Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

SEAL: Entangled White-box Watermarks on Low-Rank Adaptation

Published 16 Jan 2025 in cs.AI and cs.CR | (2501.09284v2)

Abstract: Recently, LoRA and its variants have become the de facto strategy for training and sharing task-specific versions of large pretrained models, thanks to their efficiency and simplicity. However, the issue of copyright protection for LoRA weights, especially through watermark-based techniques, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose SEAL (SEcure wAtermarking on LoRA weights), the universal whitebox watermarking for LoRA. SEAL embeds a secret, non-trainable matrix between trainable LoRA weights, serving as a passport to claim ownership. SEAL then entangles the passport with the LoRA weights through training, without extra loss for entanglement, and distributes the finetuned weights after hiding the passport. When applying SEAL, we observed no performance degradation across commonsense reasoning, textual/visual instruction tuning, and text-to-image synthesis tasks. We demonstrate that SEAL is robust against a variety of known attacks: removal, obfuscation, and ambiguity attacks.

Summary

  • The paper introduces SEAL, a novel white-box watermarking scheme that embeds a secret passport matrix within LoRA weights during training to protect intellectual property.
  • SEAL's passport-based method integrates a non-trainable matrix, becoming entangled with trainable LoRA weights, ensuring robustness against white-box attacks without requiring additional entanglement loss.
  • Experimental results show SEAL causes no performance degradation on various tasks and models like LLaMA-2 and Mistral-7B, while effectively resisting removal and obfuscation attacks.

Overview of SEAL: Entangled White-box Watermarks on Low-Rank Adaptation

The paper "SEAL: Entangled White-box Watermarks on Low-Rank Adaptation" addresses a pivotal issue in the field of deep learning, specifically concerning the protection of intellectual property (IP) associated with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) weights. LoRA has gained prominence as a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, especially for adapting large pretrained models like LLMs and Diffusion Models (DMs) to specific tasks. Despite the widespread use and open distribution of LoRA weights, the paper identifies a gap in methods dedicated to protecting these weights from unauthorized use, particularly through watermarking techniques.

The authors introduce SEAL (SEcure wAtermarking on LoRA), a novel white-box watermarking scheme specifically designed for protecting LoRA weights. SEAL embeds a secret, non-trainable matrix called a passport between the trainable LoRA weights during training. This matrix acts as a hidden identity marker to assert ownership of the model's adaptations. The watermark embeds deeply into the model parameters, becoming entangled with the LoRA weights through the fine-tuning process, and remains resistant to removal, obfuscation, and ambiguity attacks without incurring performance degradation on the model's primary tasks.

Methodological Insights

SEAL employs a passport-based watermarking approach, distinct from conventional weight-, activation-, or output-based methods. It relies on integrating a constant matrix between the trainable components of the LoRA framework, thus entwining the watermark during the model's training. This method ensures the watermark maintains integrity even if adversarial entities have white-box access to the model, an environment where the adversary views the model's internal workings.

A critical aspect of SEAL's methodology is the lack of necessity for additional entanglement loss during training, which differentiates it from other passport-based methods that may require extra loss terms to strengthen the watermark embedding. This setup simplifies the training process and avoids performance penalties often associated with such constraints.

Experimental Results

The paper reports that integrating SEAL into the training process results in no degradation across various tasks, including commonsense reasoning, textual instruction tuning, visual instruction tuning, and text-to-image synthesis tasks. This was evident in experiments conducted with notable open-source models such as LLaMA-2 and Mistral-7B. Noteworthy is that SEAL often matches or even exceeds baseline LoRA performance on these tasks, demonstrating its efficacy in preserving host-task fidelity.

SEAL was subjected to various attacks resembling those likely encountered in practical scenarios. For instance, under removal attacks aiming to nullify the watermark by modifying model weights, SEAL retained robustness, evidenced by significantly decreased model performance when attempts to remove the watermark were made. Similarly, SEAL effectively resisted obfuscation, where adversaries might structurally alter the model while retaining its output functionality.

Future Directions and Implications

The implications of SEAL are substantial as it paves the way for secure sharing of LoRA-adapted models among research and commercial entities while protecting proprietary innovations embedded within these adaptations. The ability to assert ownership over model tuning components allows for greater openness in research collaborations and model-sharing initiatives while mitigating the risk of unauthorized redistribution.

Future research can explore extending SEAL's principles to other forms of parameter-efficient fine-tuning beyond the LoRA framework. Additionally, given SEAL's resilience against sophisticated attacks in white-box settings, further investigations could consider scenarios involving more dynamic layers of attack, such as those involving model inversion or extraction techniques.

In conclusion, SEAL offers a robust, efficient, and theoretically grounded solution for protecting IP associated with adaptable neural network weights. Its introduction underscores the growing necessity for security-oriented methodologies in the future landscape of AI, where model sharing and collaboration must be balanced with lawful intellectual property considerations.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.