Path-integral approach to Casimir effect with infinitely thin plates
Abstract: When studying the Casimir effect in a quantum field theory setting, one can impose the boundary conditions by adding appropriate Dirac-delta functions to the path integral. In this paper, the limits of this approach are explored under different boundary conditions.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
What this paper is about (in simple terms)
This paper looks at a tiny force from quantum physics called the Casimir effect. Imagine empty space isn’t really empty—it’s filled with “wiggles” (waves) that pop in and out all the time. If you put two very flat plates close together, some waves fit between them and others don’t, and that creates a small force pushing the plates together.
The paper tests a popular math method for calculating this force when the plates are treated as infinitely thin and when the surfaces enforce different “edge rules” (boundary conditions) on the waves. It finds the method works well for one type of edge rule (like a perfect electric conductor) but fails or gives misleading results for another type (like a perfect magnetic conductor), unless you change the setup to be more realistic (for example, give the plates some thickness).
What questions does the paper ask?
- Can we safely use a standard path-integral trick (adding delta functions) to impose boundary conditions on infinitely thin plates and still get the correct Casimir force?
- Does this work equally well for two kinds of boundary conditions:
- Dirichlet (like fixing the value of the wave at the surface; similar to a string pinned at both ends—perfect electric conductor)
- Neumann (like fixing the slope of the wave at the surface; similar to a string whose ends slide freely—perfect magnetic conductor)
- If the standard trick breaks down, can we fix it in a physically sensible way, and what does that tell us about the real force?
How the paper studies the problem (methods explained simply)
The author compares two ways of doing the same physics:
- Mode counting (the “classic” way)
- Think of the space between plates like a musical instrument. Only certain notes (wave patterns) fit. Count those notes, add up their energies properly, and you get the force.
- Path integrals with boundary conditions (the BRW approach)
- Instead of counting notes, imagine averaging over all possible wave shapes, but enforce the surface rules by adding “delta function locks” in the math. This is a compact, powerful method used in quantum field theory.
To keep the math simple, the author studies a massless scalar wave (a simpler stand-in for light). In empty space, electric and magnetic effects are related, and for this simplified model:
- Dirichlet boundary conditions act like perfect electric conductor plates.
- Neumann boundary conditions act like perfect magnetic conductor plates.
The paper then probes where the BRW method breaks:
- For Dirichlet: calculations behave nicely and match the classic result.
- For Neumann: integrals blow up (become infinite) in a crucial direction (perpendicular to the plates). Some past papers tried to “make the infinity go away” with shortcuts, but the author shows those shortcuts are not trustworthy here.
To fix this properly, the author tries three more physical regulators (ways to control infinities):
- A simple high-momentum cutoff: ignore waves with extremely high energy. Result: for Neumann, the part of the energy that depends on the plate distance fades away as the cutoff is removed—the force goes to zero.
- Give the plates a small thickness and allow “Robin” boundary conditions (an adjustable mix that includes both Dirichlet and Neumann). Result: thickness cures the bad integrals. In the pure Dirichlet limit, you get the standard force. In the pure Neumann limit, as thickness shrinks to zero, the force shrinks to zero too.
- A different, well-known approach (Graham et al.): instead of delta-function locks, add a “background wall” term to the action that punishes waves inside the plate region. With the right setup, this reproduces Dirichlet when the wall is very strong. For Neumann, in the thin-plate limit, the plates become almost “invisible” to the waves, so the force again goes to zero. With very thick plates, you recover the familiar results.
Along the way, the paper also notes that for real electromagnetic fields, the BRW method does not perfectly respect electric–magnetic duality, and a particular polarization makes the Neumann-type problem even worse.
What the paper finds (main results)
- For Dirichlet (electric-type) boundary conditions
- The BRW method with infinitely thin plates works and matches the classic Casimir force. Good news: the usual calculations are reliable here.
- For Neumann (magnetic-type) boundary conditions
- The BRW method develops a serious infinity in a key integral. Past attempts to remove it used shortcuts that the author argues are not valid.
- When you regulate the problem in physically sensible ways (cutoffs, plate thickness, or the Graham-style “background wall”), the Neumann force between infinitely thin plates tends to zero. In other words, ultra-thin Neumann plates don’t produce the usual Casimir attraction in these consistent setups.
