Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimizing Multi-Scale Representations to Detect Effect Heterogeneity Using Earth Observation and Computer Vision: Applications to Two Anti-Poverty RCTs

Published 4 Nov 2024 in stat.ML and cs.LG | (2411.02134v2)

Abstract: Earth Observation (EO) data are increasingly used in policy analysis by enabling granular estimation of conditional average treatment effects (CATE). However, a challenge in EO-based causal inference is determining the scale of the input satellite imagery -- balancing the trade-off between capturing fine-grained individual heterogeneity in smaller images and broader contextual information in larger ones. This paper introduces Multi-Scale Representation Concatenation, a set of composable procedures that transform arbitrary single-scale EO-based CATE estimation algorithms into multi-scale ones. We benchmark the performance of Multi-Scale Representation Concatenation on a CATE estimation pipeline that combines Vision Transformer (ViT) models (which encode images) with Causal Forests (CFs) to obtain CATE estimates from those encodings. We first perform simulation studies where the causal mechanism is known, showing that our multi-scale approach captures information relevant to effect heterogeneity that single-scale ViT models fail to capture as measured by $R2$. We then apply the multi-scale method to two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in Peru and Uganda using Landsat satellite imagery. As we do not have access to ground truth CATEs in the RCT analysis, the Rank Average Treatment Effect Ratio (RATE Ratio) measure is employed to assess performance. Results indicate that Multi-Scale Representation Concatenation improves the performance of deep learning models in EO-based CATE estimation without the complexity of designing new multi-scale architectures for a specific use case. The application of Multi-Scale Representation Concatenation could have meaningful policy benefits -- e.g., potentially increasing the impact of poverty alleviation programs without additional resource expenditure.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. Earth observation in service of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Geo-spatial Information Science, 20(2):77–96, 2017.
  2. Clip-rsicd v2. https://huggingface.co/flax-community/clip-rsicd-v2, 2021.
  3. Estimating treatment effects with causal forests: An application, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07409.
  4. Susan Athey et al. The impact of machine learning on economics. The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, pages 507–547, 2018.
  5. A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science, 348(6236):1260799, 2015. 10.1126/science.1260799. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1260799.
  6. The long-term impacts of grants on poverty: Nine-year evidence from uganda’s youth opportunities program. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(3):287–304, 2020.
  7. Using Satellite Imagery to Understand and Promote Sustainable Development. Science, 371(6535), March 2021. ISSN 0036-8075, 1095-9203. 10.1126/science.abe8628. URL https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.abe8628.
  8. Scale-invariance as a unifying psychological principle. Cognition, 69(3):B17–B24, 1999. 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00066-3.
  9. Attention to scale: Scale-aware semantic image segmentation, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03339.
  10. Applied causal inference powered by ml and ai, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02467.
  11. The data efficiency of deep learning is degraded by unnecessary input dimensions. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 16, 2022. ISSN 1662-5188. 10.3389/fncom.2022.760085. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2022.760085.
  12. Statistical Modeling: The Three Cultures. Harvard Data Science Review, 5(1), January 2023. ISSN 2644-2353, 2688-8513. 10.1162/99608f92.89f6fe66.
  13. The impact of austerity on children: Uncovering effect heterogeneity by political, economic, and family factors in low- and middle-income countries. Social Science Research, 118:102973, February 2024. ISSN 0049-089X. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102973.
  14. Using Satellite Images and Deep Learning to Measure Health and Living Standards in India. Social Indicators Research, 167(1):475–505, June 2023. ISSN 1573-0921. 10.1007/s11205-023-03112-x. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03112-x.
  15. Understanding the Impacts of Crop Diversification in the Context of Climate Change: A Machine Learning Approach, July 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08617. arXiv:2307.08617 [cs, q-bio] version: 1.
  16. Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083.
  17. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation, 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2524.
  18. On the Use of Satellite-Based Vehicle Flows Data to Assess Local Economic Activity: The Case of Philippine Cities, March 2022. URL https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4057690.
  19. Multi-scale orderless pooling of deep convolutional activation features, 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1840.
  20. Scale and translation-invariance for novel objects in human vision. Scientific Reports, 10(1):1411, January 2020. ISSN 2045-2322. 10.1038/s41598-019-57261-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57261-6.
  21. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770–778, 2016. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
  22. Geoffrey Hinton. How to represent part-whole hierarchies in a neural network, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12627.
  23. Paul W. Holland. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396):945–960, 1986. ISSN 01621459, 1537274X. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2289064.
  24. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis, 2016.
  25. Scale-Invariant Scale-Channel Networks: Deep Networks That Generalise to Previously Unseen Scales. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 64(5):506–536, June 2022. ISSN 1573-7683. 10.1007/s10851-022-01082-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-022-01082-2.
  26. Image-based treatment effect heterogeneity. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning (CLeaR), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR), 213:531–552, 2023.
  27. Multiscale representation learning for image classification: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(1):23–43, 2023. 10.1109/TAI.2021.3135248.
  28. A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of health: Trends and research prospects. SSM - Population Health, 15:100836, September 2021. ISSN 2352-8273. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100836. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321001117.
  29. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436–444, 2015.
  30. Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018.
  31. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14030.
  32. Exploring models and data for remote sensing image caption generation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(4):2183–2195, 2017. 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2776321.
  33. Time Series of Satellite Imagery Improve Deep Learning Estimates of Neighborhood-level Poverty in Africa. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 6165–6173, 2023.
  34. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  35. Scale-mae: A scale-aware masked autoencoder for multiscale geospatial representation learning, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14532.
  36. Patrick Rehill. How do applied researchers use the causal forest? a methodological review of a method, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13356.
  37. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01497.
  38. A scoping review of earth observation and machine learning for causal inference: Implications for the geography of poverty, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02584.
  39. Batkhurel Serdavaa. A Satellite Image Analysis on Housing Conditions and the Effectiveness of the Affordable Housing Mortgage Program in Mongolia: A Deep Learning Approach, December 2023. URL https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4664966.
  40. Uncovering Heterogeneous Associations Between Disaster-Related Trauma and Subsequent Functional Limitations: A Machine-Learning Approach. American Journal of Epidemiology, page kwac187, October 2022. ISSN 0002-9262. 10.1093/aje/kwac187.
  41. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03314.
  42. Qini curves for multi-armed treatment rules, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11979.
  43. Going deeper with convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.4842, 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4842.
  44. Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01601.
  45. A Confounder-Free Fusion Network for Aerial Image Scene Feature Representation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15:5440–5454, 2022. ISSN 2151-1535. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3189052. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9817622. Conference Name: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.
  46. Evaluating treatment prioritization rules via rank-weighted average treatment effects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07966, 2021.
  47. Image data augmentation for deep learning: A survey, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08610.
  48. Vision transformers for dense prediction: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, 253:109552, 2022. ISSN 0950-7051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109552. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705122007821.

