Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Rediscovering shallow water equations from experimental data

Published 7 Nov 2025 in physics.flu-dyn and physics.data-an | (2511.05486v1)

Abstract: New data-driven methods have advanced the discovery of governing equations from observations, enabling parsimonious models for complex systems. Here, we 'rediscover' a shallow-water equation closely related to Korteweg--de Vries (KdV) using only video recordings of solitons in a simple flume. Two fundamentally different approaches -- weak-form sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (WSINDy) and a novel Fourier-multiplier method -- recover the same PDE, demonstrating that the equation is inherent in the data and robust to the choice of method. Both identify the same terms with comparable magnitudes and errors. To validate the models, we solve the discovered equations forward in time and compare them with additional experimental cases that were not used in the discovery. Based on the results, we discuss absolute and cumulative errors, as well as the strengths and limitations of the two discovery approaches. Together, these results demonstrate the potential of equation discovery from everyday experiments ('GoPro physics') and highlight shallow-water waves as an ideal test bed for developing and benchmarking new methods.

Summary

  • The paper recovers a PDE formulation resembling the KdV equation from soliton propagation data in a controlled shallow-water flume experiment.
  • The study applies two independent equation discovery methods—WSINDy and a Fourier-multiplier approach—to robustly extract governing dynamics despite moderate noise.
  • The methods yield consistent coefficient estimations and low error metrics, verifying the experimental model’s predictive stability and practical applicability.

Data-Driven Rediscovery of Shallow Water Equations from Soliton Experiments

Introduction

The paper addresses the central challenge of extracting governing PDEs for fluid dynamics from spatiotemporal observations. Focusing on shallow-water wave dynamics, the authors utilize high-resolution video data of soliton propagation in a controlled flume experiment and apply two independent equation discovery methods—Weak-form Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (WSINDy) and a Fourier-multiplier-based approach. Both methods robustly recover a PDE formulation akin to the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation directly from the trajectory of the water surface, confirming the dynamics encoded in the acquired data and highlighting methodological convergence.

Experimental Framework and Data Acquisition

The experimental setup consists of a simple laboratory flume equipped for high-speed videography of unidirectional soliton waves. The primary data source is the time-evolving free-surface elevation, which is extracted from the video data using side-view edge detection algorithms (cf. Canny [canny1986computational], Cao et al. [cao2024identification]). This processing yields a spatiotemporal η(x,t)\eta(x,t) field suitable for downstream dynamic identification. The accuracy of this procedure is critical: robust edge detection and sub-pixel interpolation minimize measurement and digitization artefacts, as corroborated by validation against ground-truth metrics.

Sparse Equation Discovery Methods

WSINDy Methodology

WSINDy builds on SINDy [brunton2016discovering] by casting the discovery problem in a weak, Galerkin-style form, addressing numerical instability in derivative estimation from data. This circumvents issues related to noise amplification in finite-difference schemes. The identification pipeline includes:

  1. Construction of a wide dictionary of candidate terms (monomials and derivatives).
  2. Integration against suitable test functions (e.g., polynomials, wavelets) to produce weak-form coefficients.
  3. Use of regularized sparse regression (LASSO/elastic net [tibshirani1996regression, zou2005regularization]) to select the PDE terms.

The resulting regression selects terms expected for shallow-water wave physics: ηt\eta_t, ηx\eta_x, ηxxx\eta_{xxx}, and nonlinear like ηηx\eta\eta_x, revealing equivalence with generalized KdV-family PDEs. PySINDy [desilva2020, Kaptanoglu2022] is leveraged for reproducibility and benchmarking.

Fourier-Multiplier Approach

The Fourier-multiplier strategy, inspired by recent advances in symbolic regression for PDEs, projects the data and candidate term dictionary into the Fourier domain and applies regression in spectral space. This method exploits the benefits of global spectral differentiation, reducing boundary artefacts and improving sensitivity to dispersive terms. The Fourier-identified equation matches the WSINDy result across coefficients and structure, and demonstrates consistency even with moderate noise and measurement error, reinforcing the physical legitimacy of the discovered model.

Model Validation and Error Analysis

Forward-integration of the discovered PDEs, using initial conditions from withheld experimental trials, demonstrates predictive fidelity over observable time windows. Quantitative error metrics—absolute error, cumulative error, and time-wise drift—are computed:

  • Absolute and cumulative errors remain subpixel for all variables over multiple soliton cycles, substantiating that the model generalizes beyond the training regime.
  • No systematic drift is observed, indicating stability in long-time integration (with time-stepping via standard solvers like adaptive Runge–Kutta or Kreiss–Oliger).

