Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Shalika Models for GL(2n) Representations

Updated 1 January 2026
  • Shalika models are specialized automorphic representations for GL(2n) defined via a subgroup combining diagonal and unipotent elements, exhibiting a unique (multiplicity one) property.
  • They play a central role in the study of exterior-square L-functions and functoriality by linking the analytic behavior of L-functions to periods and automorphic lifts.
  • Their stability under parabolic induction and explicit construction in local and global settings provide a foundation for developing p-adic L-functions and advancing arithmetic geometry.

A Shalika model is a special kind of automorphic or local model for representations of general linear groups, defined via equivariance with respect to the "Shalika subgroup"—a non-reductive subgroup combining diagonal and unipotent structures—and a character that is typically a product of a Hecke or central character and an additive character. Shalika models play a key role in the theory of automorphic LL-functions, the classification of representations, and the geometry of eigenvarieties, and are linked to periods, multiplicity one theorems, functoriality, and arithmeticity. Their local and global theory is well-developed for GL2n\mathrm{GL}_{2n}, but generalizations also exist for metaplectic and other classical groups, as well as for unitary and symplectic groups.

1. Definition and Uniqueness of Shalika Models

Let G=GL2nG = \mathrm{GL}_{2n} over a local or global field FF. The Shalika subgroup SS is given by

S={(hX 0h):hGLn,XMn}G.S = \left\{ \begin{pmatrix} h & X \ 0 & h \end{pmatrix} \,:\, h \in \mathrm{GL}_n, X \in M_n \right\} \subset G.

Given a pair of characters (η,ψ)(\eta, \psi) on F×F^\times and FF, define the character on SS by

χS((hX 0h))=η(deth)ψ(trX).\chi_S\left( \begin{pmatrix} h & X \ 0 & h \end{pmatrix} \right) = \eta(\det h) \psi(\mathrm{tr} X).

A (local or global) representation π\pi of GG admits a Shalika model if there exists a nonzero linear form \ell (termed Shalika functional) on π\pi such that for all sSs \in S, (π(s)v)=χS(s)(v)\ell( \pi(s) v ) = \chi_S(s) \ell(v). Equivalently, there is an equivariant embedding

πIndSG(χS).\pi \hookrightarrow \operatorname{Ind}_S^G\,(\chi_S).

For automorphic representations, the global Shalika period is given by

Λψ(φ)(g)=ZG(A)S(F)\S(A)φ(sg)η1(s)ψ1(s)ds.\Lambda_\psi(\varphi)(g) = \int_{Z_G(\mathbb{A}) S(F) \backslash S(\mathbb{A})} \varphi(sg)\eta^{-1}(s)\psi^{-1}(s)\,ds.

Shalika functionals are unique up to scalars (multiplicity one) in both local and global settings, provided the character is "generic"—this is a consequence of the Gelfand–Kazhdan method, Bruhat—Tits theory, and, for generalizations, Harish–Chandra descent and relative trace formula arguments (Chen et al., 2017, Naor, 2022, Cauchi et al., 2023).

2. Characterization via LL-functions and Functoriality

A core result characterizes the existence of a Shalika model for a cuspidal automorphic representation π\pi of GL2n(A)\mathrm{GL}_{2n}(\mathbb{A}) in terms of the exterior-square LL-function: π admits a Shalika model    LS(s,π,2η1) has a simple pole at s=1.\pi \text{ admits a Shalika model} \iff L^S(s, \pi, \wedge^2 \otimes \eta^{-1}) \text{ has a simple pole at } s=1. This reflects that such π\pi are exactly those arising as functorial lifts from generic, globally generic, automorphic representations on GSpin2n+1_{2n+1} or (in the split case) SO2n+1_{2n+1} (Grobner et al., 2011, Gehrmann, 2015). The local analogue relates the local exterior-square LL-factor: for generic πv\pi_v, nonvanishing of the Shalika period is equivalent to a simple pole of L(s,πv,2)L(s, \pi_v, \wedge^2) at s=0s=0 (Matringe, 2015, Matringe, 2012, Beuzart-Plessis et al., 2018).

