Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries

Updated 14 January 2026
  • Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries are differences between electrons' and positrons' effective masses, probing violations of the Weak Equivalence Principle and CPT symmetry.
  • High-energy collider experiments and cosmological tests, including BBN, impose stringent bounds on these asymmetries via forbidden processes and modified dispersion relations.
  • Field-theoretic models with temperature-dependent CPT-violating effects show that mass asymmetries vanish at low temperatures while allowing keV-level gaps in the early universe.

Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries are experimentally constrained differences between the effective gravitational or inertial masses of the electron (ee^-) and positron (e+e^+), as well as between their fundamental dispersion relations at finite temperature or in the presence of external backgrounds. These asymmetries directly probe foundational principles such as the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), CPT symmetry, and extensions of General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory. Modern limits derive from both high-energy collider searches for forbidden processes and cosmological tests based on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), spanning laboratory and early-universe regimes. Field-theoretic models that permit electron-positron mass splitting have been developed, including temperature-dependent CPT-violating backgrounds with distinctive T2T^2 scaling. The anomalous mass difference, denoted Δmmeme+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+} (or, in the gravitational sector, Δmg\Delta m_g), is subject to stringent experimental and observational bounds.

1. Theoretical Framework

The WEP postulates equivalence between inertial mass mm and gravitational mass mgm_g for all particle species; General Relativity assumes m=mgm = m_g universally, with extensive experimental confirmation at low energies for normal matter. For antimatter, and in particular for electrons/positrons at relativistic energies, direct experimental confirmation is lacking. Violations of WEP permit mgmm_g \neq m for ee^- and e+e^+, resulting in modified dispersion relations in external gravitational potentials.

Deviations are parametrized via Δmmgm\Delta m \equiv m_g - m and expressed as a small expansion parameter κ2Φ(Δm/m)\kappa \equiv 2|\Phi| (\Delta m/m), where Φ\Phi is the gravitational potential. The background metric in weak-field approximation takes the form: ds2=H2dt2H2(dx2+dy2+dz2),H21+2Φds^2 = H^2 dt^2 - H^{-2} (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2), \quad H^2 \equiv 1 + 2\Phi For a test particle, the effective potential is Φm=Φ(mg/m)\Phi_m = \Phi \cdot (m_g / m), leading to the first-order dispersion relation

p(E)=E[1+2ΦΔmm]1m2E2p(\mathcal{E}) = \mathcal{E}\left[1 + 2|\Phi| \frac{\Delta m}{m}\right]\sqrt{1 - \frac{m^2}{\mathcal{E}^2}}

This formalism underpins indirect experimental bounds via high-energy processes (Kalaydzhyan, 2015).

Temperature-dependent CPT-violating backgrounds introduce further asymmetries. A universal CPT-violating parameter b0(T)=αT2b_0(T) = \alpha T^2 (with α\alpha of mass dimension 1-1) shifts the electron and positron masses: me(T)=m0+b0(T),me+(T)=m0b0(T),Δm(T)=2αT2m_e(T) = m_0 + b_0(T), \quad m_{e^+}(T) = m_0 - b_0(T), \quad \Delta m(T) = 2\alpha T^2 This allows for sizable early-universe mass gaps (\sim keV at TT \sim MeV) while automatically suppressing asymmetry at T0T \to 0 (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

2. Forbidden Processes and Experimental Constraints

High-energy collider experiments enable stringent indirect tests of mass asymmetry through kinematic investigations of forbidden processes:

  • Vacuum Cherenkov Radiation (e±e±γe^\pm \to e^\pm \gamma): If κ<0\kappa < 0, the electron (or positron) group velocity exceeds cc, enabling spontaneous emission of real photons in vacuum above energy threshold Eth=m/2κ\mathcal{E}_\text{th} = m / \sqrt{-2\kappa}. Absence of this process for e±e^\pm at $104.5$ GeV at LEP sets Eth>100\mathcal{E}_\text{th} > 100 GeV and thus κmin1.31×1011\kappa_\text{min} \simeq -1.31 \times 10^{-11}.
  • Photon Decay (γe+e\gamma \to e^+ e^-): For κ>0\kappa > 0, photon decay to e+ee^+ e^- becomes kinematically allowed above threshold ωth=2m2/κ\omega_\text{th} = \sqrt{2 m^2 / \kappa}. Non-observation for photons with ω>300\omega > 300 GeV at Tevatron implies κmax+5.80×1012\kappa_\text{max} \simeq +5.80 \times 10^{-12}.

