Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Innermost Stable Circular Orbits (ISCOs)

Updated 31 January 2026
  • Innermost Stable Circular Orbits (ISCOs) are the smallest stable circular paths around compact objects, defined by specific conditions on the effective potential.
  • ISCOs determine the inner edges of accretion disks and set characteristic orbital frequencies, influencing phenomena like X-ray emissions and gravitational wave cutoffs.
  • Their sensitivity to factors such as spin, magnetic fields, and higher-dimensional effects makes ISCOs a critical probe for testing general relativity and alternative gravity theories.

The innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) is the smallest-radius circular geodesic around a compact object that is linearly stable against radial perturbations. Originally formulated in the context of general relativity for test particles moving in strong gravitational fields, the ISCO delineates the effective inner edge of accretion disks, marks the onset of rapid orbital inspiral in compact binary coalescence, and fundamentally encodes the interplay between geometry, rotation, multipolar structure, electromagnetic fields, and—when present—self-gravity or additional matter content. The ISCO radius, orbital frequency, and associated epicyclic frequencies are highly sensitive probes of spacetime structure and are instrumental for precision astrophysics.

1. Geodesic Approach and ISCO Conditions

The ISCO is rigorously defined by three conditions on the equatorial circular geodesics of a given stationary, axisymmetric spacetime: existence (r˙=0\dot{r}=0), radial force balance (∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=0), and marginal radial stability (∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=0). For a metric

ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...

the effective potential for a (possibly spinning) particle of energy EE and angular momentum LL is

Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}

(evaluated in the equatorial plane when appropriate). The ISCO radius rISCOr_{\rm ISCO} is determined by: Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0 For stationary axisymmetric spacetimes with equatorial symmetry, the radial and vertical epicyclic frequencies are obtained by linearizing geodesic deviation equations: κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2} The ISCO corresponds to ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=00 and requires ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=01 for vertical stability (Ono et al., 2016).

2. ISCO in Vacuum Black Hole and Neutron Star Spacetimes

In Schwarzschild geometry, the ISCO for test particles lies at ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=02, with ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=03 the ADM mass (Cen et al., 4 May 2025, Song, 2021). In the equatorial Kerr spacetime (spin ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=04), the prograde and retrograde ISCO radii are given by the Bardeen–Press–Teukolsky formula: ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=05 with ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=06, ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=07 (Luk et al., 2018, Tsupko et al., 2016).

For rapidly rotating neutron stars, the ISCO is governed by an interplay of relativistic frame-dragging (Lense–Thirring effect) and quadrupole deformation. The ISCO radius admits a Hartle–Thorne expansion: ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=08 where ∂rVeff=0\partial_r V_{\rm eff}=09, ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=00 (Torok et al., 2014). Empirically, for a wide class of equations of state, the ISCO radius and frequency satisfy EOS-insensitive "universal" polynomial relations in scaled variables ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=01 (∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=02 in ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=03, ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=04 in Hz): ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=05 with ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=06 scatter over 12 nuclear EOS (Luk et al., 2018).

3. Magnetic and Multipolar Effects on ISCO

For magnetized neutron stars, the ISCO is governed by six geometric parameters in the Pachón–Rueda–Sanabria (PRS) solution: mass ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=07, spin ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=08, quadrupole ∂r2Veff=0\partial_r^2 V_{\rm eff}=09, current octupole ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...0, net charge ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...1 (usually set to zero), and magnetic dipole moment ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...2. In this metric, ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...3 enters the ISCO condition at quadratic order, reducing ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...4 as magnetic energy is increasingly significant (Gutierrez-Ruiz et al., 2013, Sanabria-Gómez et al., 2010). For ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...5 (i.e., ds2=−gttdt2+2gtϕdtdϕ+grrdr2+gϕϕdϕ2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...6 GT), the ISCO shift is non-negligible. The impact of strong magnetic fields on the ISCO is analogous in some respects to adding spin:

  • ds2=−gttdt2+2gtÏ•dtdÏ•+grrdr2+gϕϕdÏ•2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...7 decreases monotonically with ds2=−gttdt2+2gtÏ•dtdÏ•+grrdr2+gϕϕdÏ•2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...8
  • Epicyclic frequencies ds2=−gttdt2+2gtÏ•dtdÏ•+grrdr2+gϕϕdÏ•2+...ds^2 = -g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi}dt d\phi + g_{rr}dr^2 + g_{\phi\phi}d\phi^2 + ...9, EE0, EE1 increase as EE2 increases
  • Frame-dragging frequency EE3 is enhanced via electromagnetic contributions to EE4 In the magnetar regime (EE5 G), ISCO corrections reach EE6 and must be included in models of kHz QPOs and continuum spectral fitting (Gutierrez-Ruiz et al., 2013).

At the analytic level, the ISCO radius for a rotating, deformed, magnetized star (Shibata–Sasaki expansion) is

EE7

where EE8, EE9 (quadrupole), and LL0 are in dimensionless units (Sanabria-Gómez et al., 2010).

4. ISCOs Beyond Four-Dimensional General Relativity

In static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat spacetimes with matter fields satisfying reasonable energy conditions, the ISCO radius is universally bounded LL1, with LL2 only for Schwarzschild (Cen et al., 4 May 2025). Electrically charged (Reissner–Nordström), supergravity, and fluid-sphere black holes all obey LL3 (examples: LL4 for LL5).

In higher dimensions (LL6), no such upper bound exists: for LL7, LL8 is unbounded and can be made arbitrarily large by tuning the anisotropic energy-momentum content; for LL9 generically no real ISCO radius exists (Lee et al., 17 Nov 2025). The loss of bounded ISCO reflects the altered centrifugal–gravitational balance in higher dimensions.

