Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Reentrant Topological Phase Transitions

Updated 28 January 2026
  • Reentrant topological phase transitions are sequences where systems repeatedly enter and exit distinct topological states as control parameters like disorder, chemical potential, or modulation are varied.
  • Analytical and numerical methods, including real-space winding numbers and Lyapunov exponents, precisely delineate phase boundaries and critical behavior.
  • Experimental platforms such as cold atom setups, photonic lattices, and superconducting chains validate the robust and universal nature of reentrant topological phenomena.

Reentrant topological phase transitions are sequences of phase transitions in which a system repeatedly enters and exits distinct topological phases as a function of a control parameter such as disorder strength, chemical potential, quasiperiodic modulation, or interaction strength. These transitions are characterized by the appearance, disappearance, and reappearance of topologically protected boundary modes (such as Majorana zero modes or edge states) and associated changes in bulk topological invariants. Reentrant behavior is particularly prominent in low-dimensional, disorder-prone, or periodically/quasiperiodically modulated systems, and has been realized in fermionic wires, superconducting chains, photonic and cold-atom analogues, and even in black hole thermodynamics in anti-de Sitter spacetimes.

1. Theoretical Framework and Model Prototypes

Reentrant topological transitions were first rigorously analyzed in models interpolating between prototypical topological classes, such as the Kitaev chain (1D class D topological superconductor with unpaired Majorana end modes) and the bond-alternating Haldane/SSH chain (1D class BDI/Solitary Polyacetylene). The canonical Hamiltonian for spinless fermions on an NN-site chain with bond alternation and pp-wave pairing is:

H=j=1N1[tjcjcj+1+Δcjcj+1+h.c.],tj=t[1+(1)jδ], δ[1,1]H = \sum_{j=1}^{N-1}\left[ -t_j c_j^\dagger c_{j+1} + \Delta c_j c_{j+1} + \text{h.c.} \right],\quad t_j = t\left[1 + (-1)^j \delta\right],\ \delta \in [-1,1]

The parameter Δ\Delta tunes the pp-wave pairing, while δ\delta modulates the bond alternation (Sugimoto et al., 2017). This model exhibits multiple topological phases diagnosed by:

  • Majorana number M=sgn{Pf[h(0)]Pf[h(π)]}\mathcal{M} = \mathrm{sgn}\{\mathrm{Pf}[h(0)]\,\mathrm{Pf}[h(\pi)]\}.
  • Bulk Berry phase or nonlocal string order parameter as in the Haldane limit.

Distinct topological sectors (M=±1\mathcal{M} = \pm 1) correspond to phases supporting Majorana zero modes or bulk string order, respectively. The phase boundaries are analytically given by Δ=±δ\Delta = \pm\delta and Δ=±1/δ\Delta = \pm 1/\delta, leading, for fixed δ\delta, to a sequence of M=1+11\mathcal{M}=-1 \to +1 \to -1 as Δ|\Delta| increases—a clear instance of reentrant topological phase transitions.

2. Quasiperiodicity, Disorder, and Reentrant Topological Anderson Insulators

Quasiperiodic modulation and disorder introduce further complexity, yielding reentrant topological Anderson insulator (TAI) phases and rich phase diagrams not captured by clean models:

  • In generalized SSH chains with quasi-periodic hopping,

H=m=1Lvm(cm,Bcm,A+h.c.)+m=1L1wm(cm+1,Acm,B+h.c.)H = \sum_{m=1}^{L} v_m (c_{m,B}^\dagger c_{m,A} + \text{h.c.}) + \sum_{m=1}^{L-1} w_m (c_{m+1,A}^\dagger c_{m,B} + \text{h.c.})

with vm=v+Δmv_m = v + \Delta_m, wm=w+γΔmw_m = w + \gamma\Delta_m, and Δm=Δcos(2πβm+ϕ)\Delta_m = \Delta\cos(2\pi\beta m + \phi), the competition between off-diagonal quasiperiodic modulations yields robust reentrant TAI and RTAI phases (Lu et al., 2023). These phases are detected by real-space winding number and the divergence or vanishing of the zero-mode localization length.

  • In the generalized SSH model with both bounded (b<1|b|<1) and unbounded (b1|b|\ge1) quasiperiodic modulation of the intracell hoppings,

t1,n=t1+λcos(2παn+θ)1bcos(2παn+θ)t_{1,n}^\prime = t_1 + \frac{\lambda \cos(2\pi\alpha n + \theta)}{1 - b\cos(2\pi\alpha n + \theta)}

the system exhibits two classes of re-entrant phase transitions: traditional TI → trivial → TAI (for bounded), and TAI1_1 → trivial → TAI2_2 (for unbounded) as λ\lambda is increased. All transitions are sharply identified via real-space winding number, Lyapunov exponent, and bulk gap closing (Wang et al., 2024).

  • In topological ladders and trimer lattices, reentrance manifests as the destruction, reformation, and sometimes reversal of quantized transport properties as disorder or modulation strength is swept (Banerjee et al., 6 Aug 2025, Wang et al., 20 Jan 2026).

3. Majorana Wires, Lattice Modulation, and Reentrant Phases

In 1D spin–orbit-coupled wires subject to magnetic fields and proximity-induced superconductivity, introducing periodic or quasiperiodic lattice modulation (via potential or hopping) fragments the spectrum into minibands. Each miniband can host topological superconducting (TS) phases with end Majorana fermions:

  • The number of topological regions ("windows") as a function of chemical potential or modulation amplitude increases with the fractal miniband structure induced by the modulation (Tezuka et al., 2012, Tezuka et al., 2013).
  • Modulation-induced reentrant transitions are robust to modulation-domain-wall phase jumps and persist under both onsite and hopping modulation.
  • Majorana zero modes appear and disappear multiple times as μ\mu is swept, resulting in a sequence of trivial and nontrivial TS phases (Tezuka et al., 2012, Tezuka et al., 2013).

For multi-channel spinless pp-wave superconductors, disorder induces an alternation of trivial and nontrivial phases, with the number of alternations equal to the channel number NN. The critical mean free paths for each transition are ln=ξ/(n+1)l_n = \xi/(n+1), where ξ\xi is the coherence length. The topological invariant QQ alternates (1)N(-1)^N, (1)N1(-1)^{N-1},... as ll crosses these thresholds (Rieder et al., 2013).

4. Moiré Modulation, Entanglement, and Universality

Extended SSH models with commensurate moiré modulations of intracell hopping realize reentrant topological transitions; analytic renormalization shows that the effective intracell coupling undergoes oscillatory crossings with the fixed intercell hopping, generating repeated 020\leftrightarrow 2 (and more complex) transitions in the winding number. In systems with next-nearest-neighbor ww, phase boundaries are computed as zeros of detq(k)\det q(k) in the reduced moiré Brillouin zone (Zhang et al., 15 Jan 2026).

These transitions exhibit remarkable consistency in bulk-boundary correspondence: the number of zero-energy edge modes, the entanglement spectrum degeneracies, the central charge extracted from CFT scaling of entanglement entropy (with c=ΔWc = \Delta W matching winding number jumps), and the critical exponents (e.g., Δc(L)Δc()L1|\Delta_c(L)-\Delta_c(\infty)| \propto L^{-1}) remain invariant across all reentrant topological transitions, suggesting a universal class (Zhang et al., 15 Jan 2026).

5. Non-Hermitian Lattices and Reentrant Topology

Non-Hermitian generalizations, such as the complexified Aubry–André–Harper model, display reentrant transitions driven by the Hermiticity-breaking parameter gg:

H=jt(cjcj+1+h.c.)+Vei(2παj+g)nj+Vei(2παjg)njH = \sum_j t (c_j^\dagger c_{j+1} + \text{h.c.}) + V e^{i(2\pi\alpha j + g)} n_j + V e^{-i(2\pi\alpha j - g)} n_j

The sequence of phases, as gg is increased, is:

  • Extended (IPR0\langle\mathrm{IPR}\rangle \to 0) \to Mixed (mobility edge, partial winding) \to Localized (IPR>0\langle\mathrm{IPR}\rangle > 0, full winding W=2W=2) \to Mixed \to Reentrant Extended (W=0W=0) (Padhan et al., 2023).

