Systematically Relate the Labovian Model to Discourse-Relation Frameworks in Japanese

Characterize the relationship between the Labovian model of narrative (including its micro-level clause types and six macro-structural functions) and discourse-relation frameworks such as Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT), and the Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) for Japanese by establishing a systematic mapping between Labovian categories and discourse relations.

Background

The paper notes parallels between the Labovian model and discourse-relation frameworks, highlighting, for example, the correspondence between the Labovian narrative clause and SDRT’s Narration relation. Despite the existence of Japanese discourse-relation corpora, the authors state that a systematic investigation of how Labovian categories align with discourse relations has not yet been conducted.

A systematic mapping would clarify theoretical correspondences and enable cross-framework interoperability for Japanese narrative analysis, potentially improving annotation consistency and facilitating tool development.

References

The Labovian model exhibits certain affinities with the discourse analysis frameworks discussed above. However, the relationship between these two models has not yet been systematically investigated.

Developing a Guideline for the Labovian-Structural Analysis of Oral Narratives in Japanese  (2603.29347 - Watahiki et al., 31 Mar 2026) in Related Work, Japanese Narrative Studies subsection