Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Tuxanidy–Panario Equidistribution Estimate

Updated 18 January 2026
  • The paper establishes that base‑b palindromes are nearly uniformly distributed modulo d² for all square‑free d up to x^(1/4–ε) with a strong logarithmic error saving.
  • It employs Fourier expansion and a Baier–Zhao large sieve for square moduli to convert L² bounds into uniform (L∞) error estimates.
  • This result underpins analytic number theory advances in counting square‑free palindromes and inspires further research on sparse digital structures.

The Tuxanidy–Panario equidistribution estimate is a quantitative result on the uniformity of base-bb palindromes modulo small square moduli. Its principal application is in analytic number theory, particularly in counting palindromic numbers with additional arithmetic constraints, such as square-freeness. The core assertion is that, subject to mild coprimality restrictions, base-bb palindromes are equidistributed across residue classes modulo d2d^2 for square-free dd up to x1/4εx^{1/4-\varepsilon}, with a strong logarithmic saving in the error term. This estimate underpins recent advances in understanding the asymptotic distribution of constrained palindromic numbers, most notably the infinitude and density of square-free palindromes (Johnston et al., 11 Jan 2026).

1. Formal Statement of the Equidistribution Estimate

Let b2b \geq 2 be a fixed base. Define Pb(x)={nx:nP^*_b(x) = \{ n \leq x : n is a base-bb palindrome and (n,b3b)=1}(n, b^3-b) = 1 \}, the restricted set excluding palindromes with trivial local obstructions. Let Pb(y;a,d2):=#{ny:nPb(x),na(modd2)}P_b^*(y;a,d^2) := \#\{ n \leq y : n \in P_b^*(x), n \equiv a \pmod{d^2} \}.

Proposition (Tuxanidy–Panario, Prop. 10.1): For any ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and any A>0A > 0, there exists x0=x0(b,ε,A)x_0 = x_0(b, \varepsilon, A) such that for all xx0x \geq x_0:

dx1/4ε (d,b3b)=1μ2(d)supyxmaxaZPb(y;a,d2)1d2#Pb(y)b,ε,A#Pb(x)(logx)A\sum_{\substack{d \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon} \ (d, b^3-b) = 1}} \mu^2(d) \sup_{y \leq x} \max_{a \in \mathbb{Z}} \left| P^*_b(y;a,d^2) - \frac{1}{d^2} \# P_b^*(y) \right| \ll_{b,\varepsilon,A} \frac{ \# P_b^*(x)} {(\log x)^A}

That is, for all square-free dd coprime to b3bb^3-b with dx1/4εd \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon}, the palindromes in Pb(x)P_b^*(x) are distributed nearly uniformly among the d2d^2 residue classes modulo d2d^2, with a power-saving in the logarithm of xx.

2. Structure of the Error Term

The error is given by:

dx1/4ε (d,b3b)=1μ2(d)supyxmaxaZnPb(y)(1na(modd2)1d2)b,ε,A#Pb(x)(logx)A\sum_{\substack{d \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon} \ (d, b^3-b) = 1}} \mu^2(d) \sup_{y \leq x} \max_{a \in \mathbb{Z}} \left| \sum_{n \in P_b^*(y)} \left( \mathbf 1_{n \equiv a \pmod{d^2}} - \frac{1}{d^2} \right) \right| \ll_{b, \varepsilon, A} \frac{ \# P_b^*(x) }{ (\log x)^A }

The implied constant depends on bb, ε\varepsilon, and AA but not on xx. The use of the square-free indicator μ2(d)\mu^2(d) ensures that only square-free dd appear. The result provides a uniform estimate in yxy \leq x and over all residue classes aa, with an error that is arbitrarily small relative to the main term by taking AA large.

3. Methods and Proof Outline

The proof comprises three main analytic steps:

  • Fourier Expansion of the Palindrome Indicator: The defining property of a palindrome allows the set Pb(y)P_b^*(y) to be encoded via a short exponential sum over digital variables. Classical Fourier analysis is then used to express the indicator of na(modd2)n \equiv a \pmod{d^2} as an additive character sum, facilitating manipulations modulo d2d^2.
  • Large Sieve for Square Moduli: The proof's crux is the application of the Baier–Zhao large sieve inequality tailored for square moduli, bounding sums of the type:

dDa(modd2)nPb(x)e(and2)2\sum_{d \leq D} \sum_{a \pmod{d^2}} \left|\sum_{n \in P_b^*(x)} e\left(\frac{an}{d^2}\right) \right|^2

for Dx1/4εD \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon}. A detailed analysis of the Fourier coefficients specific to palindromes ensures that the L2L^2-average over all (a,d)(a, d) is εx(logx)O(1)\ll_\varepsilon x (\log x)^{O(1)}.

