Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Dymnikova Regular Black Hole

Updated 17 January 2026
  • Dymnikova regular black holes are static, spherically symmetric solutions that replace the central singularity with a smooth de Sitter-like core and exhibit an inner and outer horizon.
  • The model’s dual-horizon structure and modified thermodynamic properties, including a positive Hawking temperature, offer insights into emission spectra and quantum gravity effects.
  • Integrating higher-dimensional analyses, the construction provides empirical constraints from EHT observations and connects broader regular black hole research through its non-singular behavior.

Dymnikova Regular Black Hole

A Dymnikova regular black hole is a static, spherically symmetric solution of the gravitational field equations that replaces the central singularity of the standard Schwarzschild solution with a smooth de Sitter-like core. The Dymnikova profile is realized via a smooth energy-density distribution and produces a spacetime with two horizons—an inner (Cauchy) and an outer (event) horizon. Recent developments generalize the Dymnikova construction to arbitrary spacetime dimensions, analyze its thermodynamic properties, photon trajectories, observational signatures, and confront the model with Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) data to yield empirical constraints (Errehymy et al., 10 Jan 2026).

1. Spacetime Metric and Defining Parameters

The Dymnikova-type metric in DD spacetime dimensions is

ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^2

with the lapse function

f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]

where the parameters are defined as: rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}} Here, r0r_0 encodes the de Sitter core length scale, ρ0\rho_0 is the central energy density, rsr_s is the would-be Schwarzschild radius in DD dimensions, MM is the ADM mass, and ΩD2=2π(D1)/2/Γ(D12)\Omega_{D-2} = 2\pi^{(D-1)/2}/\Gamma(\frac{D-1}{2}) gives the area of the unit ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^20-sphere.

The exponential profile for ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^21 ensures the metric is regular at ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^22, with a finite curvature invariant.

2. Horizon Structure

Dymnikova regular black holes typically exhibit two horizons, determined by real positive roots ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^23 of ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^24: ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^25 Under physical conditions ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^26, the roots are: ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^27 The solution thus interpolates between a de Sitter core near ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^28 and an asymptotically Schwarzschild geometry at large ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD22ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2\,d\Omega_{D-2}^29.

3. Photon Dynamics and Black Hole Shadow

Null geodesics in the equatorial plane f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]0 with energy f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]1 and angular momentum f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]2 are governed by

f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]3

The photon sphere is located at f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]4 such that

f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]5

The shadow radius observed at infinity is

f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]6

Numerical analysis reveals f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]7 decreases as f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]8 increases at fixed mass and f(r)=1rsD3rD3[1exp(rD1rD1)]f(r) = 1 - \frac{r_s^{D-3}}{r^{D-3}} \left[1 - \exp\left(-\frac{r^{D-1}}{r_\star^{D-1}}\right)\right]9 (the gravitational potential "dilutes" in higher rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}0), but grows with both mass rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}1 and Schwarzschild radius rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}2 (Errehymy et al., 10 Jan 2026).

4. Thermodynamic Properties

Hawking Temperature

The Hawking temperature is determined by the surface gravity at the outer horizon rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}3: rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}4 rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}5 is positive-definite, increases with rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}6, rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}7, and rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}8.

Entropy and Energy Emission

The Bekenstein–Hawking entropy is

rD1=r02rsD3,r02=(D1)(D2)16πρ0,rsD3=16πM(D2)ΩD2r_\star^{D-1} = r_0^2\,r_s^{D-3}\,, \qquad r_0^2 = \frac{(D-1)(D-2)}{16\pi\rho_0}\,, \qquad r_s^{D-3} = \frac{16\pi M}{(D-2)\,\Omega_{D-2}}9

The spectral energy emission rate in r0r_00 dimensions, via summing absorption cross-sections or greybody factors, is given by

r0r_01

or, equivalently, via the absorption cross-section

r0r_02

Increasing r0r_03 suppresses emission; increasing r0r_04 or r0r_05 enhances it.

5. Observational Signatures and EHT Constraints

By matching the predicted shadow radius to EHT observations (specifically M87* and Sgr A*), empirical bounds on r0r_06 and r0r_07 are obtained:

  • For Sgr A* (1r0r_08): r0r_09, ρ0\rho_00
  • For M87* (1ρ0\rho_01): ρ0\rho_02, ρ0\rho_03 (Errehymy et al., 10 Jan 2026)

These intervals require ρ0\rho_04 to be much less than the horizon size for astrophysical black holes. The suppression of the shadow radius at higher ρ0\rho_05 implies reduced projected diameters in extra-dimensional scenarios.

6. Physical Interpretation and Theoretical Context

The Dymnikova construction realizes a regular black hole by exponentiating curvature corrections, effectively modeling a "core removal" via a nonsingular, de Sitter-like region with finite central energy density. The core scale ρ0\rho_06 sets a transition between quantum-modified (regular) and classical (Schwarzschild-like) geometry. In the limit ρ0\rho_07, the standard singular solution is recovered. In contrast to four-dimensional regular black holes, which often require nonstandard matter or nonlinear electrodynamics, the higher-dimensional Dymnikova solution can be embedded within the framework of effective theories with infinite towers of higher-curvature terms (Bueno et al., 2024).

Higher ρ0\rho_08 alters both the causal structure (horizon configuration) and observational characteristics (shadow, thermodynamic observables). The presence of two horizons (event and Cauchy) is generic for ρ0\rho_09, with the Cauchy horizon located near the core scale and the outer horizon close to the Schwarzschild radius.

Thermodynamically, the presence of a de Sitter-like core modifies evaporation: rsr_s0 remains positive and nonzero at extremality, and the emission spectrum is regularized; this opens a window for possible quantum gravity signatures in black hole observations.

7. Relation to Broader Regular Black Hole Research

The Dymnikova profile sits within a broader class of regular black holes, including Hayward and Bardeen-type metrics, and can be realized as a special case of the exponential resummation of higher-curvature corrections in “quasi-topological” gravities (Bueno et al., 2024, Konoplya et al., 2024, Arbelaez, 29 Sep 2025). These constructions generically provide: (i) complete resolution of the central singularity (rsr_s1, rsr_s2 finite at rsr_s3), (ii) two-horizon structure, (iii) smooth matching to Schwarzschild/Tangherlini at large rsr_s4, and (iv) distinctive gravitational wave and shadow signatures potentially detectable in current and future observations.

The main physical upshot of the Dymnikova construction is the consistent realization of singularity-free black holes that are sharply constrained by EHT data—offering both a phenomenological tool for probing Planck-scale regularization and a theoretical template for embedding non-singular objects into higher-dimensional gravitational models.


For explicit technical details, analytic formulas for horizons, shadows, thermodynamics, and empirical constraint intervals, see (Errehymy et al., 10 Jan 2026). The integration and comparative context with other higher-dimensional regular black hole models are presented in (Bueno et al., 2024, Konoplya et al., 2024, Arbelaez, 29 Sep 2025).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Dymnikova Regular Black Hole.