Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimized measurement-free and fault-tolerant quantum error correction for neutral atoms

Published 17 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.11663v2)

Abstract: A major challenge in performing quantum error correction (QEC) is implementing reliable measurements and conditional feed-forward operations. In quantum computing platforms supporting unconditional qubit resets, or a constant supply of fresh qubits, alternative schemes which do not require measurements are possible. In such schemes, the error correction is realized via crafted coherent quantum feedback. We propose implementations of small measurement-free QEC schemes, which are fault-tolerant to circuit-level noise. These implementations are guided by several heuristics to achieve fault-tolerance: redundant syndrome information is extracted, and additional single-shot flag qubits are used. By carefully designing the circuit, the additional overhead of these measurement-free schemes is moderate compared to their conventional measurement-and-feed-forward counterparts. We highlight how this alternative approach paves the way towards implementing resource-efficient measurement-free QEC on neutral-atom arrays.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 307 (2015), 1302.3428 .
  2. E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation, Nature 549, 172 (2017), 1612.07330 .
  3. Google Quantum AI, Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction, Nature 595, 383 (2021).
  4. Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature 614, 676 (2023).
  5. S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and M. Cetina, Comparing Shor and Steane error correction using the Bacon-Shor code (2023), arXiv:2312.10851 .
  6. G. A. Paz-Silva, G. K. Brennen, and J. Twamley, Fault tolerance with noisy and slow measurements and preparation, Physical Review Letters 105, 100501 (2010).
  7. D. Crow, R. Joynt, and M. Saffman, Improved error thresholds for measurement-free error correction, Physical Review Letters 117, 130503 (2016).
  8. S. Heußen, D. F. Locher, and M. Müller, Measurement-free fault-tolerant quantum error correction in near-term devices, PRX Quantum 5, 010333 (2024).
  9. D. Bacon, Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012340 (2006).
  10. P. Aliferis and A. W. Cross, Subsystem fault tolerance with the Bacon-Shor code, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220502 (2007).
  11. P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
  12. S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9811052 .
  13. A. M. Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996a).
  14. H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Topological quantum distillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180501 (2006).
  15. C. Chamberland and M. E. Beverland, Flag fault-tolerant error correction with arbitrary distance codes, Quantum 2, 53 (2018).
  16. R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Flag fault-tolerant error correction for any stabilizer code, PRX Quantum 1, 010302 (2020).
  17. R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Quantum error correction with only two extra qubits, Physical Review Letters 121, 050502 (2018).
  18. P. Prabhu and B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant syndrome extraction and cat state preparation with fewer qubits, Quantum 7, 1154 (2023).
  19. In a controlled unitary, we define a one-control as the qubit that leads to the application of the unitary if the control is in |1⟩ket1\mathinner{|{1}\rangle}| 1 ⟩. These are illustrated in the diagrams with a filled circle.
  20. A. R. Calderbank and P. W. Shor, Good quantum error-correcting codes exist, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1098 (1996).
  21. A. Steane, Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 452, 2551 (1996b).
  22. Cirq Developers, Cirq, Zenodo [Online] (2023).
  23. This corresponds to a Haar-uniform sampling over initial logical states.
  24. P.-H. Liou and C.-Y. Lai, Parallel syndrome extraction with shared flag qubits for Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes of distance three, Physical Review A 107, 022614 (2023).
  25. We note that the thresholds claimed are for a single logical basis state different than |i⟩Lsubscriptket𝑖𝐿\mathinner{|{i}\rangle}_{L}start_ATOM | italic_i ⟩ end_ATOM start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which in our simulations lowers the logical performance.
  26. M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, Efficient error models for fault-tolerant architectures and the Pauli twirling approximation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012314 (2013).
  27. H. Bombín, Single-shot fault-tolerant quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031043 (2015).
  28. T. J. Yoder, R. Takagi, and I. L. Chuang, Universal fault-tolerant gates on concatenated stabilizer codes, Physical Review X 6, 031039 (2016).
  29. A. Paetznick and B. W. Reichardt, Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation with only transversal gates and error correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090505 (2013).
  30. T. Jochym-O’Connor and R. Laflamme, Using concatenated quantum codes for universal fault-tolerant quantum gates, Physical Review Letters 112, 010505 (2014).
  31. C. Chamberland, T. Jochym-O’Connor, and R. Laflamme, Overhead analysis of universal concatenated quantum codes, Physical Review A 95, 022313 (2017).
  32. H. Goto, Y. Ho, and T. Kanao, Measurement-free fault-tolerant logical zero-state encoding of the distance-three nine-qubit surface code in a one-dimensional qubit array, Physical Review Research 5, 043137 (2023).
  33. Y. Tomita and K. M. Svore, Low-distance surface codes under realistic quantum noise, Physical Review A 90, 062320 (2014).
  34. S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two- and three-qubit gates for Rydberg atoms, Quantum 6, 712 (2022).
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an optimized measurement-free QEC scheme that uses redundant syndrome extraction and single-shot flag qubits to bypass traditional measurements.
  • It demonstrates that eliminating measurement delays in neutral atom systems improves fault tolerance and minimizes error propagation in low-distance codes.
  • Performance analysis under depolarizing noise shows that the proposed approach effectively rivals conventional feed-forward error correction protocols.

