Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Adjacency-Diametrical Matrix (AD Matrix)

Updated 10 January 2026
  • The adjacency-diametrical matrix is a hybrid graph descriptor that combines immediate adjacency with farthest (diametrical) distance measures to capture both local and global structure.
  • It represents connections with weighted entries—using 1 for adjacent vertices and the graph diameter for diametrically distant pairs—facilitating comprehensive network analysis.
  • Its spectral properties and determinant formulations yield valuable insights into graph invariants, supporting advanced applications in network comparison and isomorphism testing.

The adjacency-diametrical matrix (AD matrix) is a distance-weighted vertex-pair descriptor for simple, connected graphs, unifying adjacency and extremal distance information into a single n×nn \times n matrix. For a graph GG with vertex set V={v1,,vn}V=\{v_1,\dots,v_n\} and diameter dd, the (i,j)(i,j) entry of AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) is $1$ if viv_i and vjv_j are adjacent, dd if they are at diametrical distance, and $0$ otherwise. This construction synthesizes adjacency matrices, distance matrices, and higher-order combinatorial topology, subsuming key statistics and network invariants via explicit algebraic and spectral analysis (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026). Variants such as the neighbor (AD) matrix encode histogram distance distributions (Roginski et al., 2015), and the spectral excess paradigm connects AD matrices to polynomial expressions in the adjacency algebra (Fiol et al., 2019).

1. Mathematical Definition and Structure

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a connected graph of order nn and diameter dd. The adjacency-diametrical matrix AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) is defined by

(AD(G))ij={1,if dG(vi,vj)=1, d,if dG(vi,vj)=d, 0,otherwise,(\mathrm{AD}(G))_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } d_G(v_i,v_j)=1, \ d, & \text{if } d_G(v_i,v_j)=d, \ 0, & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases}

where dG(vi,vj)d_G(v_i, v_j) denotes the graph distance. That is,

AD(G)=A1(G)+dAd(G),\mathrm{AD}(G) = A_1(G) + d \cdot A_d(G),

where Ak(G)A_k(G) is the 0-1 matrix marking vertex pairs at distance kk. For d=2d=2, AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) coincides with the customary (unweighted) distance matrix, while for d=1d=1 it reduces to the adjacency matrix (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026).

The neighbor (AD) matrix MNn×dM\in\mathbb{N}^{n\times d} is defined by

Mi,k={vjV:dG(vi,vj)=k},k=1,,d,i=1,,n,M_{i,k} = \left| \{ v_j\in V : d_G(v_i,v_j)=k \} \right|, \qquad k=1,\ldots,d, \quad i=1,\ldots,n,

encoding for each vertex the number of neighbors at every possible distance (Roginski et al., 2015).

2. Spectral Properties of AD Matrices

Explicit spectra have been determined for several graph families (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026):

  • Paths PnP_n: The characteristic polynomial of AD(Pn)\mathrm{AD}(P_n) is

ΦAD(Pn)(x)=Φn(x)(n1)2Φn2(x)+2(1n),\varPhi_{\mathrm{AD}(P_n)}(x) = \varPhi_n(x) - (n-1)^2\,\varPhi_{n-2}(x) + 2(1-n),

where Φk(x)\varPhi_k(x) is the characteristic polynomial of the path adjacency matrix.

  • Cycles CnC_n: If nn is even (diameter d=n/2d=n/2),

λk=2cos(2πk/n)+(n/2)(1)k,k=0,,n1,\lambda_k = 2\cos(2\pi k/n) + (n/2)(-1)^k, \quad k=0,\ldots,n-1,

and if nn is odd,

λk=2cos(2πk/n)+(n1)(1)kcos(πk/n).\lambda_k = 2\cos(2\pi k/n) + (n-1)(-1)^k\cos(\pi k/n).

  • Double-star graphs Sp,qS_{p,q}: The characteristic polynomial is

xn4[x4(9n1n28n18n2+8)x2+4(n1n2n1n2+1)]x^{n-4}\left[x^4 - (9n_1 n_2 - 8n_1 - 8n_2 + 8)x^2 + 4(n_1 n_2 - n_1 - n_2 + 1)\right]

with n1=p+1n_1=p+1, n2=q+1n_2=q+1, n=n1+n2n=n_1+n_2, diameter d=3d=3.

For graph products, the AD spectrum transforms according to explicit rules. For Cartesian products of distance-regular graphs GG and HH, one has

Spec(AD(GH))={λi+μj+(dG+dH)γiδj:1iG,1jH},\mathrm{Spec}(\mathrm{AD}(G \square H)) = \{ \lambda_i + \mu_j + (d_G + d_H)\gamma_i\delta_j : 1\leq i\leq |G|, 1\leq j \leq |H| \},

where the λi\lambda_i, μj\mu_j are adjacency eigenvalues, and γi\gamma_i, δj\delta_j are co-eigenvalues for the respective diametrical adjacency operators.

