Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Search for the possible members of the open cluster NGC 3532 with poor astrometric solutions of Gaia DR3

Published 20 Apr 2025 in astro-ph.GA | (2504.14672v1)

Abstract: We performed star counts in the region of the open cluster NGC 3532. The ranges of trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions containing all the stars of the cluster were determined using the stars with 5- and 6-parameter Gaia DR3 solutions. The estimated radius of the cluster was R_c=178+-3 arcminutes and the number of cluster stars was N_c=2200+-40. We estimate the number of stars with poor astrometric solutions that may be members of the cluster. For this purpose, we analyze the surface density distribution of stars with two-parameter Gaia DR3 solutions, stars with the parameter RUWE>1.4, and stars with large relative errors of trigonometric parallaxes in the vicinity of the cluster. We are looking for stars that fall within the area of the color-magnitude diagram occupied by probable members of the NGC 3532 cluster from the Hant&Reffert sample. The radial surface density profile plotted with such stars shows the concentration of stars toward the cluster center. An analysis of the profile yields an estimate of 2150+-230 stars that may be cluster members. Thus, nearly one half of cluster members can be lost when the probable members are selected only by exact astrometric data of Gaia DR3. Among these lost stars, there may be a significant number of unresolved binary and multiple systems.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.