Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Charge-dependent scalarization of Einstein- Euler-Heisenberg black holes

Published 15 May 2026 in gr-qc and hep-th | (2605.15566v1)

Abstract: Charge-dependent scalarization of the Einstein-Euler-Heisenberg (EEH) black hole is carried out in the EEH-scalar theory by introducing an exponential scalar coupling with $α$ coupling constant to the Maxwell and nonlinear electrodynamic terms. The bald black hole (EEHBH) is described by mass $M$ and arbitrary magnetic charge $q$ and has a single horizon when choosing the action parameter $μ=0.3$. The spontaneous scalarization ($α+$) of this black hole is available for charge $0<q< q_c=1.115$ and positive $α$, whereas its new scalarization ($α^-$) occurs for $q> q_c$ and negative $α$. The former case of $q=0.5$ implies infinite branches of scalarized EEHBHs but its fundamental branch ($n=0$) is stable against radial perturbations, while the latter cases of $q=2,20$ show two stable single branches of scalarized EEHBHs.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates how exponential scalar coupling in EEH theory leads to charge-dependent scalarization, bypassing the no-hair theorem to produce 'hairy' black holes.
  • It employs numerical analysis and resonance methods to delineate distinct scalarization regimes for low and high charge values, with a critical charge q_c marking the transition.
  • The study identifies stability criteria for both infinite and single scalarized branches, offering insights for quantum-corrected strong gravity models.

Charge-Dependent Scalarization in Einstein–Euler–Heisenberg Black Holes

Introduction and Context

This work investigates scalarization phenomena in black holes arising in the Einstein–Euler–Heisenberg-scalar (EEHS) theory, wherein the classical Einstein–Maxwell paradigm is extended by both quantum one-loop effects (modeled via the Euler–Heisenberg non-linear electrodynamics term, parameterized by μ\mu) and a real scalar field ϕ\phi coupled exponentially with strength α\alpha to both Maxwell and non-linear electrodynamic sectors. Unlike the Reissner–Nordström solution, the EEH black hole admits solutions with a single event horizon for unrestricted values of magnetic charge qq, provided that μ>0.08\mu>0.08 when M=1M=1. The no-scalar-hair theorem, normally precluding stationary scalar configurations for minimally coupled fields, is bypassed here via non-minimal couplings.

Scalarization—tachyonic instability of the scalar sector resulting in new "hairy" black hole branches—has previously been discussed for the EEH solution under limited couplings (e.g., only to Maxwell, or with specific potentials). This work addresses comprehensive charge-dependence of scalarization when ϕ\phi is coupled exponentially to both matter sectors, delineating the parameter domains for spontaneous scalarization and stability of the resulting solutions.

EEHS Theory and Background Solutions

The action of the EEHS theory is given by: SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right] where F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} and α\alpha controls the strength of the scalar coupling.

The prototypical "bald" (scalar-free) EEH solution is parameterized by mass ϕ\phi0, charge ϕ\phi1, and ϕ\phi2. For ϕ\phi3, the metric function with a single horizon reads: ϕ\phi4 Compared to the Reissner–Nordström case (ϕ\phi5), the EEH solution's horizon structure is modified, notably without restrictions on maximum charge, and with altered thermodynamic properties (no Davies point in the specific heat, distinct mass functions for large ϕ\phi6). Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: (Left) Outer horizons ϕ\phi7 for EEHBH compared to Reissner–Nordström; (Right) Mass functions ϕ\phi8 for various ϕ\phi9 and α\alpha0.

Scalarization Onset: Charge Dependence and Critical Thresholds

The scalar field can develop a tachyonic instability, leading to spontaneous scalarization. The mechanism depends on the sign and magnitude of the effective scalar mass squared: α\alpha1 The sign of α\alpha2 required for instability depends on α\alpha3:

  • For α\alpha4: α\alpha5 for α\alpha6, permitting spontaneous scalarization ("α\alpha7 scalarization").
  • For α\alpha8: α\alpha9 requires qq0, corresponding to a distinct family of solutions ("qq1 scalarization").

These regimes are separated by a critical charge qq2 derived via the Hod resonance method. The resonance condition identifies qq3 as the value where no tachyonic instability exists at the horizon, dictating the boundary between the two scalarization types. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Effective scalar mass as a function of qq4 and qq5; the sign of qq6 for instability flips at qq7.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Resonance curve for the critical onset of qq8 scalarization, showing loci of qq9 and μ>0.08\mu>0.080.

Scalar clouds at the bifurcation points act as seeds for new black hole branches. For μ>0.08\mu>0.081, there is a tower of scalarized "clouds" indexed by node number μ>0.08\mu>0.082, leading to an infinite set of scalarized branches.

