Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Weighted Roman Domination Number

Updated 3 January 2026
  • Weighted Roman domination number is a graph invariant that generalizes traditional Roman domination to weighted graphs by assigning values from {0,1,2} while satisfying domination constraints.
  • It establishes tight bounds in relation to the weighted domination number, with key equality cases observed in complete graphs, stars, and specific circulant weight patterns.
  • Its duality with the weighted differential not only offers new insights in extremal graph theory but also facilitates modeling of biomolecular structures by reflecting critical vertex attributes.

The weighted Roman domination number generalizes the classical Roman domination number to weighted graphs, assigning a positive real weight to each vertex. The parameter measures the minimum total weighted cost of a function that assigns values from {0,1,2}\{0,1,2\} to vertices—subject to domination constraints inspired by the strategic placement of Roman legions on a network—while accounting for vertex weights. This concept extends and refines domination invariants in graph theory and finds natural applications in the modeling of biomolecular structures, where vertex weights reflect biologically meaningful attributes.

1. Formal Definitions and Key Parameters

Let (G;w)(G; w) denote a vertex-weighted graph where G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a finite simple undirected graph and w:VR>0w:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{>0} assigns a strictly positive real weight to each vertex. The weight of a subset SVS\subseteq V is w(S)=vSw(v)w(S)=\sum_{v\in S}w(v), and the total weight is w(G)=w(V)w(G)=w(V).

A weighted dominating set DVD\subseteq V satisfies the property that every vertex uVDu\in V\setminus D has at least one neighbor in DD. The weighted domination number is defined as

γw(G)=min{w(D):DV and D dominates G}.\gamma_w(G) = \min\{w(D): D\subseteq V \text{ and } D \text{ dominates } G\}.

A weighted Roman dominating function (wRDF) f:V{0,1,2}f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2\} satisfies that for every vertex uu with f(u)=0f(u) = 0, there exists a neighbor vN(u)v\in N(u) with f(v)=2f(v)=2. The weight of ff is f(V)=uVf(u)w(u)f(V) = \sum_{u\in V}f(u)w(u). The weighted Roman domination number is

γwR(G)=min{f(V):f is a wRDF on (G;w)}.\gamma_{wR}(G) = \min\{f(V): f \text{ is a wRDF on } (G;w)\}.

For weighted degree, dw(v)=w(N(v))/w(v)d_w(v) = w(N(v))/w(v), where N(v)N(v) is the open neighborhood of vv; the extremal weighted degrees are Δw=maxvVdw(v)\Delta_w = \max_{v\in V}d_w(v) and δw=minvVdw(v)\delta_w = \min_{v\in V}d_w(v). For SVS \subseteq V, let B(S)={xVS:x has a neighbor in S}B(S) = \{x \in V\setminus S: x \text{ has a neighbor in } S\}. The weighted differential of SS is

(S)=w(B(S))w(S),\partial(S) = w(B(S)) - w(S),

and the differential of (G;w)(G; w) is (G)=maxSV(S)\partial(G) = \max_{S\subseteq V}\partial(S) (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

2. Principal Bounds and Extremal Structures

Several foundational inequalities are established for γwR(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) in relation to γw(G)\gamma_w(G):

  • Domination–Roman Sandwich Theorem: For every (G;w)(G;w),

γw(G)γwR(G)2γw(G)\gamma_w(G) \le \gamma_{wR}(G) \le 2\gamma_w(G)

The lower bound arises since any wRDF's support on {1,2}\{1,2\} is a dominating set, while the upper bound is realized by labeling a γw\gamma_w-set with $2$ and others with $0$ (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

  • Sharpness Conditions:
    • γwR(G)=γw(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) = \gamma_w(G) if and only if GG is edgeless.
    • γwR(G)=2γw(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) = 2\gamma_w(G) for complete graphs or graphs where a γw\gamma_w-set is a distance 3\ge 3 set.
  • Weighted Δ\Delta-Bound:

γwR(G)2w(G)Δw+1\gamma_{wR}(G) \ge \left\lceil \frac{2w(G)}{\Delta_w + 1} \right\rceil

This bound is tight for weighted star graphs configured to equate the center’s weighted degree with Δw\Delta_w.