- If you make the plates thick, the standard behavior is recovered, and you can smoothly connect to familiar results.
- For mixed/Robin conditions (a blend between Dirichlet and Neumann)
- Thickness matters, and different limits (making plates thinner vs. turning the blend parameter up or down) don’t always commute. This warns that details of how you idealize the plates can change the answer.
- Physical picture
- Dirichlet-like plates act like opaque walls: waves can’t get through when the wall is strong, so the classic force appears even for thin plates.
- Neumann-like plates act very differently: even a very strong but very thin “Neumann wall” lets waves pass through in a way that kills the force unless the plates are thick.
Why this is important (implications)
- Be careful using the BRW delta-function trick for Neumann or Robin boundary conditions on infinitely thin plates. If you remove infinities with questionable steps, you may get the “right-looking” answer for the wrong reasons.
- Physically meaningful regulators suggest that for Neumann-like (magnetic) conditions, truly thin plates don’t produce the standard Casimir force; thickness or additional “bulk” conditions inside the material matter.
- For real electromagnetism (and even models of the strong force, like the MIT bag model), this means:
- Idealizing plates as infinitely thin and purely boundary-only can miss important physics unless you’re in the Dirichlet/electric case.
- Electric–magnetic duality can be broken by realistic features like plate thickness and material properties.
- Future work should include plate thickness or bulk behavior explicitly when dealing with magnetic or mixed (Robin) boundary conditions. Results based on dropping infinities without a physical regulator should be treated with caution.
A short takeaway
- The usual path-integral method works well for “fixed value” (Dirichlet/electric) boundaries on thin plates and reproduces the known Casimir force.
- For “fixed slope” (Neumann/magnetic) boundaries, the same method runs into real mathematical and physical trouble unless the plates have thickness. When treated properly, the Casimir force for ultra-thin Neumann plates fades away, which means earlier “infinite-plate-thin, Neumann” calculations that got the standard force probably relied on unsafe shortcuts.
Knowledge Gaps
Unresolved gaps, limitations, and open questions
Below is a concise list of specific gaps and open problems that remain unresolved and could guide future research:
- Rigorous foundation for Neumann/Robin boundary conditions in the BRW approach: develop a mathematically consistent path-integral prescription for imposing derivative boundary constraints that avoids the divergent integrals without ad hoc manipulations (e.g., dropping or taking inside discontinuous expressions).
- Regulator design that preserves physical symmetries: construct and analyze regulators for the BRW boundary path-integral that (i) control the divergences, (ii) preserve gauge invariance, and (iii) respect electric–magnetic duality where appropriate; demonstrate regulator-independence of physical observables for Neumann and general Robin conditions.
- Scalar-to-gauge mapping beyond tree-level: extend the scalar analysis to full QED/Yang–Mills, including all physical polarizations, gauge fixing, ghosts, and loop corrections; provide a complete renormalization scheme for boundary-induced operators in gauge theories with Neumann/Robin constraints.
- Third polarization in the magnetic conductor case: quantify the contribution, divergence structure, and proper regularization of the “third polarization” identified under magnetic conductor boundary conditions in the BRW framework; determine its impact on Casimir energy and how to consistently include or decouple it.
- Clarify why prior BRW-based works recover standard results: perform a detailed re-analysis of the computations in [Dudal et al.; Canfora et al.] to identify the precise assumptions/regularizations that lead to agreement with mode-sum results, and determine whether those steps are mathematically justified or accidentally cancel problematic terms.
- Non-commuting limits and order-of-limits issues: systematically study the non-commuting limits and (and ) in both BRW and background-field approaches, identify the physically correct order of limits, and propose a renormalization prescription that yields the expected Casimir forces across boundary types.
- Resolution of the Robin sign ambiguity for thick plates in BRW: the current implementation exhibits confusion about the sign of the Robin parameter and fails to recover known RR results unless the sign is flipped on one plate; derive a consistent sign convention tied to the plate normals and show agreement with scattering/mode approaches for general Robin conditions.
- Incorporating bulk constraints of real conductors: develop a boundary effective field theory that simultaneously imposes boundary conditions (e.g., ) and bulk constraints ( inside the plate) to model realistic (electro)magnetic conductors, and test whether such bulk terms cure the Neumann/Robin inconsistencies for thin plates.