In AdS black holes, the ISCO exists only for sufficiently large black hole mass Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}0, and its properties encode nonperturbative effects in the dual CFT (e.g., meta-stable states with binding energies from the radial fluctuations at the ISCO) (Berenstein et al., 2020). In higher-curvature Gauss–Bonnet gravity, the ISCO radius decreases monotonically with the coupling parameter Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}1 and ceases to exist at the Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) bound for probe charge-to-mass ratio (Paul et al., 2024).

5. Spins, Modified Gravity, and Non-Geodesic ISCOs

The ISCO for a spinning (classical) particle in Kerr is displaced owing to spin–curvature coupling. For small spin Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}2,

Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}3

with explicit Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}4 given by (Tsupko et al., 2016, Jefremov et al., 2015). The sign of Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}5 depends on spin–orbit alignment: aligned Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}6 decreases, and anti-aligned Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}7 increases Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}8. In extremal Kerr, corotating orbits have Veff(r)=E2gϕϕ+2ELgtϕ+L2gttgtϕ2−gttgϕϕV_{\rm eff}(r) = \frac{E^2 g_{\phi\phi} + 2EL g_{t\phi} + L^2 g_{tt}}{g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}9 independent of spin.

In modified (Kerr–MOG) gravity, the ISCO radius is always larger than in Kerr, scaling as rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}0 with rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}1 (Lee et al., 2017).

In binary black hole spacetimes (Teo–Wan solution), ISCOs can undergo "catastrophe" transitions as a function of component spins, exhibiting multiple branches and critical points not seen in single-hole metrics (Kagohashi et al., 2024).

6. Astrophysical and Observational Significance

The ISCO underpins the inner edge of cold thin accretion disks, sets the maximal orbital frequency for quasi-periodic oscillations in X-ray binaries, and governs the late inspiral and gravitational waveform cutoff in compact binary coalescence. In neutron star systems, identification of a QPO with the ISCO frequency yields nearly EOS-independent mass estimates when using "universal" relations (Luk et al., 2018).

Neglecting strong magnetic fields, oblateness, or multipolar deformations can systemically bias derived masses, spins, or disk inclination; e.g., omission of steep-field corrections leads to underestimation of neutron star mass by rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}210% when rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}3 T (Gutierrez-Ruiz et al., 2013). For rapidly rotating neutrons stars, ISCO appearance becomes non-monotonic with spin due to the competition between frame-dragging (drives ISCO inward) and quadrupolar distortion (pushes it outward), splitting the rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}4–spin plane into regimes with one or two possible ISCO-mass intervals (Torok et al., 2014).

ISCO properties can be measured by analysis of relativistically broadened Fe KrISCOr_{\rm ISCO}5 line profiles, especially using the rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}6-distribution method in lensed quasars, enabling constraints on rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}7, black hole spin, and disk inclination, with present sensitivity reaching rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}8 and rISCOr_{\rm ISCO}9 (Chartas et al., 2016).

7. Recent Advances: Dynamics, Finite-Mass, and Non-geodesic ISCOs

The ISCO concept extends to dynamical spacetimes (e.g., Vaidya, Kerr–Vaidya), utilizing either the effective potential or Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 00-variation method to track the time-dependent Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 01 as global parameters (mass, spin) evolve (Song, 2021). Nonradial (vertical) instabilities can move the last stable orbit outwards beyond the traditional ISCO in metrics deviating from Kerr, e.g., Johannsen–Psaltis deformations (Ono et al., 2016).

Finite-mass corrections, especially in the form of self-gravitating rings or thick disks, shift Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 02 inward and raise orbital frequency by terms Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 03, with Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 04 the ring/body-to-BH mass ratio (Hod, 2014). The region within the ISCO, traditionally regarded as dynamically unstable for circular orbits, admits analytic thermodynamic solutions describing non-circular, plunging flows in the adiabatic limit, with nontrivial temperature structure and possible photospheric maxima at Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 05 (Mummery et al., 2023).


Table: Summary of ISCO Key Results in Selected Spacetimes

System ISCO Radius (dimensionless) Distinctive ISCO physics
Schwarzschild Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 06 Benchmark, upper bound for 4D static BHs
Kerr (prograde) Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 07 (BPT formula) Inward shift Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 08 at Veff(rISCO)=1,Veff′(rISCO)=0,Veff′′(rISCO)=0V_{\rm eff}(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 1,\quad V_{\rm eff}'(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 0,\quad V_{\rm eff}''(r_{\rm ISCO}) = 09
PRS magnetized NS κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}0 Monotonic decrease with increasing κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}1
Kerr-MOG κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}2 Outwards shift proportional to modified gravity κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}3
Higher D (κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}4) Unbounded No upper bound (or no ISCO for κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}5)
Kerr-Taub-NUT κ2=−12grr∂2Veff∂r2∣rISCO,ν2=−12gθθ∂2Veff∂θ2∣rISCO,θ=π/2\kappa^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{rr}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial r^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO}},\quad \nu^2 = -\frac{1}{2g_{\theta\theta}}\frac{\partial^2 V_{\rm eff}}{\partial \theta^2}\Big|_{r_{\rm ISCO},\theta=\pi/2}6 Outward shift with NUT charge in non-extremal regime

This rich structure of ISCO physics establishes it as a diagnostic of strong-field gravity, electromagnetic and multipolar structure, compact object properties, and even beyond-GR phenomenology. Each deviation from standard ISCO predictions can point to additional fields, corrections to GR, or new astrophysical processes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
10.
ISCOs in AdS/CFT  (2020)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Innermost Stable Circular Orbits (ISCOs).