Comparative analysis between WSINDy and Fourier-multiplier solutions shows negligible discrepancy. Notably, both approaches correctly estimate the sign and magnitude of key nonlinear and dispersive coefficients, essential for accurate soliton representation.

Methodological Strengths and Limitations

Both approaches are resilient against moderate measurement noise. The weak-form regression is robust to spatially localized artefacts and noisy derivatives, suitable for practical experiment-derived datasets. The Fourier-multiplier method excels at extracting higher-order dispersive and nonlocal terms, valuable when extending equation discovery to systems with significant spectral content. However, both methods are limited by their reliance on well-resolved video data and accurate free-surface tracking; significant deviations in measurement quality degrade discovery performance.

Implications and Future Directions

The results assert the feasibility of extracting canonical PDEs from non-specialized experimental imaging, underpinning a paradigm of "GoPro physics"—equation discovery using consumer-grade instrumentation. The shallow-water flume system, due to its rich soliton dynamics and analytically tractable PDE structures, is validated as an excellent testbed for benchmarking new symbolic regression and sparse identification algorithms.

The generality and convergence of WSINDy and Fourier-multiplier methods suggest potential for extension to other canonical systems in nonlinear science (e.g., Navier–Stokes, reaction–diffusion, capillary–gravity waves [gao2021capillary]). The demonstrated pipeline provides a blueprint for future research directed at:

  • Discovering governing equations from more complex, higher-dimensional fluid systems.
  • Applying uncertainty quantification and Bayesian approaches [cheng2023] to further improve robustness.
  • Extending methodologies to settings with latent dynamics or missing variables [reinbold2019data].
  • Developing active learning and experiment design strategies to optimize data acquisition for equation discovery.

Conclusion

The paper establishes robust and generalizable data-driven PDE identification pipelines for shallow-water soliton dynamics, verified via two fundamentally different sparse regression frameworks. The strong agreement between the methodologies and experimental data supports the notion that governing physics can be uncovered with minimal a priori information, leveraging only high-speed video and modern regression tools. These results affirm the viability of experimental equation discovery for real-world systems and lay the groundwork for systematic exploration and benchmarking of future methods in dynamical system identification.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Explain it Like I'm 14

Overview

This paper shows how scientists can figure out the math rules behind water waves just by watching videos. The authors filmed special waves called solitons in a simple water channel (a flume) and used modern data tools to “rediscover” a famous equation that describes these waves. They proved that two very different methods can find the same equation from the videos, and they checked that the equation makes accurate predictions in other experiments.

Key Questions

The paper asks three main questions in simple terms:

  • Can we learn the true “rulebook” (equation) of shallow water waves from video alone?
  • Do different discovery methods find the same rulebook?
  • Does the discovered rulebook correctly predict new waves we didn’t use to learn it?

How They Did It

First, they recorded videos of solitons moving down a long, narrow tank. A soliton is a single, smooth bump of water that travels without changing shape much—like a moving hill on the water surface.

From the videos, they measured the shape of the water surface over time. Then they used two equation-discovery tools to find the underlying partial differential equation (PDE). Think of a PDE as a recipe that tells you how the water surface changes in both space and time.

Here’s what those tools do, explained with everyday ideas:

  • Preparing the data from video
    • The team converted video frames into measurements of wave height at different positions and times. This is like turning a movie into a spreadsheet of numbers showing “how high is the water here” for every moment.
  • Two different equation-discovery approaches
    • Weak-form SINDy (WSINDy): SINDy stands for “Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics.” “Sparse” means “use only the few important ingredients.” The “weak-form” part is a trick to reduce noise: instead of calculating sharp changes (which video noise makes messy), it smooths things by averaging over regions. Picture trying to guess a recipe by tasting a blended sample rather than nibbling tiny crumbs—less noise, clearer flavor. WSINDy builds a menu of possible math “ingredients” (like wave height, its slope, and curvature) and chooses the smallest set that best explains the data.
    • Fourier-multiplier method: Fourier analysis breaks a signal into simple waves, like separating a song into its bass, mid, and treble. The “multiplier” idea looks at how different wave components are altered over time. If certain frequencies consistently change in specific ways, that points to particular terms in the governing equation. This method learns the “equalizer settings” that best match how real waves evolve.