- Duality at finite thickness: characterize precisely when electric–magnetic duality survives or is broken in finite-thickness models; identify boundary/bulk actions that maintain duality in the limit relevant to Casimir calculations and quantify deviations when waves penetrate the plates.
- Unified comparison of approaches: provide a systematic equivalence (or inequivalence) analysis among (i) BRW with delta constraints, (ii) thick-plate BRW with -fields, (iii) background-field methods à la Graham et al., and (iv) mode-matching/scattering theory; delineate the conditions under which these formalisms produce the same Casimir energy.
- Proper distributional treatment of integrals with near : replace informal manipulations with a rigorous distributional/analytic-regularization framework that handles the discontinuity and contributions, and determine the correct limiting procedures for boundary-induced integrals.
- Boundary renormalization program for Neumann/Robin: enumerate and compute all local counterterms (e.g., powers of ) generated by derivative boundary couplings, prove locality in , and verify that physically relevant (nonlocal in ) contributions coincide with mode-sum predictions after renormalization.
- PEMC (duality angle) implementation: construct a consistent path-integral implementation of perfect electromagnetic conductor boundary conditions with a duality angle, demonstrate its regulator-independence, and recover known interpolations between electric and magnetic limits without invoking problematic limits.
- Role of dynamical edge modes: assess whether including dynamical boundary degrees of freedom (e.g., via BRST/edge-mode constructions) resolves the divergences or recovers correct Neumann/Robin Casimir energies; quantify their contribution to the vacuum energy.
- Scattering-theory verification for finite thickness: perform independent scattering/mode calculations with finite-thickness Neumann/Robin plates (including frequency-dependent and material parameters) to numerically validate the predicted small- behavior (e.g., ) and the approach to standard Dirichlet results as .
- Extension beyond massless scalars: investigate whether adding a small mass, dispersion, or realistic material response alters the divergence structure or restores nonzero Casimir forces for thin Neumann plates; identify parameter regimes where BRW and background-field methods agree.
- Mathematical well-posedness of derivative constraints in functional integrals: provide a rigorous construction of the measure and constraint implementation for on measure-zero sets (infinitely thin plates), possibly via auxiliary-field or boundary-action formulations that avoid singular kernels.
- Experimental relevance and material modeling: connect the theoretical findings to experimentally realizable systems with finite conductivity/permeability and thickness; specify measurable signatures of the predicted vanishing Casimir force in thin Neumann-like setups and the crossover with increasing thickness.
Practical Applications
Below is a structured summary of practical applications that follow from the paper’s findings on the path-integral (BRW) approach to Casimir physics with infinitely thin plates, its identified limitations for Neumann/PMC boundary conditions, and the proposed regularization and thick-plate remedies.
Immediate Applications
- Robust simulation workflows for Casimir forces in layered and thin-film structures
- Sector: software, semiconductors (MEMS/NEMS), photonics, academia
- Use case: Update computational models that use boundary-functional (BRW-like) methods to (a) avoid invalid regularizations for Neumann/PMC/Robin boundary conditions, (b) include finite plate thickness explicitly, and (c) cross-check with mode-sum or Gel’fand–Yaglom methods for 1D determinants.
- Tools/products: A lightweight library that implements the Gel’fand–Yaglom approach for stratified media; reference routines for Robin BC with thickness; validation test suite comparing BRW (Dirichlet) vs thick-plate (Robin/Neumann).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Free-field approximations; perfect boundary models; accurate thickness control; dispersion/temperature/roughness not yet included.
- Design guidance for minimizing stiction in MEMS/NEMS due to Casimir forces
- Sector: semiconductors, robotics (micro-actuators), healthcare (lab-on-chip)
- Use case: Engineers can tune coatings and layer thicknesses knowing that Neumann/PMC-type “infinitely thin” boundary layers do not produce the expected Casimir pressure; finite thickness or bulk conditions are required to achieve a nonzero effect.
- Tools/workflows: Materials stack selection rules; thickness thresholds; checklists in design reviews to avoid “PMC via zero-thickness” mis-modeling.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Real materials are not perfect conductors; bulk conditions (e.g., field suppression inside the plate) may be needed; process variability in nanofabrication.
