Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Likelihood Reward Redistribution

Published 20 Mar 2025 in cs.LG and cs.RO | (2503.17409v1)

Abstract: In many practical reinforcement learning scenarios, feedback is provided only at the end of a long horizon, leading to sparse and delayed rewards. Existing reward redistribution methods typically assume that per-step rewards are independent, thus overlooking interdependencies among state--action pairs. In this paper, we propose a \emph{Likelihood Reward Redistribution} (LRR) framework that addresses this issue by modeling each per-step reward with a parametric probability distribution whose parameters depend on the state--action pair. By maximizing the likelihood of the observed episodic return via a leave-one-out (LOO) strategy that leverages the entire trajectory, our framework inherently introduces an uncertainty regularization term into the surrogate objective. Moreover, we show that the conventional mean squared error (MSE) loss for reward redistribution emerges as a special case of our likelihood framework when the uncertainty is fixed under the Gaussian distribution. When integrated with an off-policy algorithm such as Soft Actor-Critic, LRR yields dense and informative reward signals, resulting in superior sample efficiency and policy performance on Box-2d and MuJoCo benchmarks.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a probabilistic reward redistribution framework that models per-step rewards as Gaussian random variables using a leave-one-out strategy.
  • It leverages maximum likelihood estimation to capture temporal dependencies and uncertainty in sparse, non-Markovian reward settings.
  • Experimental results on Box-2d and MuJoCo tasks show improved sample efficiency and policy performance compared to baseline methods.

Likelihood Reward Redistribution

The paper "Likelihood Reward Redistribution" introduces a probabilistic framework to address sparse and delayed rewards in reinforcement learning (RL), which is a common challenge across various applications. Unlike traditional methods that treat per-step rewards as isolated, the proposed approach models these rewards using parametric probability distributions whose parameters depend on the state-action pair. This method is aimed at improving the learning efficiency and policy performance by introducing uncertainty regularization and considering the interdependencies among state-action pairs.

Problem Formulation and Approach

Reward Redistribution

Reinforcement Learning often deals with environments where rewards are sparse, leading to inefficient learning processes. Typically, RL frameworks model environments using a Markov decision process (MDP) to learn optimal policies. However, when rewards are only provided at the end of an episode, this episodic setting complicates the learning due to the non-Markovian attributes of decision processes. The goal is then to transform episodic feedback into a dense reward signal through reward redistribution.

Previous methods aim to decompose episodic returns into per-step contributions, often ignoring temporal dependencies between state-action pairs. This paper proposes a new reward redistribution framework leveraging maximum likelihood estimations and modeling rewards as random variables to capture these dependencies. By adopting a leave-one-out (LOO) strategy, the framework accounts for the likelihood of observed returns while integrating an uncertainty regularization.

Likelihood-based Approach

The proposed Likelihood Reward Redistribution (LRR) employs a Gaussian model where each proxy reward is treated as a Gaussian random variable. In this framework, the per-step reward is associated with both a mean and a standard deviation, parameterized by a neural network. The negative log-likelihood of rewards, calculated via the LOO strategy across full trajectories, serves as the optimization objective. This LRR framework extends to non-Gaussian distributions, allowing for flexibility in handling real-world asymmetric reward distributions such as those observed in finance. Figure 1

Figure 1: A summary of Lag-1 Autocorrelation (ρ1\rho_1)

Implementation and Algorithm

The practical algorithm for implementing the Gaussian Reward Redistribution involves:

  1. Initializing model parameters and a replay buffer.
  2. Collecting trajectories and computing episodic rewards.
  3. In each update iteration, sampling a mini-batch from the replay buffer.
  4. Computing LOO rewards for each trajectory to capture interdependencies.
  5. Calculating the negative log-likelihood loss for Gaussian-distributed rewards and updating parameters via gradient descent.

This probabilistic reward model is seamlessly integrated with off-policy algorithms like Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), significantly enhancing sample efficiency and policy performance.

Experimental Evaluation

The LRR framework was evaluated on Box-2d and MuJoCo environments: Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Experimental results on Box-2d and MuJoCo tasks with high reward autocorrelation.

  • Overall Performance: The LRR consistently demonstrated superior performance compared to the randomized return decomposition (RRD) benchmark across tasks such as Hopper-v4, Humanoid-v4, and Walker-v4, which exhibit high lag-1 autocorrelation.
  • Temporal Correlations: The likelihood-based approach was shown to be particularly beneficial in environments with moderate to high temporal correlations, enhancing the ability of the model to capture complex interdependencies between actions and states over time.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a robust probabilistic framework for reward redistribution that addresses challenges in environments with sparse, non-Markovian rewards. By modeling per-step rewards as stochastic variables and leveraging a LOO strategy, the approach captures temporal dependencies, leading to improved learning efficiency and policy effectiveness. Future work could explore extensions to multi-agent scenarios and different noise distributions, enhancing the framework's adaptability across diverse RL environments.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.