On the Length of a Maximal Subgroup of a Finite Group
Abstract: For a finite group $G$ and its maximal subgroup $M$ we proved that the generalized Fitting height of $M$ can't be less by 2 than the generalized Fitting height of $G$ and the non-$p$-soluble length of $M$ can't be less by 1 than the non-$p$-soluble length of $G$. We constructed a hereditary saturated formation $\mathfrak{F}$ such that ${n_\sigma(G, \mathfrak{F})-n_\sigma(M, \mathfrak{F})\mid G$ is finite $\sigma$-soluble and $M$ is a maximal subgroup of $G}=\mathbb{N}\cup{0}$ where $n_\sigma(G, \mathfrak{F})$ denotes the $\sigma$-nilpotent length of the $\mathfrak{F}$-residual of $G$. This construction shows the results about the generalized lengths of maximal subgroups published in Math. Nachr. (1994) and Mathematics (2020) are not correct.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.