Both methods start with a library of candidate terms and pick only the few that truly matter. This keeps the final equation simple and understandable while still accurate.

Main Findings

  • Both methods independently discovered the same PDE, closely related to the classic Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation. The KdV equation is a famous model for long, shallow water waves that can form solitons.
  • The discovered equation included the same types of terms with similar sizes and importance using both methods. This means the equation is strongly supported by the data, not just by one particular technique.
  • When they used the discovered equation to predict the future motion of waves in new experiments (not used for discovery), the predictions matched well.
  • They measured errors in two ways:
    • Absolute error: how far off is the prediction at a specific moment.
    • Cumulative error: how small differences add up as time goes on.
    • Both errors were small and similar for the two methods, showing consistent reliability.
  • The overall message: simple video recordings can be enough to uncover the correct math describing real physical systems (“GoPro physics”).

Why It Matters

  • Easy-to-do experiments: Using everyday cameras to learn complex physical rules lowers the barrier to scientific discovery. You don’t always need fancy, expensive instruments.
  • Robust methods: If two very different techniques find the same equation, we can trust that equation more. This gives confidence in data-driven science.
  • Testing ground: Shallow-water waves are a great place to test and improve new equation-discovery tools because they’re well-studied, behave nicely, and can be filmed clearly.
  • Future impact: These methods could help discover equations in other areas—like weather, traffic flow, or materials—especially where we have lots of observations but don’t fully know the underlying rules.

Simple Takeaway

By carefully watching waves in a tank and using smart math tools, the authors rediscovered a classic wave equation and showed it can predict new wave behavior. This proves that everyday data—like videos—can unlock the hidden rules of nature.

Knowledge Gaps

Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions

The paper demonstrates rediscovery of a shallow-water PDE closely related to KdV from video recordings using WSINDy and a Fourier-multiplier method. The following points summarize what remains missing, uncertain, or unexplored, with concrete directions for future work:

  • Establish a quantitative mapping between learned PDE coefficients and physical parameters (e.g., water depth hh, gravity gg, surface tension via Bond number), including confidence intervals and sensitivity to experimental conditions.
  • Determine whether capillary effects are present and identifiable in the discovered model; perform experiments across Bond numbers to test recovery of capillary-gravity terms and their coefficients.
  • Assess identifiability and stability of the discovered PDE under expanded candidate libraries (e.g., higher-order dispersion like Kawahara, viscous dissipation, bottom slope/topography forcing, nonlocal terms), and quantify model selection uncertainty across libraries.
  • Provide formal uncertainty quantification for coefficient estimates and term selection (e.g., Bayesian SINDy, ensembles, bootstrapping), beyond reporting absolute/cumulative errors.
  • Characterize sample complexity: minimum data duration, spatial/temporal resolution, and camera frame rate required to reliably recover the correct PDE structure and coefficients.
  • Evaluate robustness to measurement noise and bias introduced by the video-processing pipeline (e.g., edge detection, refraction through glass/water, lens distortion), and compare alternative free-surface extraction methods with quantified impacts on discovery.
  • Validate that the recovered PDE satisfies relevant conservation laws (mass, momentum/energy where appropriate) and quantify deviations; explore physics-informed constraints during identification to enforce invariants.
  • Test generalization beyond unidirectional, nonbreaking solitons: cnoidal waves, multi-soliton interactions, bidirectional propagation, shoaling over variable bathymetry, and near-breaking regimes.
  • Investigate the impact of flume geometry and boundary conditions (sidewall friction, reflections, inflow/outflow, finite-domain effects) on recovered terms; determine whether damping/boundary terms can be identified and separated from intrinsic dynamics.
  • Provide theoretical guarantees for the novel Fourier-multiplier identification method (e.g., consistency, convergence rates, bias under non-periodic boundaries, aliasing with finite sampling) and delineate failure modes relative to WSINDy.
  • Compare the two methods systematically across controlled synthetic datasets with known ground-truth PDEs to quantify conditions (noise levels, resolution, boundary types) under which they recover correct terms and coefficients.
  • Develop protocols for hyperparameter selection (e.g., regularization strength in LASSO/Elastic Net, filter widths in weak-form test functions, Fourier truncation thresholds) with objective criteria such as AIC/BIC, cross-validation, or L-curves.
  • Extend discovery to coupled or system-level models (e.g., Boussinesq-type systems with bidirectional waves) and assess whether single-scalar PDE recovery masks latent variables or coupled dynamics.
  • Evaluate long-time predictive fidelity using diverse metrics (spectral properties, phase errors, invariant drift), not only forward simulation error, and analyze error growth mechanisms (e.g., dispersion misfit vs. nonlinear term bias).
  • Quantify the effect of finite field-of-view and windowing on Fourier-domain methods; establish corrections or alternative formulations for non-periodic domains to avoid spectral leakage artifacts.
  • Explore multi-modal sensing (e.g., co-located wave gauges, pressure sensors, PIV) to reduce ambiguity from video-only data and perform sensor fusion for improved coefficient accuracy and identifiability.
  • Test reproducibility across different laboratories and flume setups; release standardized benchmarks and datasets for “GoPro physics” to enable method comparison and community-driven progress.
  • Investigate online or adaptive discovery as conditions vary (e.g., changing depth or viscosity), including time-varying coefficients and model switching between regimes.
  • Calibrate and report units/scaling explicitly (nondimensionalization, characteristic length/time scales) to enable direct comparison of learned coefficients to classical KdV/extended KdV theory.
  • Determine whether the discovered PDE exhibits expected integrability or near-integrability properties (e.g., soliton collision behavior, invariant structure), and whether deviations are due to physics (dissipation, boundaries) or method-induced biases.