The topological content is captured by the spectral winding number W(εb)W(\varepsilon_b), which counts the encirclements of a base point in the complex energy plane and jumps as the system passes through reentrance.

6. Reentrant Transitions in Higher-dimensional and Gravitational Systems

In gravitational analogues, specifically in Born–Infeld–massive gravity and dRGT theories in topological Anti-de Sitter black holes, reentrant phase transitions (RPTs) appear in the extended black hole thermodynamics:

  • Equation of state P(r+,T)P(r_+,T) admits up to NN critical points for d4+Nd \ge 4 + N, allowing for NN-fold reentrant RPTs and triple points (Zhang et al., 2017, Dehghani et al., 2020).
  • As temperature is lowered at fixed pressure, the black hole entropy can reenter previously exited branches, characterized by jumps in the Gibbs free energy and supported by swallowtail diagrams in G(T)G(T). In higher dimensions, these RPTs are nontrivially richer than classical Van der Waals transitions and have no direct analogy in condensed-matter models.

7. Experimental Realizations and Physical Mechanism

Reentrant topological phases have been predicted and are feasible to observe in various platforms:

  • Cold atom systems with engineered SSH-like couplings, Aubry–André potentials, momentum-lattice engineering, and wavepacket dynamics enable direct measurement of winding numbers and localization-delocalization transitions (Lu et al., 2023, Wang et al., 2024, Banerjee et al., 6 Aug 2025).
  • Photonic waveguide arrays, modulated nanowires, and Rydberg-atom arrays with programmable hoppings support creation and readout of reentrant edge states (Wang et al., 2024, Wang et al., 20 Jan 2026).
  • In driven, active matter systems (topological flocks with nonreciprocal alignment), reentrant band formation is triggered by the emergence of instability windows as a function of noise and dissenter fraction (Tang et al., 2024).

The central mechanism of reentrance is the interplay of distinct localization/gapping mechanisms—band folding due to periodicity or disorder, emergent minibands and minigaps, or the oscillatory renormalization of effective Hamiltonian parameters. As control parameters are swept, the system successively fulfills then violates the topological gap-opening conditions, resulting in repeated entrance to and exit from topologically nontrivial states.


Selected Models and Their Reentrant Features

Model Type Key Feature Reference
Kitaev–Haldane Chain Bond alternation, U(1) symmetry drives M=1+11\mathcal{M}=-1\rightarrow+1\rightarrow-1 (Sugimoto et al., 2017)
Quasiperiodic SSH TAI–trivial–RTAI transitions, real-space winding (Lu et al., 2023, Wang et al., 2024)
1D Rashba Wire Band folding induces repeated TS windows (Tezuka et al., 2012, Tezuka et al., 2013)
Mosaic Trimer Lattice Disorder-induced reentrant topology (Wang et al., 20 Jan 2026)
Moiré Extended SSH Universality and entanglement across reentrances (Zhang et al., 15 Jan 2026)
Non-Hermitian AAH Spectral winding, deloc–loc–deloc (Padhan et al., 2023)
Multichannel pp-wave NN reentrant transitions via disorder (Rieder et al., 2013)
AdS Black Holes RPTs, triple points, NN-fold transitions (Zhang et al., 2017, Dehghani et al., 2020)
Topological Flocks Dual-band reentrant microphases (Tang et al., 2024)

Reentrant topological phase transitions thus represent a robust and universal phenomenon in diverse quantum and classical settings, deeply rooted in the interplay of symmetry, modulation, and disorder, and provide new platforms for engineering and studying topologically protected phenomena.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Reentrant Topological Phase Transitions.