Combining these with astrophysical potentials yields the key bounds (Kalaydzhyan, 2015):

Potential Choice Lower Bound Upper Bound mg/mm_g/m Bound
Sun's Potential (Φ\Phi_\odot) κmin=1.31×1011\kappa_\text{min} = -1.31 \times 10^{-11} κmax=+5.80×1012\kappa_\text{max} = +5.80 \times 10^{-12} 0.96<mg/m<1.040.96 < m_g/m < 1.04
Local Supercluster (ΦLS\Phi_\text{LS}) κmin=1.31×1011\kappa_\text{min} = -1.31 \times 10^{-11} κmax=+5.80×1012\kappa_\text{max} = +5.80 \times 10^{-12} 14×107<mg/m<1+2×1071 - 4\times10^{-7} < m_g/m < 1 + 2\times10^{-7}

A plausible implication is that antigravity-type scenarios (where antimatter is repelled by Earth) are excluded within these empirical limits.

3. Cosmological Tests: BBN Constraints

Early-universe electron-positron mass asymmetries are tightly constrained by their effects on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). The approach introduces: b0(T)=αT2,Δm(T)=2αT2b_0(T) = \alpha T^2, \quad \Delta m(T) = 2\alpha T^2 Modified dispersion relations impact several key steps:

  • Friedmann Equation: The Hubble rate H2=(8πG/3)ρtotH^2 = (8\pi G / 3) \rho_\text{tot} depends on separate electron and positron contributions with shifted masses.
  • Chemical Potential Evolution: Charge neutrality is enforced via

ne(me,μ,T)=ne+(me+,μ,T)n_{e^-}(m_e, \mu, T) = n_{e^+}(m_{e^+}, -\mu, T)

  • Weak Interactions: Neutron-proton conversion rates incorporate mem_e or me+m_{e^+}, modifying freeze-out conditions.
  • Nuclear Reaction Network: Observables YPY_P (Helium-4 fraction), D/HD/H (deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio), and NeffN_\text{eff} (effective relativistic degrees of freedom) are sensitive to Δm(T)\Delta m(T).

Numerical implementation is realized in the modified \texttt{PRyMordial} BBN code, with full finite-mass and chemical potential effects (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026). Linearized sensitivities are: ΔYPSYα,SY0.002\Delta Y_P \simeq S_Y \alpha, \quad S_Y \approx -0.002

Δ(D/H)SDα,SD+1.2×105\Delta(D/H) \simeq S_D \alpha, \quad S_D \approx +1.2 \times 10^{-5}

ΔNeffSNα,SN+0.02\Delta N_\text{eff} \simeq S_N \alpha, \quad S_N \approx +0.02

Observational constraints (2σ\sigma) lead to α1.1×106|\alpha| \lesssim 1.1 \times 10^{-6} GeV1^{-1}, Δm(1MeV)2.2|\Delta m (1\,\text{MeV})| \lesssim 2.2 keV.

4. Field-Theoretic Models for Mass Asymmetry

Explicit field-theoretic mechanisms for temperature-dependent electron-positron mass asymmetry with T2T^2 scaling have been constructed:

(a) Cubic Proca-Potential Model

A massive vector field BμB_\mu is introduced with the Lagrangian

L=14FμνFμνV(Bμ,T)+ψ(iγμμmψgBμγμγ5)ψ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu\nu} F_{\mu\nu} - V(B_\mu, T) + \overline{\psi}(i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m_\psi - g B_\mu \gamma^\mu \gamma^5)\psi

Analyzing the effective finite-TT potential: Veff(B0,T)=λ6B03+12cT2B02V_\text{eff}(B_0, T) = -\frac{\lambda}{6} B_0^3 + \frac{1}{2} c T^2 B_0^2 Minimization yields B0T2\langle B_0 \rangle \sim T^2 and thus mass asymmetry b0(T)=gB0T2b_0(T) = g \langle B_0 \rangle \propto T^2.