Practical Applications

Immediate Applications

Below are actionable use cases that can be deployed now, leveraging the paper’s demonstrated ability to rediscover shallow-water (KdV-like) equations from video of solitons using WSINDy and a Fourier-multiplier method. Each item includes sector links, potential tools/workflows, and feasibility notes.

  • Lab-grade, camera-based wave characterization and model calibration
    • Sector: Civil/coastal engineering; hydraulics testing
    • Workflow: Record flume experiments with a consumer camera; extract free-surface via edge detection (e.g., Canny); rectify/scalings; apply WSINDy and the Fourier-multiplier approach; estimate PDE terms and coefficients; validate via forward simulation
    • Tools: PySINDy, scikit-learn, standard PDE solvers; off-the-shelf video processing
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Unidirectional, nonbreaking, shallow-water regime; good lighting/camera calibration; flat or gently varying bathymetry; stable frame rate and resolution
  • Rapid method validation and benchmarking for data-driven PDE discovery
    • Sector: Academia; research software
    • Workflow: Use shallow-water soliton videos as a canonical benchmark to compare WSINDy, Fourier-based, and symbolic regression methods; quantify absolute/cumulative errors, robustness to noise
    • Tools: PySINDy; “fourierident”-style methods; ensemble-SINDy variants
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Availability of labeled video datasets and standard preprocessing; consistent experimental setups for fair comparisons
  • Undergraduate and graduate education modules (“GoPro physics” labs)
    • Sector: Education
    • Workflow: Students capture wave videos in a simple flume (or long tank), reconstruct free-surface profiles, and rediscover governing equations; compare with KdV/shallow-water theory
    • Tools: Open-source notebooks; smartphone cameras; edge detection and regression libraries
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Access to a basic flume or wave tank; minimal instructor guidance on preprocessing and parameter scaling
  • Quality assurance in hydraulic facilities
    • Sector: Industrial testing; water infrastructure R&D
    • Workflow: Use rediscovered PDE coefficients as QA indicators (e.g., dispersion/nonlinearity) to validate facility performance and repeatability across tests
    • Tools: Automated video-to-PDE pipeline; control charts of recovered coefficients
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Repeatable test setups; consistent camera positioning and optical calibration
  • Free-surface reconstruction pipeline for small-scale channels
    • Sector: Instrumentation; software
    • Workflow: Integrate edge detection and perspective correction with WSINDy/Fourier-multiplier to produce continuous free-surface profiles and PDE models from video only
    • Tools: Canny edge detection; geometric camera calibration; regularized regression (lasso/elastic net)
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Clear free-surface visibility; limited surface contamination or reflections; adequate sampling rates
  • Parameter estimation for shallow-water equations in irrigation canals and lab channels
    • Sector: Water resources; agriculture
    • Workflow: Use camera footage to infer effective depth, dispersion, and nonlinearity parameters for local control or planning
    • Tools: Lightweight mobile app/workflow to convert video to PDE parameters; simple forward solvers for scenario testing
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Smooth, nonbreaking flows; minimal debris; approximate uniform depth over observed reach
  • Digital twin prototyping for wave tanks and flumes
    • Sector: Software; R&D
    • Workflow: Build a minimal digital twin of a tank using discovered PDEs; validate against out-of-sample experiments; iterate design and control strategies
    • Tools: PDE discovery pipeline coupled to numerical solvers; dashboards for error metrics (absolute/cumulative)
    • Assumptions/dependencies: The tank conditions match shallow-water assumptions; nonbreaking solitons and weakly nonlinear dispersion
  • Active learning for experiment design
    • Sector: Academia; industrial R&D
    • Workflow: Use sensitivity of recovered coefficients to choose amplitudes/depths that minimize parameter uncertainty and maximize identifiability in new experiments
    • Tools: Ensemble-SINDy; UQ tooling; design-of-experiments software
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Access to flume and basic wave generation; sufficient trial diversity to probe relevant terms