Optimized Measurement-Free and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction for Neutral Atoms

The paper "Optimized Measurement-Free and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction for Neutral Atoms" (2404.11663) investigates the development of measurement-free quantum error correction (QEC) schemes tailored for neutral atom platforms. The research focuses on establishing fault-tolerant quantum circuits that operate without traditional measurement operations, which is particularly advantageous for architectures where measurements are time-consuming or technically challenging.

Introduction and Motivation

Quantum error correction is essential for maintaining coherence in quantum information processing. Conventional QEC strategies involve periodic measurement and correction based on classical feedback. However, the slow nature of measurements in some quantum computing platforms, such as neutral-atom arrays, poses a significant bottleneck. In this context, measurement-free QEC schemes that use coherent feedback without intermediate measurements present an attractive alternative.

Neutral atom platforms offer promising prospects for scalable quantum computation due to their long coherence times and ability to support high-fidelity gates through Rydberg interactions. Nonetheless, the disparity between operation and measurement times necessitates innovative approaches to QEC that can circumvent the limitations of current measurement methodologies.

Proposed Methodology

The core innovation of this research lies in the design of small, measurement-free QEC schemes that integrate fault-tolerance against circuit-level noise. The approach employs redundant syndrome extraction along with single-shot flag qubits to maintain fault-tolerance without measurements. This strategy is particularly beneficial for systems with inherent support for qubit resets or continuous supply of ancillary qubits. The key elements of the proposed circuit design include:

  1. Syndrome Redundancy: The extraction of an over-complete set of stabilizers provides additional syndrome information, which enhances error correction by preventing the propagation of errors to logical qubits.
  2. Single-Shot Flags: Additional qubits are used as flag qubits that detect and localize errors without the need for repeating syndrome extraction processes. This use of flag qubits in a single-shot manner allows immediate correction of detected errors. Figure 1

    Figure 1: Measurement-free fault-tolerant QEC implementation for the Bacon-Shor code. It reads out stabilizers using coherent quantum feedback.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2: Logical vs. physical error rate of our protocols for the Bacon-Shor code under a simplified noise model.

Implementation Details

The paper outlines strategies for implementing QEC circuits using low-distance codes such as the Bacon-Shor code and Steane's code. The Bacon-Shor code is analyzed for its compatibility with subsystem codes and gauge freedom, allowing for fault-tolerant syndrome extraction that can correct any detectable errors with minimal overhead.

The circuits are designed following specific heuristics to minimize the qubit and gate overhead while ensuring that fault-tolerance is preserved. Redundant syndrome measurements enable the prevention of error propagation, which is vital for the fault-tolerant performance of quantum computations.

Performance Analysis

The performance of the proposed measurement-free QEC schemes is benchmarked against conventional feed-forward error correction protocols. Simulations are conducted under scenarios of depolarizing noise and noise models specific to neutral atom arrays. The results indicate that the measurement-free approach effectively competes with feed-forward schemes, particularly in systems where measurement-induced idling is prohibitively costly.

Conclusion

The research offers a significant step towards implementing practical, measurement-free QEC in neutral atom quantum computers. By efficiently utilizing hardware resources, such as native multi-qubit gates and reconfigurable atom arrays, the proposed circuits highlight the potential for reduced operational overhead in QEC.

The findings suggest that measurement-free QEC protocols could evolve to handle larger circuits and more complex error models, given further advancements in hardware capabilities. Future research directions may explore the integration of these approaches with universal gate sets and further development on managing multi-error scenarios in larger-scale quantum computations.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.