Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Policy Newton Algorithm in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

Published 2 Jun 2025 in cs.LG and cs.AI | (2506.01597v1)

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) policies represented in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) offer powerful representational capabilities. While second-order optimization methods like Newton's method demonstrate faster convergence than first-order approaches, current RKHS-based policy optimization remains constrained to first-order techniques. This limitation stems primarily from the intractability of explicitly computing and inverting the infinite-dimensional Hessian operator in RKHS. We introduce Policy Newton in RKHS, the first second-order optimization framework specifically designed for RL policies represented in RKHS. Our approach circumvents direct computation of the inverse Hessian operator by optimizing a cubic regularized auxiliary objective function. Crucially, we leverage the Representer Theorem to transform this infinite-dimensional optimization into an equivalent, computationally tractable finite-dimensional problem whose dimensionality scales with the trajectory data volume. We establish theoretical guarantees proving convergence to a local optimum with a local quadratic convergence rate. Empirical evaluations on a toy financial asset allocation problem validate these theoretical properties, while experiments on standard RL benchmarks demonstrate that Policy Newton in RKHS achieves superior convergence speed and higher episodic rewards compared to established first-order RKHS approaches and parametric second-order methods. Our work bridges a critical gap between non-parametric policy representations and second-order optimization methods in reinforcement learning.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a second-order optimization method leveraging RKHS and the Representer Theorem to enable tractable, finite-dimensional policy optimization in reinforcement learning.
  • It addresses infinite-dimensional Hessian challenges using a cubic regularized objective, achieving local quadratic convergence for faster updates.
  • Empirical validation on benchmarks like CartPole and Lunar Lander demonstrates improved convergence speed and higher rewards compared to first-order methods.

Policy Newton Algorithm in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

The paper "Policy Newton Algorithm in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space" introduces a second-order optimization framework for reinforcement learning (RL) policies within Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS). This paper addresses the computational challenges associated with RKHS-based policy optimization, offering a novel approach that leverages the Representer Theorem for tractable, finite-dimensional optimization.

Introduction to RKHS and Policy Optimization

RKHS offers a flexible, non-parametric policy representation in RL, enhancing sample efficiency and adaptability across various RL domains. The standard RKHS Policy Gradient methods face convergence limitations due to their first-order nature, particularly in complex problem environments characterized by high curvature. Second-order methods, such as the Policy Newton algorithm, integrate Hessian curvature information to achieve faster convergence and appropriately scaled updates, making them suitable candidates for accelerating RKHS policy optimization.

Challenges and Solution with Policy Newton in RKHS

Developing a Policy Newton method in RKHS involves significant challenges, particularly due to the infinite-dimensional nature of the Hessian operator. This paper circumvents the explicit computation of the Hessian's inverse by introducing a cubic regularized auxiliary objective function. This transformation utilizes the Representer Theorem to convert the infinite-dimensional optimization problem into a tractable finite-dimensional problem, whose dimensionality scales with the data volume. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: A visual depiction of the convergence process of the proposed approach.

Mathematical Framework and Algorithm

The paper mathematically formulates the Policy Newton RKHS algorithm, detailing the use of the second-order Fréchet derivative. It shows that the Hessian resides in the space HK⊗HK\mathcal{H}_K \otimes \mathcal{H}_K, further integrated into a conventional quadratic optimization framework with cubic regularization. The Representer Theorem aids in transforming this problem into an optimization over a finite-dimensional Euclidean space.

The algorithm iteratively solves the optimization problem using the conjugate gradient method, which is both computationally efficient and capable of handling the dimensionality of practical datasets.

Convergence and Application

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for the convergence properties of the Policy Newton method in RKHS, demonstrating convergence to a local optimum with a local quadratic convergence rate — a significant advantage over first-order methods. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Results from the CartPole environment demonstrating the effectiveness of the Policy Newton approach in RKHS.

Experimental Validation

Empirical evaluations on both a toy financial asset allocation problem and complex RL benchmarks, such as CartPole and Lunar Lander, validate the theoretical strengths of the approach. These experiments illustrate substantially improved convergence speed and higher reward achievements compared to both traditional first-order and parametric second-order baselines.

Conclusion

This research successfully bridges a critical gap between non-parametric policy representations and second-order optimization methods within the RL context. By providing both theoretical proofs and empirical validation, the paper sets a foundation for the broader applicability of Policy Newton methods to more challenging and high-dimensional RL tasks. Future work could integrate these findings with neural network architectures to further explore their potential in large-scale and high-variance environments.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.