3. Structure Theory: Parabolic Induction, Multiplicity One, and Classification

Shalika models are stable under normalized parabolic induction: if π1\pi_1 and π2\pi_2 admit Shalika functionals, so does their induced product to GL(n1+n2)\mathrm{GL}(n_1+n_2), and the dimension of Hom spaces stays at most one (Matringe, 2015, Naor, 2022). Consequently, generic irreducible representations of GL2n\mathrm{GL}_{2n} admitting a Shalika model are classified as those of the form

π(Δ1×Δ1)××(Δs×Δs)×Δs+1××Δt,\pi \cong (\Delta_1 \times \Delta_1^\vee) \times \cdots \times (\Delta_s \times \Delta_s^\vee) \times \Delta_{s+1} \times \cdots \times \Delta_t,

where the Δi\Delta_i are discrete series or (for i>si > s) themselves admit Shalika models.

The connection to distinction problems is via periods: if π\pi is distinguished by H=GLn×GLnH = \mathrm{GL}_n \times \mathrm{GL}_n, i.e., has a linear period (invariant under HH), then under suitable integrability/square-integrability conditions, it also has a Shalika model (Matringe, 2012).

4. Explicit Constructions: Newforms, Test Vectors, and Zeta Integrals

Shalika newforms generalize the notion of local (newform) vectors in Whittaker models. For a generic irreducible representation over a non-archimedean local field, Jacquet–Piatetski–Shapiro–Shalika define a compact open subgroup KK with the fixed vector space VKV^K one-dimensional, and the (canonically normalized) Shalika newform JnewJ^{\mathrm{new}} (Okazaki, 2024). Okazaki provides a method to compute the values and support of Shalika newforms on the mirabolic subgroup, using combinatorics of double cosets, Gauss sums, and integral formulas. For ramified twisting characters, there exists an alternative "identity-nonvanishing" Shalika form JTJ_T playing the role of a true newform and realizing the full LL-factor and root number through the associated local zeta integrals.

For pp-adic analytic families and eigenvarieties, Shalika refinements (choices of eigenvectors in the local Shalika models with well-controlled Hecke eigenvalues) are key to the construction of pp-adic LL-functions (Salazar et al., 2022, Salazar et al., 2021, Dimitrov et al., 11 Aug 2025). The Friedberg–Jacquet local zeta integral,

$\zeta_v(s+\tfrac12, W_v, \chi_v) = \int_{\GL_n(F_v)} W_v\left( \begin{pmatrix} h & 0 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \right)\chi_v(\det h) |\det h|^{s-\tfrac12}\,dh,$

with suitable test vectors, interpolates the local LL-factors and is especially important at ramified and parahoric or Iwahori level.

5. Shalika Models and pp-adic LL-Functions in Families

Shalika models provide the structural input for the construction of multi-variable pp-adic LL-functions—functions varying over eigenvarieties and weight spaces—which interpolate critical values of standard LL-functions for families of automorphic representations. The main method involves pp-adic interpolation of classical evaluation functionals, attached to branching laws for GLn×GLn\mathrm{GL}_n \times \mathrm{GL}_n inside GL2n\mathrm{GL}_{2n} and overconvergent cohomology (Salazar et al., 2022, Salazar et al., 2021, Dimitrov et al., 11 Aug 2025, Gehrmann, 2015).

The key results are as follows:

  • For regular algebraic, symplectic-type cuspidal π\pi (i.e., essentially self-dual with symplectic twist), the eigenvariety is étale at classical points with non-critical Shalika refinements, and there is a Zariski-dense set of such points (Shalika families).
  • The resulting pp-adic LL-functions interpolate classical special values (critical L(πyχ,j+12)L(\pi_y\otimes\chi, j+\tfrac12), up to explicit periods and pp-adic Euler factors), and the analytic continuation to families rigorously mirrors the branching at Shalika points.
  • Admissibility, slope bounds, and the uniqueness of these Shalika functionals are crucial in guaranteeing the growth, control, and arithmeticity of the constructed pp-adic measures and their interpolation properties.

