Connection between Frobenius-defined “open” elements and openness of the range map
Determine the precise connection between Cockett–Guo–Hofstra’s characterization of restriction categories admitting a range category structure via “open” elements defined by the Frobenius condition (as in Proposition 2.13 of Cockett–Guo–Hofstra) and the conditions established in this paper whereby a preBoolean range semigroup yields a topological category whose range map r is open (Proposition 8.10) and compact slices form a Boolean range semigroup (Proposition 7.9(1)). In particular, clarify how the Frobenius-based notion of openness for elements in a restriction semigroup relates to, or is equivalent to, the openness of the range map r in the associated étale or ample topological category, thereby characterizing precisely when a restriction semigroup admits a compatible coEhresmann (cosupport) operation.
References
In [12, Proposition 2.13] restriction categories which admit the structure of a range category are characterized, which implies that restriction semigroups which admit a compatible coEhresmann structure are precisely those all whose elements are open in the sense of [12]. This notion is defined by means of the Frobenius condition and resembles the definition of an open locale map. Our Proposition 8.10 and Proposition 7.9(1) are somewhat parallel to this, but involve openness of the range map r of a topological category. The precise connection between the two approaches needs further investigation.