- Experimental protocol updates for Casimir measurements with magnetic-type boundaries
- Sector: academia, metrology
- Use case: Recalibrate measurement campaigns and data interpretation for PMC/metamaterial boundaries: ensure samples have controlled finite thickness and avoid conclusions drawn from models that assume infinitely thin, magnetic-type boundaries in BRW.
- Tools/workflows: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sample preparation (thickness control), uncertainty budgets including “thickness-induced duality breaking.”
- Assumptions/dependencies: Precision thickness characterization; reliable metamaterial PMC realizations; high-vacuum test environments.
- Re-evaluation of published BRW-based results using Neumann/PMC/Robin BC
- Sector: academia
- Use case: Conduct reproducibility checks and issue errata/updates for works that relied on the “add exponential and take L→0” or “δ(0)=0 in dimensional regularization” steps for the pz integral; prioritize studies with thick plates or background-field methods for Neumann/PMC.
- Tools/workflows: Audit framework; benchmark datasets; curated list of test geometries (parallel plates, wires).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Community consensus on best-practice regularization; availability of source code and data.
- Curriculum and training modules on boundary QFT pitfalls and remedies
- Sector: education, academia
- Use case: Short courses/lecture notes stressing that BRW works cleanly for Dirichlet/PEC-like boundaries but requires thickness and careful regularization for Neumann/PMC/Robin; include Gel’fand–Yaglom and thick-plate sigma-field techniques.
- Tools/products: Annotated problem sets; comparative derivations; coding assignments for determinant evaluation.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Target audience familiar with QFT, functional determinants, and Casimir energetics.
- Best-practice guidance for simulation standards in nanoengineering
- Sector: policy/standards (industry consortia, research labs)
- Use case: Establish guidelines that explicitly disallow “thin-plate Neumann via BRW with ad hoc pz-regularization”; recommend finite-thickness modeling or validated background-action methods.
- Tools/products: Draft technical standard; checklist for peer review and procurement.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Stakeholder alignment; compatibility with common CAE platforms (COMSOL, Ansys).
Long-Term Applications
- Integrated, validated Casimir simulation platform for realistic materials and full electromagnetism
- Sector: software, engineering
- Use case: A unified solver that treats finite conductivity, dispersion, temperature, roughness, and finite thickness; includes electromagnetic duality breaking in finite-thickness plates and recovers PEC results exactly.
- Tools/products: Commercial/academic codebase with plugins; verification against known analytic limits (Dirichlet) and thick-plate Neumann/Robin results.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Material databases; HPC resources; verified experimental datasets.
- Tunable Casimir devices via engineered Robin-like boundary conditions
- Sector: photonics, robotics (micro-actuators)
- Use case: Develop microcavities/metasurfaces whose effective boundary parameter “c” (duality angle in gauge analogs) can be modulated to control attractive/repulsive forces, enabling switchable adhesion or actuation.
- Tools/products: Metamaterial stacks with controllable impedance; actuator design kits; on-chip force regulators.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Physical realization of Robin BC (impedance control, thickness); fabrication tolerances; integration with standard CMOS flows.
- Improved modeling of the QCD vacuum and MIT bag boundaries
- Sector: academia (high-energy physics)
- Use case: Revisit bag-model and dual-superconductor pictures with boundary actions that include finite-thickness corrections; avoid relying on duality for thin magnetic boundaries in functional formulations.
- Tools/workflows: Boundary-field QCD simulations; effective models including polarization content and divergent modes identified in the paper.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Extension from scalars to non-Abelian gauge fields beyond tree level; renormalization with interactions.
- Material development for practical PMC/EMC boundaries with bulk conditions
- Sector: materials, telecom/antennas
- Use case: Fabricate thick PMC/EMC metamaterials that enforce bulk field suppression (not just surface BCs), achieving predictable Casimir behavior and reliable duality properties in devices.
- Tools/products: Design and characterization pipelines for artificial magnetic conductors; thick-film processes; RF-compatible coatings.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Stability of bulk properties across frequency; scalability and cost; environmental robustness.
- Standardized divergence-handling framework for functional approaches in physics
- Sector: academia, software
- Use case: A cross-domain methodology catalog for handling pz-integral divergences and δ-function ambiguities in boundary-functional methods, with proofs of continuity, regulator dependence, and physical consistency checks.