3. Determinant Formulation and Combinatorial Interpretation

The determinant of AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) admits a partition-based expansion (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026). For an adjacency-diametrical partition S\mathcal{S} organizing V(G)V(G) into pairwise adjacent/antipodal pairs and adjacency-diametrical cycles, one has

detAD(G)=S(1)np(S)p1(S)2p1(S)d2a(S)+a1(S),\det\,\mathrm{AD}(G) = \sum_{\mathcal{S}} (-1)^{n-p(\mathcal{S})-p_1(\mathcal{S})} 2^{p_1(\mathcal{S})} d^{2a(\mathcal{S}) + a_1(\mathcal{S})},

with p(S)=p(\mathcal{S})= number of two-vertex parts, p1(S)=p_1(\mathcal{S})= number of cycles of length at least $3$, a(S)=a(\mathcal{S})= number of antipodal pairs, and a1(S)=a_1(\mathcal{S})= number of antipodal edges in cycles.

For example, P4P_4 has determinant $4$, exactly matching the combinatorial partition analysis. This expansion encapsulates contributions from both adjacency and diametrical relationships.

4. Bipartiteness, Characterization, and Polynomials

A graph GG is diametrical bipartite if it is bipartite and no two vertices in the same part are at diametrical distance. This occurs precisely when the diameter dd is odd (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026). The following conditions are equivalent for connected GG:

(i) GG is diametrical bipartite. (ii) The weighted graph GG\mathscr{G}_G defined by AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) is bipartite. (iii) Every adjacency-diametrical cycle has even length.

The spectrum of AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G) in this case is symmetric about zero; all odd-index coefficients in the characteristic polynomial vanish. This criterion provides a spectral and combinatorial tool for bipartite characterization.

5. Bounds and Extremal Eigenvalues

Let λ1λ2λn\lambda_1 \geq \lambda_2 \geq \cdots \geq \lambda_n denote the eigenvalues of AD(G)\mathrm{AD}(G), m=Em=|E| the number of edges, and d^(v)\hat{d}(v) the diametrical degree of vertex vv (number of vertices at distance dd).

Key spectral facts (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026):

  • i=1nλi=tr(AD(G))=0\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i = \mathrm{tr}(\mathrm{AD}(G)) = 0
  • i=1nλi2=2m+d2d^(G)\sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i^2 = 2m + d^2 \hat{d}(G)

The spectral radius obeys

λ1n1n(2m+d2d^(G)),\lambda_1 \leq \sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n} (2m + d^2 \hat{d}(G))},

and for diametrical bipartite GG, the smallest eigenvalue satisfies

λnm+d22d^(G).|\lambda_n| \leq \sqrt{m + \frac{d^2}{2} \hat{d}(G)}.

Bounds in terms of the minimum/maximum diametrical degree δ^(v)=deg(v)+dd^(v)\hat{\delta}(v) = \deg(v) + d \cdot \hat{d}(v) are tight for AD-regular graphs.

6. Relationship to Neighbor Matrix, Distance Matrices, and Algebraic Framework

The neighbor matrix MM defined by Mi,kM_{i,k} (the number of vertices at distance kk from viv_i) encodes all frequency data for distance distributions up to the diameter (Roginski et al., 2015). It generalizes the adjacency matrix (column k=1k=1), the degree sequence, and contains key graph invariants:

  • Diameter, radius, center, periphery
  • Number of edges, graph density
  • Closeness centrality: CC(vi)=n1k=1dkMi,kCC(v_i) = \frac{n-1}{\sum_{k=1}^d k M_{i,k}}
  • Average distance (Wiener index divided by (n2)\binom{n}{2}): 1n(n1)i=1nk=1dkMi,k\frac{1}{n(n-1)} \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{k=1}^d k M_{i,k}

MM provides a histogram of local-global distance structure, allowing both fine-grained and summary comparison of graph topology.

The spectral excess theorem (Fiol et al., 2019) connects AD matrices and the adjacency algebra of regular graphs: the diametrical matrix ADA_D is a polynomial in AA precisely when arithmetic/harmonic means of vertex excesses attain equality with certain predistance polynomial sums. In distance-regular graphs, this polynomial representation is unique, and the spectrum of ADA_D derives from the predistance polynomials evaluated at adjacency eigenvalues.

7. Applications and Structural Insights

AD and neighbor matrices support advanced graph comparison, serving as discriminators when classical invariants fail. For graph isomorphism, a mismatch in the AD matrix immediately rules out equivalence; matched matrices signal identical distance distributions (Roginski et al., 2015). Norm-based matrix comparisons (e.g., Frobenius norm) quantify topological “distance” between graphs.

Vertex centrality and structural influence are refined by recomputing MM post-removal, measuring deviation in the distance matrix. Large changes correspond to vertices pivotal for short paths, sharpening the identification of topologically significant vertices.

Under graph operations, the AD matrix transforms in structured fashion, yielding explicit spectra for joins, lexicographic products (via tensor-product decompositions), and Cartesian products given distance-regularity (Amruthavarshini et al., 3 Jan 2026). This behavior enables analysis of composite networks and facilitates the study of spectral and combinatorial invariants in expanded graph classes.

In summary, the adjacency-diametrical matrix is a foundational descriptor synthesizing adjacency, extremal, and distributional graph properties, serving both theoretical characterization and practical network analysis across families of graphs and graph operations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (3)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Adjacency-Diametrical Matrix (AD Matrix).