Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Reverse Hölder Inequality

Updated 24 December 2025
  • Reverse Hölder Inequality is a foundational concept that defines conditions under which the mean of a function raised to a higher exponent is controlled by its mean at a smaller exponent.
  • It extends classical integral inequalities by incorporating sharp quantitative constants and self-improving properties in settings such as multilinear, Orlicz, and variable exponent frameworks.
  • Applications of the Reverse Hölder Inequality span operator theory, nonlinear PDE regularity, geometric rigidity, and probabilistic models, offering robust tools for integral and norm estimates.

The reverse Hölder inequality is a fundamental tool in harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, and probability, serving as a self-improving regularity principle for weighted integrability, nonlinear structures, and stochastic models. It quantifies when the mean of a function or a weight under a larger exponent is controlled by its mean under a smaller exponent—often in sharp quantitative form depending on structural constants or weight classes. The inequality, classical or generalized, often underpins higher integrability, dimension-free regularity, operator bounds, and geometric rigidity phenomena across analysis and geometry.

1. Classical and Weighted Reverse Hölder Inequalities

The most prevalent form asserts: if w0w \geq 0 is locally integrable on %%%%1%%%% and for s>1s > 1,

[w]RHs=supQ(1QQws)1/s(1QQw)1<,[w]_{RH_s} = \sup_Q \left(\frac{1}{|Q|} \int_Q w^s \right)^{1/s} \left(\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w \right)^{-1} < \infty,

then for every cube QQ,

(1QQws)1/sC1QQw.\left(\frac{1}{|Q|} \int_Q w^s \right)^{1/s} \leq C \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w.

This encapsulates the standard (linear) reverse Hölder property for weights, with CC depending on [w]RHs[w]_{RH_s} (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2017).

For Muckenhoupt classes ApA_p, 1<p<1 < p < \infty, one similarly has reverse Hölder self-improvement: there exists r>1r > 1 and CC depending on [w]Ap[w]_{A_p} so that

(1QQwr)1/rC1QQw.\left( \frac{1}{|Q|} \int_Q w^r \right)^{1/r} \leq C \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w.

In endpoint and limiting regimes, sharp constants and dependence on structural invariants (e.g., Fujii–Wilson or Wilson's AA_{\infty} constant) emerge (Ortiz-Caraballo et al., 2012, Parissis et al., 2016).

2. Sharp Quantitative Versions and Optimal Constants

Recent works have focused on optimal exponent improvements and sharp constants, essential for rigorous operator estimates and fine regularity. For AA_{\infty} weights in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, let

[w]A:=supQ1w(Q)QM(wχQ),[w]_{A_{\infty}} := \sup_Q \frac{1}{w(Q)} \int_Q M(w \chi_Q),

where MM is the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. Then for τn=2n+1\tau_n = 2^{n+1} and rw=1+1/(τn[w]A)r_w = 1 + 1 / (\tau_n [w]_{A_{\infty}}),

(1QQwrw)1/rw21QQw\left( \frac{1}{|Q|} \int_Q w^{r_w} \right)^{1/r_w} \leq 2 \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w

holds for all cubes QQ, and this exponent is optimal: for any (r,C)(r, C) such that the RHI holds, necessarily [w]AτnC(r1)1[w]_{A_{\infty}} \leq \tau_n C (r - 1)^{-1} (Ortiz-Caraballo et al., 2012).

For strong ApA_p^* weights measured by rectangles and general Radon measures,

1μ(R)Rw1+ϵdμ2(1μ(R)Rwdμ)1+ϵ\frac{1}{\mu(R)}\int_R w^{1+\epsilon} d\mu \leq 2 \left( \frac{1}{\mu(R)} \int_R w d\mu \right)^{1+\epsilon}

with 0<ϵ1/(2p+2[w]Ap1)0 < \epsilon \leq 1 / (2^{p+2}[w]_{A_p^*} - 1), and the constant $2$ is independent of the dimension (Luque et al., 2015).

For "flat" AA_\infty weights (Fujii–Wilson constant close to 1), the admissible exponent blows up as the constant approaches 1, interpolating between weighted and unweighted regimes: 1<r<1+12n(δ1),    C(w,r)=δr1r12n(δ1)withr=rr1,    (w)A<δ1 < r < 1 + \frac{1}{2^n(\delta-1)},\;\; C(w, r) = \delta \frac{r' - 1}{r' - 1 - 2^n(\delta - 1)} \quad \text{with} \quad r' = \frac{r}{r-1},\;\;(w)_{A_\infty} < \delta (Parissis et al., 2016).

