Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fate of Two-Particle Bound States in the Continuum in non-Hermitian Systems

Published 6 May 2024 in cond-mat.quant-gas | (2405.03168v2)

Abstract: We unveil the existence of two-particle bound state in the continuum (BIC) in a one-dimensional interacting nonreciprocal lattice with a generalized boundary condition. By applying the Bethe-ansatz method, we can exactly solve the wavefunction and eigenvalue of the bound state in the continuum band, which enable us to precisely determine the phase diagrams of BIC. Our results demonstrate that the non-reciprocal hopping can delocalize the bound state and thus shrink the region of BIC. By analyzing the wavefunction, we identify the existence of two types of BICs with different spatial distributions and analytically derive the corresponding threshold values for the breakdown of BICs. The BIC with similar properties is also found to exist in another system with an impurity potential.

Authors (2)
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper presents an exact Bethe-ansatz solution for the wave functions and eigenvalues of two-particle bound states in non-Hermitian systems.
  • It demonstrates how nonreciprocal hopping delocalizes bound states, reducing the region of bound states in the continuum (BIC).
  • Analytical phase diagrams and critical breakdown conditions are established, highlighting the interplay of nonreciprocity, interaction strength, and impurity effects.

Fate of Two-Particle Bound States in the Continuum in Non-Hermitian Systems

Introduction

The paper investigates the existence and characteristics of two-particle bound states in the continuum (BIC) within non-Hermitian systems, specifically in a one-dimensional nonreciprocal lattice with generalized boundary conditions (GBCs). Using the Bethe-ansatz method, the authors derive exact solutions for the wave functions and eigenvalues of these bound states, which facilitates a precise determination of their phase diagrams. A notable discovery is that nonreciprocal hopping can delocalize bound states, thereby reducing the BIC region. The authors classify two distinct types of BICs based on their spatial distributions and analytically determine the critical points for their breakdown.

Theoretical Model and Spectrum Analysis

The research employs a model of two interacting bosons in a nonreciprocal Hatano-Nelson lattice with GBCs or with an impurity potential. The Hamiltonian governing these systems is expressed as:

H^=∑x=−LM[−t(ega^x†a^x+1+e−ga^x+1†a^x)+U2a^x†a^x†a^xa^x]−γ(ega^0†a^1+e−ga^1†a^0)\hat{H} = \sum_{x=-L}^{M} \left[ -t\left(e^{g} \hat{a}_x^{\dag} \hat{a}_{x+1} + e^{-g} \hat{a}_{x+1}^{\dag} \hat{a}_x\right) + \frac{U}{2} \hat{a}_x^{\dag} \hat{a}_x^{\dag} \hat{a}_x \hat{a}_x \right] - \gamma \left( e^{g} \hat{a}_0^{\dag} \hat{a}_{1} + e^{-g} \hat{a}_{1}^{\dag} \hat{a}_0 \right)

The study reveals four complex continuum bands and bound states characterized by real eigenvalues. These are calculated for the Hatano-Nelson model considering imbalanced hopping amplitudes and interactions. The spectra analysis, shown in Figure 1, includes the real and imaginary components of the system's spectrum with particular parameters. The distribution of states within these bands is measured by the Fractal Dimension (FD), calculated using the inverse participation ratio (IPR). Figure 1

Figure 1: Schematics of the two-particle Hatano-Nelson model showing the real and imaginary parts of the spectra, with FDs of eigenstates.

Bethe-Ansatz Solution and Bound State Analysis

By applying a Bethe-ansatz type wave function, the paper rigorously derives the wave function for the BIC, expressed as:

ub(x1,x2)=e−g(x1+x2)ub,0(x1,x2)u_{b}(x_1,x_2) = e^{-g(x_1+x_2)} u_{b,0}(x_1,x_2)

where ub,0u_{b,0} follows a piecewise definition across coordinates (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2). This wave function accurately describes localized and delocalized states under nonreciprocal hopping, demonstrating two types of BICs. The parameter space for existence and behavior of these states is extensively explored, with Figure 2 illustrating the phase diagrams for various values of nonreciprocal hopping gg and interaction strengths. Figure 2

Figure 2: Phase diagrams illustrating regions A and B with different conditions on Eb1E_{b1} and Eb2E_{b2}.

Phase Diagram and Breakdown of BICs

The derived phase diagrams highlight regions where BICs persist under specific conditions of boundary strength γ\gamma, interaction strength UU, and the nonreciprocal hopping parameter gg. The boundaries of these regions are analytically determined, providing insight into the interplay between non-Hermitian and interaction-induced properties. The paper explicates threshold values of gg necessary for the breakdown of BICs. Figure 3

Figure 3: Density distribution of BICs for various gg values and parameters indicating delocalization trends.

Impurity Model and Generalized Findings

The phenomenon of BIC is further corroborated in a two-particle system with an impurity potential under periodic boundary conditions. The same analytical methods reveal similar BIC characteristics and elucidate competition mechanisms between interactions, impurity strength, and nonreciprocal hopping. The results show how BICs are affected by these factors through changes in wave function localization. Figure 4

Figure 4: Spectra and density distribution of BICs in a model with impurity potential.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive analytical exploration of BICs in the context of non-Hermitian systems, highlighting the influence of nonreciprocal hopping and interaction potentials. By deriving exact wave functions and phase diagrams, the paper significantly enhances the understanding of BIC phenomena, delineating conditions under which these states persist or vanish. These findings have broader ramifications for the study of non-Hermitian quantum systems and may inspire future research into multi-particle interactions and localized state engineering.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.