Summary

  • The paper presents a multi-scale concatenation method that enhances CATE estimation using EO data.
  • It leverages pre-trained image features and Causal Forest models to capture both individual-level and contextual treatment effects.
  • Empirical tests on RCT data from Peru and Uganda validate its improved detection of effect heterogeneity.

Encoding Multi-level Dynamics in Effect Heterogeneity Estimation in Earth Observation Data

This paper presents a methodological advancement in Earth's observation (EO) data-driven causal inference by introducing a procedure called Multi-scale Concatenation, aimed at improving Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation. The proposed approach seeks to address the inherent trade-offs in single-scale analysis by incorporating multi-level dynamics—capturing both fine-grained individual-level effects and broader contextual information—through transformation of single-scale Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) estimating algorithms into multi-scale algorithms.

Problem Setting

The use of EO data in policy analysis often revolves around estimating treatment effects at varying granularities, which are crucial for understanding effects related to environmental conditions, land use, and socio-economic factors. Traditional approaches in EO-based causal inference struggle with balancing the need for both localized individual heterogeneity and broader contextual information. Multi-level dynamics, therefore, necessitate efficient methodologies that leverage this multi-scale information effectively without losing critical information related to individual treatment effects.

Contributions

Multi-scale Concatenation is introduced as a family of composable procedures that enhance the robustness and efficacy of single-scale CATE estimation algorithms. By systematically varying the image sizes and concatenating image representations, this approach enables deep learning models to leverage EO data more effectively, capturing multi-level dynamics without requiring innovative architecture designs specific to complex datasets.

Methodology

The core of the methodology involves:

  • Data Representation: Leveraging pre-trained models such as CLIP-RSICD to extract multi-scale image features, accommodating both a household-specific and neighborhood-level context.
  • CATE Estimation: Utilizing Causal Forest, a well-established model for unconfounded settings, to estimate CATEs from the feature representation.
  • Quantification and Evaluation: Employing the Rank Average Treatment Effect Ratio (RATE Ratio) to gauge model performance in capturing effect heterogeneity, which is crucial given the absence of ground-truth treatment effects in many real-world datasets.

Through this framework, the researchers aim to harness the power of large, high-dimensional EO data while mitigating the overfitting risks inherent in single-scale approaches.

Empirical Results

The proposed methodology demonstrates superiority in datasets sampled from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in Peru and Uganda. Strong improvements in heterogeneity signal were evidenced, with the multi-scale approach capturing intricate details critical for accurate treatment effect estimation. Notably, empirical evaluations outline that the largest image context does not necessarily yield the most reliable heterogeneity signal, highlighting the potential of smaller, more contextually appropriate image scales in EO-based analysis.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this study are significant within the realms of causal inference and EO data utility. Multi-scale Concatenation provides a pathway towards more accurate and contextually nuanced CATE estimations, which is pivotal for poverty alleviation and sustainable development policy-making. Furthermore, the acknowledgment of spatial limitations and the theoretical potential for adaptive scale selection underscore areas for further exploration—specifically, advancements in adaptive multi-scale methods and the interplay between image resolution and CATE estimation reliability.

In conclusion, this research offers a substantive methodological contribution to the field by effectively addressing the intersection of deep learning and causal inference in EO data contexts, charting a course for further AI-driven advancements in public policy and social sciences.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 7 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free