3. Multilinear, Weak, Orlicz, and Variable Exponent Extensions

Reverse Hölder inequalities extend beyond classical LpL^p to:

  • Multilinear setting: If s1,,sm>1s_1, \ldots, s_m > 1, 1/si=1\sum 1/s_i = 1, and wiRHsiw_i \in RH_{s_i},

i=1m(1QQwisi)1/siCi=1m1QQwi\prod_{i=1}^m \left(\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w_i^{s_i}\right)^{1/s_i} \leq C \prod_{i=1}^m \frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w_i

which underpins factorization and norm bounds for multilinear maximal operators and weights (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2017).

  • Weak RHIs on metric measure spaces: For a weight ww on (X,d,μ)(X, d, \mu), ww satisfies a weak RHI if

(1μ(B)Bwpdμ)1/pC1μ(2B)2Bwdμ\left( \frac{1}{\mu(B)}\int_B w^p d\mu \right)^{1/p} \leq C \frac{1}{\mu(2B)} \int_{2B} w d\mu

with p>1,C>0p > 1, C > 0, allowing nondoubling weights and various characterizations equivalent to generalized (weak) AA_\infty properties (Kinnunen et al., 2021).

  • Orlicz scale: For Young functions Ψ\Psi,

[RHΨ]:=supQwΨ,QwQ<[RH_\Psi] := \sup_Q \frac{\|w\|_{\Psi, Q}}{\langle w \rangle_Q} < \infty

generalizes the classical reverse Hölder to non-power growth, enabling total extrapolation of operator bounds in the Orlicz scale (Anderson et al., 2016).

  • Variable exponent (p()p(\cdot)) and matrix weights: For wAp()w \in \mathcal{A}_{p(\cdot)}, there exists r>1r > 1,

Q1/(rpQ)wχQLrp()CQ1/pQwχQLp()|Q|^{-1/(r p_Q)} \|w \chi_Q\|_{L^{r p(\cdot)}} \leq C |Q|^{-1/p_Q} \|w \chi_Q\|_{L^{p(\cdot)}}

with explicit dependence of rr and CC on [w]Ap()[w]_{\mathcal{A}_{p(\cdot)}}, log-Hölder constants, and dimension (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2024).

4. Analytical, Geometric, and Probabilistic Generalizations

  • Nonlinear PDE regularity: The RHI for gradients is crucial for scalar solutions to degenerate parabolic equations, e.g., Trudinger’s equation. For u0u \ge 0, p2p \ge 2,

(Qr,rpup(1+ϵ))1/(p(1+ϵ))C(Q2r,(2r)pup)1/p(1+lower order terms)ϵ/p\left(\int_{Q_{r,r^p}} |\nabla u|^{p(1+\epsilon)} \right)^{1/(p(1+\epsilon))} \leq C \left(\int_{Q_{2r, (2r)^p}} |\nabla u|^p \right)^{1/p} (1 + \text{lower order terms})^{\epsilon/p}

with ϵ,C\epsilon, C depending only on dimension, pp, and structural constants (Saari et al., 2019).

  • Reverse Hölder for first Dirichlet Laplacian eigenfunctions: In RCD(K,N)(K,N) spaces, for $0 < p < q$,

uLq(Ω)zLqzLpuLp(Ω)\|u\|_{L^q(\Omega)} \geq \frac{\|z\|_{L^q}}{\|z\|_{L^p}} \|u\|_{L^p(\Omega)}

where zz is the comparator eigenfunction on the spherical suspension model, producing rigidity and stability consequences (Gunes et al., 2021).

  • Probabilistic versions: If (X,Y)(X, Y) are independent random vectors, e.g., uniformly distributed on pn\ell_p^n balls,

X,Y(mp,qε)XpYq\langle X, Y \rangle \geq (m_{p,q} - \varepsilon) \|X\|_p \|Y\|_q

holds with high probability for large nn, with explicit mp,qm_{p,q} given by Gamma functions, quantifying probabilistic reversals of Hölder's inequality (Frühwirth et al., 2022).

  • Kähler geometry: For Kähler metrics on Fano varieties or their singular analogues, under uniform Ricci potential bounds there is a reverse Hölder-type control for Darvas LpL^p Finsler metrics: dp(u,0)Ap,ne2R/pd1(u,0)+Bp,γeRd_p(u, 0) \leq A_{p, n} e^{2R/p} d_1(u, 0) + B_{p, \gamma} e^R with Ap,n,Bp,γA_{p, n}, B_{p, \gamma} universal (Berman, 2023).

5. Operator Theory, Self-Improvement, and Applications

Sharp reverse Hölder constants yield best-possible weighted norm inequalities for Calderón–Zygmund operators, their commutators, and maximal functions. For AA_\infty weights,

TfLp(w)Cp[w]AMfLp(w)\|Tf\|_{L^p(w)} \leq C p' [w]_{A_\infty} \|Mf\|_{L^p(w)}

and for Cp weights,

TfLp(w)[w]Cq(1+log+[w]Cq)MfLp(w),  wCq,q>p>1\|Tf\|_{L^p(w)} \lesssim [w]_{C_q}(1 + \log^+[w]_{C_q}) \|Mf\|_{L^p(w)},\; w \in C_q,\, q > p > 1

with logarithmic correction quantifying the sufficiency of Cp in Sawyer's theorem (Canto, 2018).