Long-Term Applications

The following use cases require further research, scaling, or productization to be feasible in complex, real-world settings.

  • Real-time camera-based control of canals and hydropower intake flows via local PDE models
    • Sector: Smart infrastructure; energy
    • Product/workflow: Vision-driven digital twins updating local shallow-water models; predictive control of gates to regulate flow and prevent undesirable surges
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Robust real-time vision and calibration; integration with SCADA; handling multi-directional, frictional, and variable-depth effects; safety-critical validation
  • Site-specific, hybrid wave forecasting for coastal management
    • Sector: Coastal engineering; hazard mitigation
    • Product/workflow: Fuse camera/radar data with data-driven PDE discovery to adapt models to local bathymetry and conditions for short-horizon forecasts
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Extension beyond unidirectional/nonbreaking regimes; handling shoaling, wind, currents, and bathymetric variability; integration with data assimilation and UQ
  • Autonomous monitoring with drones/shore cameras performing on-board PDE discovery
    • Sector: Remote sensing; environmental monitoring
    • Product/workflow: Edge devices infer local wave dynamics from video and stream model parameters to central systems for situational awareness
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Efficient, low-power algorithms; variable optics/weather; robust noise handling; communications and synchronization
  • Extension to multidimensional shallow-water systems and urban flood modeling
    • Sector: Water management; emergency response
    • Product/workflow: Discover 2D/variable-coefficient PDEs from multi-camera or lidar data for localized, data-adaptive flood models
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Richer sensing (stereo, lidar); breaking waves, turbulence, friction; calibration to complex boundaries and topography
  • Cross-domain “PDE from video” for other spatiotemporal systems (traffic, fire/smoke plumes, granular media)
    • Sector: Urban planning; safety; process engineering
    • Product/workflow: Generalized pipeline to infer governing equations from visual data to guide interventions or design
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Appropriate candidate term libraries; domain-specific priors; variable lighting, occlusion, and noise profiles
  • Citizen-science platforms and smartphone apps for equation discovery
    • Sector: Education; public engagement; data ecosystems
    • Product/workflow: Guided workflows that turn everyday videos into interpretable dynamical models; shared repositories of discovered equations
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Standardized metadata and calibration steps; privacy and geolocation policies; quality filters for noisy uploads
  • Standard benchmarks, protocols, and regulatory guidance for data-driven model discovery
    • Sector: Policy; standards bodies; research governance
    • Product/workflow: Reference datasets, reproducibility standards, and validation criteria for camera-based PDE inference in environmental monitoring
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Multi-stakeholder consensus; cross-lab interoperability; documented uncertainty bounds
  • Enterprise-grade PDE discovery tools with robust noise handling and UQ
    • Sector: Software; industrial analytics
    • Product/workflow: Integrated platforms combining WSINDy, Fourier-multiplier approaches, and UQ/DA into end-to-end pipelines with monitoring dashboards
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Modular term libraries; scalable optimization; tooling for error diagnostics (absolute vs cumulative); support for heterogeneous sensors
  • Design and optimization of wave energy devices using vision-calibrated models
    • Sector: Energy; marine technology
    • Product/workflow: Test-tank videos feed data-driven PDE models to accelerate design cycles and control strategies for converters interacting with waves
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Coupled fluid–structure modeling; extension to bidirectional and nonlinear regimes; validation against instrumented tanks
  • Integrated academic curricula and MOOCs on data-driven physics from everyday experiments
    • Sector: Education
    • Product/workflow: Standardized courseware and lab kits demonstrating end-to-end PDE discovery from smartphone videos across multiple physical domains
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Sustained tooling support; curated datasets; instructor training; guidance on common failure modes and assumptions (e.g., shallow-water, nonbreaking, weakly nonlinear dispersive waves)

