Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Updated measurement of $CP$ violation and polarisation in $B^0_s \rightarrow J/ψ\overline{K}{}^{*}\kern-1pt(892)^{0}$ decays

Published 27 Jun 2025 in hep-ex | (2506.22090v1)

Abstract: A time-integrated angular analysis of the decay $B0_s \rightarrow J/\psi \overline{K}{}{*}\kern-1pt(892){0}$, with $J/\psi \rightarrow \mu{+} \mu{-}$ and $\overline{K}{}{*}\kern-1pt(892){0} \rightarrow K{-} \pi{+}$, is presented. The analysis employs a sample of proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment during 2015-2018 at a centre-of-mass energy of $13 \text{TeV}$, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $6 \text{fb}{-1}$. A simultaneous maximum-likelihood fit is performed to the angular distributions in bins of the $K{-} \pi{+}$ mass. This fit yields measurements of the $CP$-averaged polarisation fractions and $CP$ asymmetries for the P-wave component of the $K{-} \pi{+}$ system. The longitudinal and parallel polarisation fractions are determined to be $f_{0} = 0.534 \pm 0.012 \pm 0.009$ and $f_{\parallel} = 0.211 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.005$, respectively, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The $CP$ asymmetries are measured with $3$-$7\%$ precision and are found to be consistent with zero. These measurements, along with an updated determination of the branching fraction relative to the $B0 \rightarrow J/\psi K{*0}$ decay, are combined with previous LHCb results, providing the most precise values for these observables to date.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.