Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Projective Filling Geodesic Currents

Updated 12 January 2026
  • Projective filling geodesic currents are measures on geodesics in closed surfaces that intersect every essential curve, providing a foundation for advanced geometric analysis.
  • They extend Thurston’s metrics through both symmetrized and asymmetric entropy-type approaches, offering a complete framework for dynamical and rigidity phenomena.
  • Length-minimizing projections associated with these currents uniquely link hyperbolic metrics to geodesic distributions, underpinning effective counting and orbit distribution results.

A projective filling geodesic current is a structure encoding the distribution of geodesics on a closed surface of negative Euler characteristic, up to positive scaling, that transversely intersects every essential closed geodesic. The space of projective filling currents, denoted PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S), plays a central role in higher Teichmüller theory, dynamical systems, and the geometry of moduli spaces. This locus contains and compactifies Teichmüller space under the Liouville current embedding, carries natural extensions of the Thurston metrics, and admits canonical dynamical and rigidity structures far beyond geometric surface theory.

1. Geodesic Currents and Projectivization

A geodesic current on a closed oriented surface SS of genus g2g\ge 2 is a π1(S)\pi_1(S)-invariant Radon measure on the space GG of unoriented geodesics in the universal cover H2\mathbb{H}^2. The space C(S)\mathcal{C}(S) of all geodesic currents is a metrizable, topological vector space under the weak-* topology and has a natural scaling action by R>0\mathbb{R}_{>0}. A closed geodesic or a measured lamination induces a discrete or continuous geodesic current, and every hyperbolic metric XX yields its associated Liouville current LXL_X.

The projectivization PC(S)=(C(S){0})/R>0\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S) = (\mathcal{C}(S) \setminus \{0\})/\mathbb{R}_{>0} is compact, providing a natural analog to Thurston’s compactification of Teichmüller space by projective measured laminations.

A current μ\mu is filling if its support meets every geodesic, equivalently if i(μ,ν)>0i(\mu,\nu) > 0 for all nonzero ν\nu in C(S)\mathcal{C}(S), where i(,)i(\cdot,\cdot) is Bonahon's continuous, symmetric, bilinear intersection form extending the geometric intersection of closed curves. The projectivized subspace PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) of filling currents is open and dense in PC(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S) and is the maximal domain for which the natural extensions of hyperbolic geometry remain meaningful (Sapir, 2022, Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026).

2. Extended Thurston Metrics on Projective Filling Currents

Teichmüller space T(S)\mathcal{T}(S) embeds isometrically into PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) via X[LX]X \mapsto [L_X], with i(LX,α)=X(α)i(L_X,\alpha) = \ell_X(\alpha) the geodesic length function. The classical Thurston asymmetric metric on T(S)\mathcal{T}(S),

dTh(X,Y)=logsupαY(α)X(α),d_{\mathrm{Th}}(X,Y) = \log \sup_{\alpha} \frac{\ell_Y(\alpha)}{\ell_X(\alpha)},

admits two distinct extensions to the space of projective filling currents:

  • Symmetrized Thurston metric:

dTh([μ],[ν])=supλlogi(ν,λ)i(μ,λ)+supλlogi(μ,λ)i(ν,λ),d_{\mathrm{Th}}([\mu],[\nu]) = \sup_\lambda \log \frac{i(\nu,\lambda)}{i(\mu,\lambda)} + \sup_\lambda \log \frac{i(\mu,\lambda)}{i(\nu,\lambda)},

which is a complete, proper metric on PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) and restricts to the symmetrization of Thurston's metric on T(S)\mathcal{T}(S) (Sapir, 2022).

  • Asymmetric entropy-type metric:

d([μ],[ν])=log(supci(ν,c)i(μ,c)h(ν)h(μ)),d([\mu],[\nu]) = \log \left( \sup_c \frac{i(\nu,c)}{i(\mu,c)} \cdot \frac{h(\nu)}{h(\mu)} \right),

where h(μ)h(\mu) is the critical exponent, i.e., exponential growth rate of the counting function for i(μ,c)Ri(\mu,c)\le R over closed curves cc. This dd is an asymmetric metric and extends Thurston's asymmetric metric, satisfying d([LX],[LY])=dTh(X,Y)d([L_X],[L_Y]) = d_{\mathrm{Th}}(X,Y) (Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026, Sapir, 2022).

No quasi-isometric retraction from PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) to T(S)\mathcal{T}(S) exists for either metric (Sapir, 2022, Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026), in sharp contrast to the boundary behavior of the classical setting.

3. Length-Minimizing Projections and Rigidity

Given a projective filling current [μ][\mu], the length-minimizing projection

π:PCfill(S)T(S)\pi : \mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) \to \mathcal{T}(S)

is defined by

π([μ])=argminXT(S)i(μ,X).\pi([\mu]) = \operatorname{argmin}_{X \in \mathcal{T}(S)} i(\mu,X).

Here i(μ,X):=X(μ)i(\mu,X) := \ell_X(\mu) is the total μ\mu-length in the metric XX. This projection is continuous, proper, and equivariant with respect to the mapping class group (Hensel et al., 2021, Sapir, 2022, Sapir, 2022). The minimizer is unique due to strict convexity of Xi(μ,X)X \mapsto i(\mu,X) along Weil–Petersson geodesics.

