Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A Heterogeneous Network-based Contrastive Learning Approach for Predicting Drug-Target Interaction

Published 20 Oct 2024 in q-bio.BM and cs.LG | (2411.00801v1)

Abstract: Drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction is crucial for drug development and repositioning. Methods using heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs) for DTI prediction have become a promising approach, with attention-based models often achieving excellent performance. However, these methods typically overlook edge features when dealing with heterogeneous biomedical networks. We propose a heterogeneous network-based contrastive learning method called HNCL-DTI, which designs a heterogeneous graph attention network to predict potential/novel DTIs. Specifically, our HNCL-DTI utilizes contrastive learning to collaboratively learn node representations from the perspective of both node-based and edge-based attention within the heterogeneous structure of biomedical networks. Experimental results show that HNCL-DTI outperforms existing advanced baseline methods on benchmark datasets, demonstrating strong predictive ability and practical effectiveness. The data and source code are available at https://github.com/Zaiwen/HNCL-DTI.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. N. Nosengo, “Can you teach old drugs new tricks?” Nature, vol. 534, no. 7607, pp. 314–316, 2016.
  2. K. Y. Gao, A. Fokoue, H. Luo, A. Iyengar, S. Dey, P. Zhang et al., “Interpretable drug target prediction using deep neural representation.” in IJCAI, vol. 2018, 2018, pp. 3371–3377.
  3. K. Huang, C. Xiao, L. M. Glass, and J. Sun, “Moltrans: molecular interaction transformer for drug–target interaction prediction,” Bioinformatics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 830–836, 2021.
  4. T. Nguyen, H. Le, T. P. Quinn, T. Nguyen, T. D. Le, and S. Venkatesh, “Graphdta: predicting drug–target binding affinity with graph neural networks,” Bioinformatics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1140–1147, 2021.
  5. Y. Chu, X. Shan, T. Chen, M. Jiang, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, D. R. Salahub, Y. Xiong, and D.-Q. Wei, “Dti-mlcd: predicting drug-target interactions using multi-label learning with community detection method,” Briefings in bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 3, p. bbaa205, 2021.
  6. M. F. Adasme, D. Parisi, A. Sveshnikova, and M. Schroeder, “Structure-based drug repositioning: potential and limits,” in Seminars in cancer biology, vol. 68.   Elsevier, 2021, pp. 192–198.
  7. Y. Luo, X. Zhao, J. Zhou, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, W. Kuang, J. Peng, L. Chen, and J. Zeng, “A network integration approach for drug-target interaction prediction and computational drug repositioning from heterogeneous information,” Nature communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 573, 2017.
  8. F. Wan, L. Hong, A. Xiao, T. Jiang, and J. Zeng, “Neodti: neural integration of neighbor information from a heterogeneous network for discovering new drug–target interactions,” Bioinformatics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2019.
  9. T. Zhao, Y. Hu, L. R. Valsdottir, T. Zang, and J. Peng, “Identifying drug–target interactions based on graph convolutional network and deep neural network,” Briefings in bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 2141–2150, 2021.
  10. Y. Li, G. Qiao, X. Gao, and G. Wang, “Supervised graph co-contrastive learning for drug–target interaction prediction,” Bioinformatics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2847–2854, 2022.
  11. M. Li, X. Cai, L. Li, S. Xu, and H. Ji, “Heterogeneous graph attention network for drug-target interaction prediction,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2022, pp. 1166–1176.
  12. G. M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom, M. F. Sanner, R. K. Belew, D. S. Goodsell, and A. J. Olson, “Autodock4 and autodocktools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility,” Journal of computational chemistry, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 2785–2791, 2009.
  13. M. J. Keiser, B. L. Roth, B. N. Armbruster, P. Ernsberger, J. J. Irwin, and B. K. Shoichet, “Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2007.
  14. D. Zhou, Z. Xu, W. Li, X. Xie, and S. Peng, “Multidti: drug–target interaction prediction based on multi-modal representation learning to bridge the gap between new chemical entities and known heterogeneous network,” Bioinformatics, vol. 37, no. 23, pp. 4485–4492, 2021.
  15. J. Li, J. Wang, H. Lv, Z. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Imchgan: inductive matrix completion with heterogeneous graph attention networks for drug-target interactions prediction,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 655–665, 2021.
  16. D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, “Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus),” arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289, 2015.
  17. A. L. Maas, A. Y. Hannun, A. Y. Ng et al., “Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models,” in Proc. icml, vol. 30, no. 1.   Atlanta, GA, 2013, p. 3.
  18. A. v. d. Oord, Y. Li, and O. Vinyals, “Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018.
  19. M. Schlichtkrull, T. N. Kipf, P. Bloem, R. Van Den Berg, I. Titov, and M. Welling, “Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks,” in The semantic web: 15th international conference, ESWC 2018, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 3–7, 2018, proceedings 15.   Springer, 2018, pp. 593–607.
  20. Z. Hu, Y. Dong, K. Wang, and Y. Sun, “Heterogeneous graph transformer,” in Proceedings of the web conference 2020, 2020, pp. 2704–2710.
  21. Q. Lv, M. Ding, Q. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Feng, S. He, C. Zhou, J. Jiang, Y. Dong, and J. Tang, “Are we really making much progress? revisiting, benchmarking and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2021, pp. 1150–1160.
  22. Z. Zhao, C. He, Y. Qu, H. Zheng, L. Duan, and J. Zuo, “Mgdti: Graph transformer with meta-learning for drug-target interaction prediction,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 801–806.
  23. E. Rinott, E. Kozer, Y. Shapira, A. Bar-Haim, and I. Youngster, “Ibuprofen use and clinical outcomes in covid-19 patients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1259–e5, 2020.
  24. B. M. Tomazini, I. S. Maia, A. B. Cavalcanti, O. Berwanger, R. G. Rosa, V. C. Veiga, A. Avezum, R. D. Lopes, F. R. Bueno, M. V. A. Silva et al., “Effect of dexamethasone on days alive and ventilator-free in patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and covid-19: the codex randomized clinical trial,” Jama, vol. 324, no. 13, pp. 1307–1316, 2020.
  25. S. Meo, D. Klonoff, and J. Akram, “Efficacy of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of covid-19.” European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 24, no. 8, 2020.
  26. A. Papamanoli, J. Yoo, P. Grewal, W. Predun, J. Hotelling, R. Jacob, A. Mojahedi, H. A. Skopicki, M. Mansour, L. A. Marcos et al., “High-dose methylprednisolone in nonintubated patients with severe covid-19 pneumonia,” European journal of clinical investigation, vol. 51, no. 2, p. e13458, 2021.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.