  • Transition from L2L^2 to LL^\infty Bound: Standard arguments (Cauchy–Schwarz or Gallagher’s lemma) convert the L2L^2-bound into the desired uniform (sup-norm) bound over all residue classes and yxy \leq x.

4. Foundational Definitions and Supporting Results

Base-bb palindrome: An integer nn is a palindrome in base bb if its base-bb digit expansion n=inibin = \sum_i n_i b^i satisfies symmetry: ni=nN1in_i = n_{N-1-i}.

Restricted set Pb(x)P_b^*(x): To prevent trivial local obstructions (e.g., failure of equidistribution for divisors of b3bb^3-b), palindromes are restricted to those with (n,b3b)=1(n, b^3-b)=1.

Relevant counting functions:

  • Pb(y;a,d2)=#{ny,nPb(x),na(modd2)}P_b^*(y;a,d^2) = \#\{ n \leq y, n \in P_b^*(x), n \equiv a \pmod{d^2} \}
  • #Pb(y)y\# P_b^*(y) \approx \sqrt{y} for large yy.

Tools:

  • The large sieve for square moduli, in the form refined by Baier and Zhao, provides critical estimates for exponential sums over sparse sets like palindromes.
  • Standard Fourier analysis, notably the expansion of indicators for congruence classes as sums over additive characters.

5. Application in Analytic Frameworks

In the context of proving the infinitude of square-free palindromes, the estimate is crucial in the Möbius inversion method, which expresses the count of square-free palindromes as:

Qb(x)=nPb(x)μ2(n)=dx, (d,b3b)=1μ(d) #{nPb(x):d2n}Q_b^*(x) = \sum_{n \in P_b^*(x)} \mu^2(n) = \sum_{d \leq \sqrt{x},\ (d,b^3-b)=1} \mu(d)\ \#\{ n \in P_b^*(x) : d^2 \mid n \}

The sum is split at x1/4εx^{1/4-\varepsilon}:

  • For dx1/4εd \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon}, the equidistribution estimate replaces the count of n0(modd2)n \equiv 0 \pmod{d^2} among palindromes with the expected main term #Pb(x)/d2\#P_b^*(x)/d^2, up to a negligible logarithmic error. This uniformly small error ensures sharp asymptotics for the Möbius-inverted sum.
  • For d>x1/4εd > x^{1/4-\varepsilon}, the error term exceeds the threshold of the Tuxanidy–Panario estimate, necessitating alternate techniques—principally the hybrid pp-adic/Archimedean van der Corput process.

6. Scope and Limitations

The equidistribution estimate holds only for moduli dx1/4εd \leq x^{1/4-\varepsilon}. For larger dd, the method does not suffice, and exponential sum techniques (van der Corput differencing and Poisson summation) are required. The error savings are polynomially small only in logx\log x, not in xx itself, which is sufficient for isolating the main term but not for more delicate secondary analysis.

The coprimality requirement (d,b3b)=1(d, b^3-b)=1 is essential; otherwise, local obstructions disrupt equidistribution. Numerical results indicate that true equidistribution may persist far beyond the proven range (for d2bN/poly(N)d^2 \approx b^N/\text{poly}(N)), but current large sieve techniques do not capture this due to the sparsity of palindromes.

7. Significance and Further Directions

The Tuxanidy–Panario equidistribution result stands as the strongest analytic input for controlling the "small square-divisor" regime in Möbius inversion approaches to palindromic problems (Johnston et al., 11 Jan 2026). It demonstrates that base-bb palindromes, save for explicit local exceptions, are essentially uniformly distributed modulo small square moduli. Subsequent advances may hinge on extending large sieve techniques or finding alternative analytic frameworks capable of handling sparser or more structured sets, with implications for broader classes of digital and combinatorial number-theoretic problems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Equidistribution Estimate of Tuxanidy and Panario.