6. Generalizations, Metaplectic Variants, and Connections

Generalized Shalika models exist for groups G=GLn+mG = \mathrm{GL}_{n+m}, with subgroup Hn,mH_{n,m} defined by a block structure, and the associated induced models are multiplicity-free (Naor, 2022). Metaplectic Shalika models (for double covers of GL2n_{2n}) are constructed by embedding the classical definition into the metaplectic context, yielding multiplicity one, explicit (Casselman–Shalika type) formulas, and new Godement–Jacquet style integral representations for LL-value quotients (e.g., Sym2/2\mathrm{Sym}^2/\wedge^2) (Kaplan et al., 2016).

For groups of similitude or other classical types, Shalika models are also defined (e.g., for PGU2,2\mathrm{PGU}_{2,2}, where the model is characterized and realized via the theta correspondence, and a Casselman–Shalika formula is proven in terms of representations of the dual group of PGSp4\mathrm{PGSp}_4) (Cauchi et al., 2023).

Connections to the geometry of eigenvarieties and Galois representations crucially use the existence, uniqueness, and analytic family structure of Shalika models, forming a bridge between analytic, representation-theoretic, and arithmetic aspects of automorphic forms.

7. Arithmeticity and Periods

Shalika models can be equipped with rational structures relating automorphic forms and (cohomological) Galois representations. For cohomological cuspidal automorphic representations Π\Pi of GL2n(A)\mathrm{GL}_{2n}(\mathbb{A}), a comparison of rational structures leads to canonical periods ωϵ(Πf)\omega^\epsilon(\Pi_f), whose behavior under twisting matches the predictions for periods in Deligne's and Gross's conjectures. Explicit algebraicity and non-vanishing results for critical LL-values, Rankin–Selberg, and symmetric cube LL-functions for Hilbert modular and Siegel modular forms have been established via Shalika models (Grobner et al., 2011).

The construction of pp-adic LL-functions in families, including their interpolation properties, exceptional zero behavior, and explicit formulae in canonical cases, is fundamentally tied to the arithmetic and analytic qualities of the Shalika model and its associated periods (Gehrmann, 2015, Salazar et al., 2022, Salazar et al., 2021, Dimitrov et al., 11 Aug 2025).


Selected Principal References:

Paper Title arXiv ID Main Contribution
"Shalika newforms for GL(n)" (Okazaki, 2024) Structure, uniqueness, newforms, explicit formulas
"Shalika periods and parabolic induction for GL(n)" (Matringe, 2015) Induction, classification, LL-factor link
"On the arithmetic of Shalika models and the critical values of LL" (Grobner et al., 2011) Arithmeticity, periods, algebraicity of critical values
"On Shalika models and p-adic L-Functions" (Gehrmann, 2015) pp-adic LL-functions via modular symbols, Shalika interpolation
"Shalika models for general linear groups" (Naor, 2022) Multiplicity one, generalizations to GLn+m_{n+m}
"A Local Trace Formula for the Generalized Shalika Model" (Beuzart-Plessis et al., 2018) Trace formula, multiplicity on packets, link to LL-functions
"On pp-adic LL-functions for GL2nGL_{2n} Shalika families" (Salazar et al., 2021) Eigenvarieties, pp-adic LL-functions, geometric density
"On the GL(2n) eigenvariety: ... Shalika families and pp-adic LL" (Salazar et al., 2022) Shalika refinements, multivariable pp-adic LL-functions
"Parahoric level pp-adic LL-functions for ... Shalika models" (Dimitrov et al., 11 Aug 2025) Parahoric Shalika theory, refined local-global correspondences

These sources collectively form the modern theory of Shalika models and their applications across arithmetic, representation theory, and automorphic forms.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Shalika Models.