Branch Structure and Instability Conditions

Tachyonic instability and scalarized branch structure are compared via several criteria:

  • Sufficient condition for instability: μ>0.08\mu>0.083, where μ>0.08\mu>0.084.
  • Precise threshold (μ>0.08\mu>0.085) via direct perturbative analysis: The lowest μ>0.08\mu>0.086 for which an exponentially growing (μ>0.08\mu>0.087) scalar mode exists. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Instability threshold curves μ>0.08\mu>0.088 and μ>0.08\mu>0.089 vs M=1M=10; positive and negative regions delineate domains of scalarization.

For M=1M=11 (M=1M=12), the analysis yields:

  • M=1M=13
  • Infinite branches indexed by M=1M=14, with the M=1M=15 branch exhibiting stability.

For M=1M=16 (M=1M=17):

  • M=1M=18 and M=1M=19, respectively
  • Only a single branch per ϕ\phi0 is observed, both stable.

The scalar cloud eigenvalues and corresponding critical ϕ\phi1 were numerically confirmed. Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: (Left) Growth rate ϕ\phi2 vs ϕ\phi3 for ϕ\phi4 (threshold crossings); (Right) Static scalar clouds ϕ\phi5 at ϕ\phi6 for the lowest three branches.

Full Numerical Solutions and Features

Full scalarized EEHBH solutions were constructed by integrating the ODEs resulting from the coupled Einstein, Maxwell, and scalar field equations, using appropriate boundary conditions at the subextremal horizon and spatial infinity. The solutions interpolate between hairy black holes and Reissner–Nordström-like geometries. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Metric and scalar profiles for scalarized EEHBHs at ϕ\phi7, ϕ\phi8, and ϕ\phi9.

Distinct features include:

  • The SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]0 (SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]1) branch exhibits typical scalar hair and a horizon radius at SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]2.
  • The SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]3 and SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]4 branches manifest for negative SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]5, with smooth metric and scalar profiles, and adjusted horizon radii.

At the transition SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]6, the solution degenerates to a Schwarzschild black hole with constant scalar hair, representing a bifurcation point between two qualitatively distinct scalarization regimes.

Stability Analysis of Scalarized Branches

Stability under radial (SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]7-mode) scalar perturbations is tested via the associated Schrödinger-type equation for the perturbation, examining the sign structure of the effective potential SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]8 and direct numerical evaluation of SEEHS=116πd4xg[R2μϕμϕeαϕ2(FμF2)]S_{\rm EEHS}=\frac{1}{16 \pi}\int d^4 x\sqrt{-g}\left[ R-2\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi-e^{-\alpha \phi^2} \left(\mathcal{F}-\mu \mathcal{F}^2\right)\right]9 (the growth/decay rate). Figure 7

Figure 7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Scalar perturbation potentials F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}0 for F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}1 and various F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}2.

Despite small negative regions near the horizons, direct calculations confirm negative F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}3 for F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}4 and single branches, indicating stability against radial perturbations. Figure 8

Figure 8

Figure 8

Figure 8: Growth rate F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}5 as function of F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}6 for F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}7; all scalarized branches show stability for F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}8.

Figure 9

Figure 9

Figure 9: Zoomed-in view of F=FμνFμν\mathcal{F}=F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}9 for negative α\alpha0 at α\alpha1, confirming stability of α\alpha2 scalarized branches.

The excited α\alpha3 branches at α\alpha4 (as in other scalarization scenarios) are expected to be unstable.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The study elucidates how the presence of non-linear electrodynamics terms and scalar couplings to multiple matter sectors alters the spectrum and stability of black hole solutions. Two robust scalarization regimes emerge:

  1. α\alpha5-scalarization (α\alpha6): Infinite stable and unstable branches (only α\alpha7 is stable), driven by positive coupling and enabled by tachyonic instability in the scalar sector.
  2. α\alpha8-scalarization (α\alpha9): Single stable branches at large charge, requiring negative coupling constants.

At the underlying theoretical level, the result demonstrates a deepened structure of black hole solutions in modified gravity with non-linear matter couplings. Practically, this analysis identifies stable parameter regimes for possible endpoints of scalarization transitions and has implications for the phenomenology of black hole scalar hair, quantum-corrected strong-gravity signatures, and constraints on non-minimal couplings in gravity.

Conclusion

This analysis systematically maps the charge-dependent scalarization landscape of EEH black holes in the presence of exponential scalar coupling to both Maxwell and non-linear electrodynamics sectors. It establishes the existence and stability of infinite scalarized branches for ϕ\phi00 and single branches for ϕ\phi01, sharply distinguishing these two regimes. The results offer a thorough framework for further studies of black holes in semi-classical gravity, the phenomenology of hairy compact objects, and the non-perturbative implications of quantum corrections in strong-field scenarios.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 7 likes about this paper.