  • Trivial Weight Upper Bound:

γwR(G)w(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) \le w(G)

with equality if and only if every component is an isolated vertex or an isolated edge {x,y}\{x, y\} with w(x)=w(y)w(x)=w(y).

  • Nordhaus–Gaddum Type Inequality: If GG and its complement G\overline{G} are nontrivial on n3n \ge 3 vertices,

4minvw(v)γwR(G)+γwR(G)<w(G)+w(G)4 \min_{v} w(v) \leq \gamma_{wR}(G) + \gamma_{wR}(\overline{G}) < w(G) + w(\overline{G})

3. Exact Values for Standard Graph Classes

Exact formulas are obtained for γwR(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) in several canonical graph families:

Graph Family γwR(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) Notes
Complete Graph (Kn;w)(K_n; w) 2minvw(v)2 \min_{v}w(v) Holds for all nn (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025)
Star (K1,t;w)(K_{1,t}; w) min{2w(x1),w(y1)+w(Y)}\min\{2w(x_1),\, w(y_1) + w(Y)\} x1x_1 is the center; YY is the leaf set
General Ks,t;wK_{s,t}; w, s2s \ge 2 min{w(x1)+w(X),w(y1)+w(Y),2[w(x1)+w(y1)]}\min\{w(x_1)+w(X),\, w(y_1)+w(Y),\, 2[w(x_1)+w(y_1)]\} X,YX, Y color classes ordered by weights
Cycle (Cn;w)(C_n; w) (1k/n)w(Cn)\leq (1 - k/n)w(C_n), k=n/3k = \lfloor n/3 \rfloor Equality if ww is constant, n=3k+n=3k+\ell, =1,2\ell=1,2

For nonuniform weights or nn divisible by $3$, various circulant weight patterns realize the tight upper bound, as the associated linear system admits infinitely many solutions (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

4. Realizability and Extremal Constructions

The extremal realizations corresponding to the established bounds are structurally characterized:

  • Equality γwR=2γw\gamma_{wR}=2\gamma_w is achieved in complete graphs and graphs where a γw\gamma_w-set is isolated at distance at least $3$.
  • Equality γwR=2w(G)/(Δw+1)\gamma_{wR} = \lceil 2 w(G)/(\Delta_w + 1)\rceil is realized by specifically weighted stars with the central vertex’s weighted degree matching Δw\Delta_w.
  • Equality γwR=w(G)\gamma_{wR} = w(G) holds only for graphs where each connected component is either an isolated vertex or an isolated edge with balanced weights (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

5. Equivalence with the Weighted Differential

A central result demonstrates that the weighted Roman domination number is dual to the graph’s maximal weighted differential: γwR(G)=w(G)(G)\gamma_{wR}(G) = w(G) - \partial(G) where (G)=maxSV[w(B(S))w(S)]\partial(G) = \max_{S\subseteq V}[w(B(S)) - w(S)]. For an optimal wRDF ff with V2=SV_2 = S, the vertices labeled $2$ correspond to SS, those labeled $0$ correspond to B(S)B(S), and those labeled $1$ to V(SB(S))V\setminus (S \cup B(S)). The construction yields f(V)=w(G)[w(B(S))w(S)]w(G)(G)f(V) = w(G) - \left[w(B(S)) - w(S)\right] \ge w(G) - \partial(G), while a set SS^* achieving (G)\partial(G) immediately induces a wRDF of weight w(G)(G)w(G) - \partial(G). This one-to-one correspondence underpins applications in extremal combinatorics and duality theory in domination (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

6. Applications and Significance

Weighted Roman domination numbers extend traditional domination parameters to encompass weighted models, providing greater flexibility for applications requiring variable importance of vertices—such as the modeling of biomolecular structures in bioinformatics, where vertex weights encode structural or functional information. This weighted framework is essential for accurate representation and optimization in biological and computational settings, offering sharper and more relevant bounds than unweighted analogues.

The equivalence between weighted Roman domination and the weighted differential links the parameter to maximization problems over reweighted neighborhoods, opening avenues for duality theory and extremal analysis in discrete mathematics and algorithmic graph theory (Cera et al., 27 Dec 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Weighted Roman Domination Number.