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 47, pp. 187–199, 1982.
- A. I. Barvinok, “Problems of distance geometry and convex properties of quadratic maps,” Discrete & Computational Geometry, vol. 13, pp. 189–202, 1995.
- G. Pataki, “On the rank of extreme matrices in semidefinite programs and the multiplicity of optimal eigenvalues,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 23, 05 1998.
- W. Gander, G. H. Golub, and U. Von Matt, “A constrained eigenvalue problem,” Linear Algebra and its applications, vol. 114, pp. 815–839, 1989.
- R. P. Brent, “An algorithm with guaranteed convergence for finding a zero of a function,” The Computer Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, 1971.
- K.-C. Toh, M. J. Todd, and R. H. Tütüncü, “SDPT3 — a matlab software package for semidefinite programming, version 1.3,” Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1-4, pp. 545–581, 1999.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.