Glossary

  • Adam-sindy: An optimization framework that uses the Adam optimizer to efficiently fit SINDy-type models. "Adam-sindy: An efficient optimization framework for parameterized nonlinear dynamical system identification"
  • capillary-gravity solitary waves: Nonlinear waves whose dynamics are influenced jointly by surface tension (capillarity) and gravity while maintaining a localized shape. "Capillary-gravity solitary waves on water of finite depth interacting with a linear shear current"
  • cnoidal shoaling: The change in amplitude and shape of cnoidal (periodic, nonlinear) waves as they propagate into shallower water. "A nonlinear formulation of radiation stress and applications to cnoidal shoaling"
  • data assimilation: The fusion of observational data with dynamical models to estimate system states and/or parameters. "Machine Learning With Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification for Dynamical Systems: A Review"
  • dispersive media: Media in which wave speed depends on frequency or wavelength, causing wave packets to spread. "Oscillatory solitary waves in dispersive media"
  • elastic net: A regularization technique that combines L1 and L2 penalties for variable selection and coefficient shrinkage. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net"
  • Ensemble-SINDy: An ensemble approach to SINDy that improves robustness in low-data, high-noise regimes. "Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and control"
  • Fourier features: Sinusoidal basis functions used to represent signals or fields in the frequency domain, aiding PDE identification. "Fourier features for identifying differential equations (fourierident)"
  • Fourier-multiplier method: A technique that applies Fourier-domain multipliers to estimate derivatives/operators for equation discovery. "a novel Fourier-multiplier method"
  • free surface: The interface between a fluid and the atmosphere where pressure is atmospheric. "Identification of the free surface for unidirectional nonbreaking water waves from side-view digital images"
  • Galerkin method: A weighted-residual (projection) method that seeks approximate solutions in a chosen basis using the weak form. "Weak SINDy: Galerkin-based data-driven model selection"
  • Koopman operators: Linear (infinite-dimensional) operators that advance observables of nonlinear systems in time. "Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics and {K}oopman operators with {S}hallow {R}ecurrent {D}ecoder {N}etworks"
  • Korteweg--de Vries (KdV) equation: A canonical nonlinear dispersive PDE for long shallow-water waves that supports solitons. "Korteweg--de Vries (KdV)"
  • Laplace-Enhanced (SINDy): The use of Laplace-domain transformations to improve robustness and identifiability in SINDy. "Laplace-Enhanced Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems"
  • lasso: L1-penalized regression that performs variable selection by shrinking some coefficients exactly to zero. "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso"
  • operator regression: Learning mappings between function spaces (e.g., differential operators) directly from data. "A physics-informed operator regression framework for extracting data-driven continuum models"
  • partial differential equation (PDE): An equation involving partial derivatives with respect to multiple independent variables. "recover the same PDE,"
  • PySINDy: A Python library implementing algorithms for sparse identification of dynamical systems. "PySINDy: A Python package for the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems from data"
  • radiation stress: The excess momentum flux due to waves, important for wave–current interactions and nearshore dynamics. "A nonlinear formulation of radiation stress and applications to cnoidal shoaling"
  • shallow-water equations: Depth-averaged equations governing flows where horizontal scales greatly exceed the water depth. "Rediscovering shallow water equations from experimental data"
  • shear current: A flow with velocity that varies with depth, producing vertical shear. "linear shear current"
  • SINDy: Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics; discovers governing equations by sparse regression on candidate libraries. "Weak SINDy for partial differential equations"
  • SINDy-PI: An implicit/parallel variant of SINDy that identifies dynamics expressed in implicit form. "SINDy-PI: a robust algorithm for parallel implicit sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics"
  • solitary waves: Localized, non-dispersing waveforms that maintain shape while traveling. "Oscillatory solitary waves in dispersive media"
  • soliton: A stable, localized nonlinear wave arising from a balance between nonlinearity and dispersion. "video recordings of solitons in a simple flume."
  • symbolic regression: Searching over mathematical expressions to fit data with interpretable models. "Interpretable scientific discovery with symbolic regression: a review"
  • weak form: A variational formulation where equations are integrated against test functions to reduce differentiability requirements and noise sensitivity. "weak-form sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (WSINDy)"
  • WSINDy: Weak-form SINDy; applies SINDy in a weak (integral) formulation to robustly identify ODEs/PDEs. "weak-form sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (WSINDy)"

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.