The reverse Hölder inequality is pivotal in the self-improvement of weight classes (ApA_p to RHsRH_s), factorization results for multilinear weights, the structure theorem for ApA_{\vec{p}} weights, and the streamlined sufficient conditions in two-weight norm inequalities for maximal operators (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2017).

6. Geometry of Extension, Weak and Non-Doubling Regimes

RHI extends to even extensions of functions and non-doubling measures. For f:R+R+f: \mathbb{R}_+ \to \mathbb{R}_+, one can bound

Rα,β(f~)21/αPα,β(f)R_{\alpha, \beta}(\tilde{f}) \leq 2^{1/\alpha} P_{\alpha, \beta}(f)

with Pα,βP_{\alpha, \beta} the best RHI constant on R+\mathbb{R}_+ and Rα,βR_{\alpha, \beta} its counterpart on R\mathbb{R}, achieving asymptotic sharpness as β\beta \to \infty (Shalukhina, 2018).

Weak RHIs characterize weak AA_\infty weights—generalizing Muckenhoupt’s AA_\infty to non-doubling and vanishing settings—with ten equivalent conditions spanning set-decay, log-bump, and BMO-pairing properties (Kinnunen et al., 2021).

7. Summary Table: Sharp Reverse Hölder Inequality Regimes

Weight Class or Setting RHI Form / Result Optimal Constant/Exponent
ApA_p (1<p<1 < p < \infty), cubes (1QQwr)1/rC1QQw\left(\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w^r\right)^{1/r} \leq C\frac{1}{|Q|}\int_Q w r11/[w]Apr - 1 \approx 1/[w]_{A_p}
AA_\infty, Wilson rw=1+1/(2n+1[w]A)r_w = 1 + 1/(2^{n+1}[w]_{A_\infty}) Factor $2$ (Ortiz-Caraballo et al., 2012)
Strong ApA_p^*, rectangles (1/μ(R))Rw1+ϵdμ2()(1/\mu(R))\int_R w^{1+\epsilon} d\mu \leq 2 (\dots) ϵ1/(2p+2[w]Ap)\epsilon \leq 1/(2^{p+2}[w]_{A_p^*})
Weak AA_\infty (1μ(B)Bwp)1/pC1μ(2B)2Bw\left( \frac{1}{\mu(B)}\int_B w^p \right)^{1/p} \leq C \frac{1}{\mu(2B)}\int_{2B} w p>1p > 1, CC via covering constants (Kinnunen et al., 2021)
Variable exponent Ap()\mathcal{A}_{p(\cdot)} Q1/(rpQ)wLrp()(Q)CQ1/pQwLp()(Q)|Q|^{-1/(r p_Q)}\|w\|_{L^{r p(\cdot)}(Q)} \leq C |Q|^{-1/p_Q} \|w\|_{L^{p(\cdot)}(Q)} Exponent, constant depend on [w]Ap()[w]_{\mathcal{A}_{p(\cdot)}} (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2024)

References

  • (Ortiz-Caraballo et al., 2012) Improving bounds for singular operators via Sharp Reverse Hölder Inequality for AA_{\infty}
  • (Luque et al., 2015) Reverse Hölder Property for strong weights and general measures
  • (Parissis et al., 2016) Asymptotically sharp reverse Hölder inequalities for flat Muckenhoupt weights
  • (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2017) A multilinear reverse Hölder inequality with applications to multilinear weighted norm inequalities
  • (Shalukhina, 2018) On the extension of the Reverse Hölder Inequality for power functions on the real axis
  • (Canto, 2018) Sharp reverse Hölder inequality for CpC_p weights and applications
  • (Saari et al., 2019) A reverse Hölder inequality for the gradient of solutions to Trudinger's equation
  • (Kinnunen et al., 2021) Characterizations of weak reverse Hölder inequalities on metric measure spaces
  • (Frühwirth et al., 2022) Hölder's inequality and its reverse-a probabilistic point of view
  • (Berman, 2023) Reverse Hölder inequalities on the space of Kähler metrics of a Fano variety and effective openness
  • (Cruz-Uribe et al., 2024) The reverse Hölder inequality for Ap()\mathcal{A}_{p(\cdot)} weights with applications to matrix weights

The reverse Hölder inequality constitutes both a deep structural regularity principle and a central constructive device for sharp bounds and rigidity in weight theory, geometric analysis, PDE regularity, and operator theory, with extensive ramifications in quantitative estimates and self-improvement phenomena.

Topic to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Reverse Hölder Inequality.