Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Treewidth versus clique number. V. Further connections with tree-independence number

Published 19 May 2025 in math.CO | (2505.12866v1)

Abstract: We continue the study of $(tw,\omega)$-bounded graph classes, that is, hereditary graph classes in which large treewidth is witnessed by the presence of a large clique, and the relation of this property to boundedness of the tree-independence number, a graph parameter introduced independently by Yolov in 2018 and by Dallard, Milani\v{c}, and \v{S}torgel in 2024. Dallard et al. showed that bounded tree-independence number is sufficient for $(tw,\omega)$-boundedness, and conjectured that the converse holds. While this conjecture has been recently disproved, it is still interesting to determine classes where the conjecture holds; for example, the conjecture is still open for graph classes excluding an induced star, as well as for finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs. In this paper, we identify further families of graph classes where $(tw,\omega)$-boundedness is equivalent to bounded tree-independence number. We settle a number of cases of finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs, obtain several equivalent characterizations of $(tw, \omega)$-boundedness in subclasses of the class of complements of line graphs, and give a short proof of a recent result of Ahn, Gollin, Huynh, and Kwon [SODA 2025] establishing bounded tree-independence number for graphs excluding a fixed induced star and a fixed number of independent cycles.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.