Key properties include:

  • Fibers over points in T(S)\mathcal{T}(S) are compact, but their diameters in the Thurston metric can diverge in the thin parts.
  • For measured laminations λ1+λ2\lambda_1+\lambda_2 with filling support, the projection corresponds to the metric minimizing (λ1)+(λ2)\ell(\lambda_1)+\ell(\lambda_2) (Kerckhoff's line-of-minima).
  • As a filling current degenerates towards a uniquely ergodic lamination, its image under π\pi converges to the corresponding projective lamination in Thurston’s boundary.

Moreover, recent work shows that the horofunction compactification of (PCfill(S),d)(\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S), d) can be identified with the full space PC(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S), and isometric rigidity holds: surfaces of different genera do not yield isometric spaces (PCfill(S),d)(\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S), d) (Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026).

4. Dynamical and Asymptotic Aspects

The metric structures associated with projective filling currents yield deep counting results and entropy invariants. For a filling current μ\mu, the critical exponent δ(μ)\delta(\mu) is defined as

δ(μ)=lim supR1Rlog#{[c]:i(μ,c)R},\delta(\mu) = \limsup_{R\to\infty} \frac{1}{R} \log \#\{ [c] : i(\mu, c) \le R \},

which coincides with the exponential growth of intersections. For the Liouville current LXL_X of a hyperbolic surface XX, one has δ(LX)=1\delta(L_X) = 1 (Glorieux, 2017).

Scaling behaves as δ(tμ)=δ(μ)/t\delta(t\mu) = \delta(\mu)/t, so the critical exponent descends to a proper, continuous function on projective filling currents, serving as a natural entropy functional throughout PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S). This functional generalizes the volume entropy of a hyperbolic metric to the infinite-dimensional moduli space of projective filling currents, with minimizing points corresponding to hyperbolic metrics.

Furthermore, the metric dμd_\mu on the universal cover defined by

dμ(x,y)=μ(geodesics transversely intersecting [x,y])d_\mu(x, y) = \mu(\text{geodesics transversely intersecting } [x, y])

is a proper, π1(S)\pi_1(S)-invariant Gromov-hyperbolic distance if and only if μ\mu is filling, leading to highly nontrivial geometric and dynamical structures (Glorieux, 2017).

5. Counting, Orbit Distribution, and Measure Rigidity

Projective filling geodesic currents govern the asymptotic behavior of moduli space and mapping class group dynamics:

  • For any filling compactly supported current α\alpha and any positive, homogeneous, continuous functional ff, the number of mapping classes ϕ\phi with f(ϕ(α))Lf(\phi(\alpha)) \leq L grows as LdL^d as LL \to \infty, with d=dimPC(S)=6g6+2nd = \dim \mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S) = 6g-6+2n, and explicit constants in terms of Thurston measure on measured laminations (Rafi et al., 2017, Arana-Herrera, 2021).
  • For counting filling closed curve orbits of a given topological type under the mapping class group with respect to intersection with a filling current, a power-saving error term is achieved and the empirical measures on orbit representatives equidistribute in PC(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S) for large LL (Arana-Herrera, 2021).

The input of filling and projectivization is crucial: sublevel sets {f1}\{f \le 1\} are compact in PC(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}(S) due to homogeneity, and the filling property ensures positivity under intersection, disallowing degenerate or tangential behaviors.

6. Extensions and Broader Frameworks

The theory of projective filling geodesic currents admits broad generalizations:

  • The asymmetric metric dd on PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) extends to the space of metric structures on any nonelementary Gromov hyperbolic group, and further to hyperbolic potentials, capturing and generalizing the metric geometry of Hitchin representations, Anosov representations, and length-spectrum metrics (Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026).
  • This universality connects the geometry of currents on surfaces, higher representation spaces, and group-theoretic metric structures, identifying projective filling currents as the natural geometric boundary in a wide array of moduli problems.

7. Summary Table: Key Structures for Projective Filling Geodesic Currents

Concept Notation/Symbol Defining Property
Space of geodesic currents C(S)\mathcal{C}(S) π1(S)\pi_1(S)-invariant Radon measures on unoriented geodesics
Projectivized filling currents PCfill(S)\mathbb{P}\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{fill}}(S) Projectivization of currents intersecting every essential geodesic
Intersection pairing i(μ,ν)i(\mu,\nu) Continuous symmetric bilinear extension of geometric intersection
Symmetrized Thurston metric dTh([μ],[ν])d_{Th}([\mu],[\nu]) supλlogi(ν,λ)i(μ,λ)+supλlogi(μ,λ)i(ν,λ)\sup_\lambda \log\frac{i(\nu,\lambda)}{i(\mu,\lambda)}+\sup_\lambda\log\frac{i(\mu,\lambda)}{i(\nu,\lambda)}
Length-minimizing projection π([μ])\pi([\mu]) Unique XT(S)X\in\mathcal{T}(S) minimizing i(μ,X)i(\mu,X)
Critical exponent δ(μ)\delta(\mu) lim supR1Rlog#{[c]:i(μ,c)R}\limsup_{R\to\infty} \frac{1}{R}\log\#\{[c]:i(\mu,c)\le R\}

These structures provide a dense algebraic, metric, and dynamical framework for the geometry of surfaces, orbit statistics, and moduli problems beyond the setting of Teichmüller and measured lamination spaces.


References:

(Glorieux, 2017, Rafi et al., 2017, Arana-Herrera, 2021, Hensel et al., 2021, Sapir, 2022, Sapir, 2022, Jyothis et al., 5 Jan 2026)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Projective Filling Geodesic Currents.