- Tools/products: Open-source “regularization cookbook” with test problems; certification tests for new methods.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Community adoption; coverage across scalar, EM, and non-Abelian cases.
- Broader adoption of Gel’fand–Yaglom-based determinant evaluation in stratified systems
- Sector: condensed matter, quantum thermodynamics, photonics
- Use case: Apply 1D determinant techniques to compute vacuum energies, spectral shifts, and thermodynamic quantities in multilayered media, beyond Casimir plate geometries (e.g., quantum wells, optical stacks).
- Tools/products: Libraries and tutorials; integration with transfer-matrix solvers.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Extension to interacting theories; numerical stability for complex stacks.
Notes on assumptions and dependencies common across applications:
- The paper’s core results are derived for free, massless scalars, with mapping to gauge fields at tree level; full Maxwell/Yang–Mills with interactions, dispersion, and temperature require further development.
- Perfect conductors are idealizations; real materials break duality at finite thickness and require bulk conditions to suppress fields inside the plates.
- The “infinitely thin plate” paradigm is safe for Dirichlet/PEC via BRW but not for Neumann/PMC/Robin, where thickness or alternative formulations are essential.
- Regulatory/standards implications hinge on community consensus and reproducibility of updated methods and measurements.
Glossary
- Asymptotic freedom: Property of certain gauge theories where interactions become weaker at high energies. "the bag is modeled as a small region of space wherein asymptotic freedom reigns"
- BRW approach: The Bordag–Robaschik–Wieczorek path-integral method that imposes boundary conditions via delta functions on the plates. "For ease of reference, I will call this the BRW approach."
- Casimir effect: Quantum phenomenon where vacuum fluctuations induce forces between conducting boundaries. "There has been recent interest in the description of the Casimir effect in terms of a quantum field theory on the boundary plates"
- Casimir pressure: The pressure resulting from the Casimir effect, obtained from the derivative of vacuum energy with respect to plate separation. "For the Casimir pressure P_{\text{Cas}L$:"</li> <li><strong>Cut-off regularization</strong>: A method to tame divergences by imposing a high-momentum (UV) cutoff on integrals. "Cut-off regularization seems to be the simplest option for the problem at hand."</li> <li><strong>Dirac-δ function</strong>: Distribution that enforces constraints (e.g., boundary conditions) in the path integral. "The boundary conditions are imposed by introducing Dirac-$\delta$ functions into the path integral."</li> <li><strong>Dirichlet boundary conditions</strong>: Boundary conditions fixing the field to vanish on the surface. "This means we have Dirichlet boundary conditions for the electric field."</li> <li><strong>Dimensional regularization</strong>: Technique to regulate divergent integrals by analytically continuing the number of dimensions. "It is generally accepted that dimensional regularization gives the correct result."</li> <li><strong>Dual superconductor picture</strong>: Model of the QCD vacuum where color confinement is analogous to superconductivity via dual variables. "One of the stated goals of this program is the dual superconductor picture of the QCD vacuum"</li> <li><strong>Duality</strong>: Equivalence between electric and magnetic descriptions in vacuum field theories. "In vacuum, electric and magnetic effects are interchangeable due to duality, and so the Casimir effect is not impacted by this modification."</li> <li><strong>Faraday’s law</strong>: Maxwell equation relating changing magnetic fields to induced electric fields (curl E). "This implies, through Faraday's law, that $(\vec\nabla\times\vec E)_x = 0$"</li> <li><strong>Fourier transform</strong>: Representation of fields and actions in momentum space to simplify integrals. "Spacetime is infinitely big now, so we use normal, continuous Fourier transforms to rewrite the action as"</li> <li><strong>Functional determinant</strong>: Determinant of an operator governing fluctuations, whose logarithm yields vacuum energy. "Gel'fand--Yaglom theorem for one-dimensional functional determinants in a finite interval"</li> <li><strong>Gel'fand–Yaglom theorem</strong>: Method to compute one-dimensional functional determinants via solutions to an initial value problem. "using the Gel'fand--Yaglom theorem for one-dimensional functional determinants in a finite interval"</li> <li><strong>Gauge boson</strong>: Force-carrying field associated with gauge symmetries (e.g., photon, gluon). "Consider the Lagrangrian density of a (non-Abelian) gauge boson:"</li> <li><strong>Gauge invariance</strong>: Symmetry under local gauge transformations; its breaking by regulators can be problematic. "simple cut-off regularization can be problematic for gauge theories as it breaks the gauge invariance"</li> <li><strong>Gamma function Γ</strong>: Special function extending factorial to complex numbers, often appearing in dimensional regularization. "Γ(-\tfrac{d-1}2)"</li> <li><strong>Heaviside step function</strong>: Piecewise function used to define spatial regions (e.g., finite-thickness plates). "where $H$ is the Heaviside step function."</li> <li><strong>Lagrangian density</strong>: Field-theory function whose integral gives the action governing dynamics. "We have the Lagrangian density"</li> <li><strong>Linear covariant gauge</strong>: Class of gauge-fixing conditions parameterized linearly to handle gauge redundancy. "work in a general linear covariant gauge"</li> <li><strong>Lorentz-index notation</strong>: Indexing convention for four-vectors in relativistic field theory. "I use Lorentz-index notation $v_\mu$ to write four-dimensional vectors"</li> <li><strong>MIT bag model</strong>: Hadron model where quarks are confined in a finite region with specific boundary conditions. "the MIT bag model for hadrons"</li> <li><strong>Mode expansion</strong>: Decomposition of fields into discrete modes satisfying boundary conditions. "We use the mode expansion"</li> <li><strong>Neumann boundary conditions</strong>: Boundary conditions fixing the normal derivative of the field to vanish on the surface. "This means that a magnetic conductor translates to Neumann boundary conditions on the electric field."</li> <li><strong>Non-Abelian</strong>: Gauge groups with non-commuting generators, leading to self-interacting gauge bosons. "a (non-Abelian) gauge boson"</li> <li><strong>Nondynamic background field</strong>: External field added to the action without its own dynamics to implement constraints. "Here, $\sigma$ is a nondynamic background field."</li> <li><strong>Path integral</strong>: Functional integral over field configurations that encodes quantum amplitudes. "In this approach, one lets the fields free everywhere in spacetime, and one introduces the boundary conditions through a Dirac-$\delta$ in the path integral:"</li> <li><strong>Perfect electric conductor</strong>: Idealized material enforcing vanishing tangential electric field at its surface. "For a perfect electric conductor, the boundary condition for the electric field is $E_x=0E_y=0$ on the surface of the plate"</li> <li><strong>Perfect magnetic conductor</strong>: Idealized material enforcing vanishing normal electric field and vanishing tangential magnetic field. "For a perfect magnetic conductor, we have $E_z=0B_x=0B_y=0$ for the magnetic field instead."</li> <li><strong>Phase shifts</strong>: Changes in wave phase due to scattering, used to compute determinants and energies. "Graham et al. use phase shifts to compute this"</li> <li><strong>Propagator</strong>: Green’s function describing field propagation; its determinant contributes to vacuum energy. "the vacuum energy is given by half the logarithm of the determinant of the propagator:"</li> <li><strong>QCD vacuum</strong>: Ground state of quantum chromodynamics, with nontrivial structure like confinement. "the dual superconductor picture of the QCD vacuum"</li> <li><strong>QED</strong>: Quantum electrodynamics, the quantum field theory of electromagnetic interactions. "Eventually, though, we are interested in QED and Yang--Mills theory"</li> <li><strong>Riemann zeta function ζ</strong>: Special function appearing in regularized sums/integrals in quantum field theory. "ζ(-d+1)"</li> <li><strong>Robin boundary conditions</strong>: Mixed boundary conditions involving a linear combination of the field and its derivative. "considering more general Robin boundary conditions instead:"</li> <li><strong>Vacuum energy</strong>: Zero-point energy of quantum fields; differences yield Casimir forces. "the vacuum energy is given by half the logarithm of the determinant of the propagator:"</li> <li><strong>Wick-rotated spacetime</strong>: Euclideanized time coordinate to simplify integrals by avoiding oscillatory factors. "I work in Wick-rotated spacetime (four spatial dimensions) to get rid of bothersome factors of $i$."
- Yang–Mills theory: Non-Abelian gauge theory underlying the strong and weak nuclear forces. "Eventually, though, we are interested in QED and Yang--Mills theory"
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.