(b) Scalar-Vector EFT with Phase Transition

A real scalar ϕ\phi couples to the vector via

Vϕ=12μϕ2ϕ2+14λϕϕ412cϕT2ϕ2V_\phi = \frac{1}{2} \mu_\phi^2 \phi^2 + \frac{1}{4} \lambda_\phi \phi^4 - \frac{1}{2} c_\phi T^2 \phi^2

LκMϕ2uμBμ14λB(BμBμ)2\mathcal{L} \supset -\frac{\kappa}{M} \phi^2 u^\mu B_\mu - \frac{1}{4} \lambda_B (B_\mu B^\mu)^2

For T>Tcμϕ/cϕT > T_c \equiv \mu_\phi / \sqrt{c_\phi}, the induced vacuum expectation value gives B0T2\langle B_0 \rangle \propto T^2.

(c) PT-Symmetric Quantum-Mechanical Model

A non-Hermitian coordinate B0B_0 with PT-symmetric Hamiltonian: H=12p2iλB03+12cT2B02H = \frac{1}{2} p^2 - i \lambda B_0^3 + \frac{1}{2} c T^2 B_0^2 High-temperature thermal effective potential yields saddle-point B0T2\langle B_0 \rangle \sim T^2.

In all models, b0(T)b_0(T) naturally vanishes as T0T \to 0, ensuring restoration of CPT symmetry today.

5. Methodological Implementation and Computational Tools

Simulation of BBN with electron-positron mass asymmetries utilizes the public \texttt{PRyMordial} code, with key modifications:

  • Separate computation of electron/positron energy density and pressure for meme+m_e \neq m_{e^+}.
  • Dynamical solution of charge neutrality condition for μ(T)\mu(T).
  • Accurate weak npn \leftrightarrow p rates including radiative and finite-mass effects, using me(T),me+(T)m_e(T), m_{e^+}(T).
  • Incorporation of neutrino-electron collision terms with finite-mass corrections from the NUDEC_BSM_v2 tables, weighted by actual particle masses.
  • Rescaling of QED plasma corrections using meff=(me+me+)/2m_\text{eff} = (m_e + m_{e^+})/2.
  • Enforcement of standard atomic mass-excess benchmarks to maintain nuclear binding energy normalization.

This approach permits extraction of constraints on α\alpha and Δm(T)\Delta m(T) from observed YPY_P, D/HD/H, and NeffN_\text{eff} abundances (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

6. Implications, Limits, and Outlook

Current laboratory and cosmological data exclude large electron-positron mass asymmetries and antigravity scenarios at the levels probed. Collider bounds yield 0.96<mg/m<1.040.96 < m_g/m < 1.04 (solar potential) and 14×107<mg/m<1+2×1071-4\times10^{-7} < m_g/m < 1+2\times10^{-7} (Local Supercluster potential) (Kalaydzhyan, 2015). In the early universe, BBN measurements constrain potential CPT-violating mass asymmetries to Δm(T1MeV)\Delta m(T\sim 1\,\mathrm{MeV}) \lesssim 1.6--2.6 keV, depending on observable (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

A plausible implication is that any field-theoretic model aiming to explain observable effects via electron-positron mass splitting must satisfy stringent α\alpha bounds and vanish identically at laboratory temperatures. Complementary accelerator experiments at future facilities (ILC, CLIC) and precision cosmological surveys could further tighten constraints or uncover small violations. These tests probe both particle physics extensions and foundational principles in gravity and cosmology.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries.