Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

HAWK: A Hierarchical Workflow Framework for Multi-Agent Collaboration

Published 5 Jul 2025 in cs.AI and cs.MA | (2507.04067v1)

Abstract: Contemporary multi-agent systems encounter persistent challenges in cross-platform interoperability, dynamic task scheduling, and efficient resource sharing. Agents with heterogeneous implementations often lack standardized interfaces; collaboration frameworks remain brittle and hard to extend; scheduling policies are static; and inter-agent state synchronization is insufficient. We propose Hierarchical Agent Workflow (HAWK), a modular framework comprising five layers-User, Workflow, Operator, Agent, and Resource-and supported by sixteen standardized interfaces. HAWK delivers an end-to-end pipeline covering task parsing, workflow orchestration, intelligent scheduling, resource invocation, and data synchronization. At its core lies an adaptive scheduling and optimization module in the Workflow Layer, which harnesses real-time feedback and dynamic strategy adjustment to maximize utilization. The Resource Layer provides a unified abstraction over heterogeneous data sources, large models, physical devices, and third-party services&tools, simplifying cross-domain information retrieval. We demonstrate HAWK's scalability and effectiveness via CreAgentive, a multi-agent novel-generation prototype, which achieves marked gains in throughput, lowers invocation complexity, and improves system controllability. We also show how hybrid deployments of LLMs integrate seamlessly within HAWK, highlighting its flexibility. Finally, we outline future research avenues-hallucination mitigation, real-time performance tuning, and enhanced cross-domain adaptability-and survey prospective applications in healthcare, government, finance, and education.

Summary

  • The paper introduces the HAWK framework, a novel hierarchical approach that integrates layered agent workflows with 16 standardized interfaces for seamless collaboration.
  • The methodology emphasizes dynamic task scheduling and efficient resource sharing via a five-layered architecture applied in the CreAgentive prototype.
  • Performance evaluations indicate improved throughput, reduced complexity, and scalable integration across diverse multi-agent system applications.

HAWK: A Hierarchical Workflow Framework for Multi-Agent Collaboration

The paper introduces the Hierarchical Agent Workflow (HAWK) framework aimed at addressing key challenges within multi-agent systems (MAS), such as cross-platform interoperability, dynamic task scheduling, and efficient resource sharing. It is structured into five functional layers—User, Workflow, Operator, Agent, and Resource—and is distinguished by sixteen standardized interfaces to ensure modularity and flexibility.

Framework Overview

The HAWK framework encompasses all critical aspects of agent-based systems, from client-side workflow specification and submission through to task execution and resource provisioning. The multi-layer approach enhances scalability and allows for seamless integration with external systems, including hybrid deployments of LLMs. Figure 1

Figure 1: Framework of Hierarchical Agent WorKflow (HAWK)

Layers

  1. User Layer: Provides task submission interfaces and translates inputs for subsequent processing. It allows flexibility in user interface customization, thus promoting reuse across different scientific domains.
  2. Workflow Layer: Responsible for the orchestration and optimization of workflows based on parsed tasks received from the User Layer, emphasizing planning, execution, monitoring, and optimization.
  3. Operator Layer: Focuses on dynamic task scheduling and execution using six core modules: Environment, Memory, Task Management, Task Optimizer, Reasoning, and Security. These elements support efficient and secure agent operations.
  4. Agent Layer: Manages agent tasks related to Specification, Publication, Registration, and Discovery, enabling flexible deployment across diverse environments while maintaining overall scheduling strategy cohesion.
  5. Resource Layer: Supplies the Operator and Agent Layers with heterogeneous resources like data, models, physical devices, and third-party services, facilitating standardized resource invocation and cross-domain information retrieval.

Interfaces

HAWK defines 16 interfaces that standardize communication protocols within the framework, promoting interoperability and facilitating end-to-end coordination from user requests to agent collaboration. These interfaces ensure adaptability and extensibility across various application scenarios, such as resource access and task scheduling.

Implementation: CreAgentive

To validate the HAWK framework, the authors implemented CreAgentive, a multi-agent prototype for novel generation. It demonstrates HAWK's capabilities in orchestrating agents to produce structured narratives and showcases its flexibility and adaptability. Figure 2

Figure 2: The Workflow of the CreAgentive

CreAgentive Workflow

CreAgentive iteratively generates narrative content by coordinating agents through goal-driven stages, ensuring coherent story development. It employs long-term and short-term goals to guide agents in constructing narratives chapter by chapter.

Key Components

  • Environment Agent: Manages the evolving state of the story, enabling versioned context updates that maintain narrative traceability.
  • Decision Agent: Utilizes a dual-system cognitive framework to evaluate candidate storylines and select optimum trajectories.
  • Writer Agent: Transforms selected narrative plans into coherent chapters using LLMs.
  • Ending Determination Agent: Checks narrative progress against predefined endings, signaling workflow termination upon completion.

Performance Evaluation

The paper reports robust results in throughput improvement, invocation complexity reduction, and enhanced system controllability. It suggests future enhancements, like integration of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mechanisms and multi-modal collaboration protocols for effective cross-domain application.

Conclusion

HAWK offers a comprehensive and modular framework for MAS, addressing critical challenges inherent to agent coordination and resource orchestration. Its layered architecture supports seamless integration and evolution, empowering agents with adaptive scheduling and standardized resource access.

HAWK is poised for deployment across various domains, such as healthcare, government services, and finance, advancing the integration of intelligent AI entities into cross-sector applications. Considerable potential remains for further research in hallucination mitigation and real-time performance tuning to strengthen its applicability within complex environments.

In summary, the HAWK framework represents a foundational architecture capable of driving intelligent and synergistic multi-agent systems toward greater collaboration across diverse technological domains.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Glossary

  • Adaptive Scheduling: Real-time, context-aware adjustment of task allocation and execution strategies to maximize system performance. "Adaptive Scheduling: Intelligent Task Management, Reasoning, Optimization, and Security modules enable real-time, context-aware task allocation."
  • Agent-to-Agent communication (A2A): A protocol enabling direct, peer-to-peer negotiation and exchange between agents. "and Agent-to-Agent communication (A2A) \cite{google2025a2a} for peer-to-peer negotiation."
  • AGI: A hypothesized form of AI with general, human-level capabilities across diverse tasks. "As AI technology advances toward AGI, AI agents have found broad application across domains..."
  • Chain‑of‑thought (CoT): A prompting strategy encouraging stepwise reasoning to improve planning and problem-solving. "using a chain‑of‑thought (CoT) approach, it produces a chapter‑specific objective and refines this into a concrete, step‑by‑step plan."
  • Closed-logit LLM: A LLM interface that exposes only sampled outputs (not raw logits), often requiring alternative truth estimation. "while for a closed-logit LLM using mm sampled outputs:"
  • Cognitive–decision architecture: A structured model of decision-making that integrates cognitive reasoning components. "using a Teller‑inspired cognitive–decision architecture \cite{liu-etal-2024-teller}"
  • Conjunctive clauses: Logical constructs formed by the conjunction (AND) of atoms within a DNF reasoning layer. "The DNF layer constructs CC conjunctive clauses:"
  • Cross-platform adaptation layer: An architectural component that allows workflows or agents to run across different ecosystems without reimplementation. "but it lacks a cross-platform adaptation layer"
  • Decision Agent: A specialized agent that evaluates candidate trajectories and selects the optimal plot or plan. "The pool of candidate trajectories is passed to the Decision Agent, which, using a Teller‑inspired cognitive–decision architecture..."
  • Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF): A logical form consisting of disjunctions (OR) of conjunctions (AND) used for interpretable reasoning. "this agent integrates a differentiable Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) reasoning layer to evaluate and rank alternative candidate storylines."
  • Environment Agent: An agent responsible for maintaining, updating, and versioning the world state in the workflow. "Environment Agent: Responsible for maintaining the story’s evolving world state, this agent handles the storage, retrieval, and versioned updating of all environment-related data."
  • Governance mechanisms: Standardized operations for managing agent lifecycle and collaboration (e.g., specification, publication, registration, discovery). "Implement Specification, Publication, Registration, Discovery four Agent governance mechanisms"
  • Graph‑based workflow management: Modeling workflows as graphs to capture dependencies and execution order among nodes. "LangGraph \cite{duan2024langgraph_crewai} utilizes a graph‑based workflow management approach that enables flexible modeling of inter‑agent dependencies"
  • Hallucination mitigation: Strategies to reduce or prevent erroneous outputs from LLMs that can disrupt workflows. "we outline future research avenues—hallucination mitigation, real‑time performance tuning, and enhanced cross‑domain adaptability"
  • HAWK: The Hierarchical Agent WorKflow framework that structures multi-agent collaboration across layered modules and standardized interfaces. "We propose Hierarchical Agent Workflow (HAWK), a modular framework comprising five layers—User, Workflow, Operator, Agent, and Resource—and supported by sixteen standardized interfaces."
  • Hybrid deployments: Combining multiple LLMs or models within a single system to leverage their complementary strengths. "We also show how hybrid deployments of LLMs integrate seamlessly within HAWK"
  • Message-Centric Protocol (MCP): An industry protocol emphasizing loose coupling among components via message-based interfaces. "including the Message-Centric Protocol (MCP) \cite{anthropic2024mcp} for loose coupling"
  • Multi-agent systems (MAS): Systems composed of multiple interacting agents that coordinate to achieve complex goals. "as with other multi‑agent systems (MAS) reported in the literature \cite{cemri2025multiagentllmsystemsfail}"
  • Multi-modal collaboration protocol: A communication layer enabling agents to collaborate using diverse modalities (e.g., text, images, devices). "Leveraging a multi-modal collaboration protocol, HAWK enables cross-domain synergy"
  • Open-logit LLM: A LLM interface that provides raw logits for outputs, enabling direct computation of truth values. "Specifically, for an open-logit LLM, truth values are computed as:"
  • Predicate: A logical statement evaluated as true/false (or in a continuous truth space) used within reasoning layers. "For each predicate PiP_i, the truth value of its kk-th logic atom is represented as μi,k[1,1]\mu_{i,k} \in [-1,1]"
  • Resource Layer: The foundational layer abstracting heterogeneous data, models, tools, and devices via unified interfaces. "The Resource Layer, positioned on the right side of the framework, serves as the fundamental support layer for the multi-agent workflow system"
  • Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): A technique combining external retrieval with generation to improve accuracy and grounding. "seamless integration with a variety of communication protocols and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks"
  • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Formalized, repeatable processes used to guide agent tasks and task decomposition. "MetaGPT \cite{hong2023metagpt}, which leverages standard operating procedures (SOPs) and a task‑decomposition mechanism"
  • Task decomposition: Breaking complex tasks into smaller, manageable subtasks to facilitate planning and execution. "such as task decomposition, temporal arrangement, and dependency resolution"
  • Task Optimizer: A module that dynamically adjusts execution strategies based on policies and available resources. "Task Optimizer, which dynamically adjusts execution strategies based on policies and available resources"
  • Task scheduling: Assigning tasks to agents or resources over time, often under constraints, to optimize performance. "Contemporary multi-agent systems encounter persistent challenges in ... dynamic task scheduling"
  • Teller dual-system cognitive architecture: A cognitive framework combining fast and slow reasoning systems for decision-making. "Building on the Teller dual-system cognitive architecture \cite{liu-etal-2024-teller}, this agent integrates a differentiable Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) reasoning layer"
  • Unified resource abstraction: A common interface and representation for diverse resources to simplify invocation and integration. "through a unified resource access and abstraction mechanism, the Resource Layer delivers standardized interfaces"
  • Versioned State Update: A controlled update process that assigns version tags to environment and memory states for traceability. "Versioned State Update: Upon completing a chapter, the system updates and assigns version tags to both the environment state and character memories"
  • Workflow Engine: The central component that selects workflow models, orchestrates execution, and coordinates modules. "The Wrkflow Engine selects appropriate workflow models based on task requirements and exposes interfaces to the underlying Operator Layer"
  • Workflow Monitoring: Continuous tracking of execution state and performance metrics for analysis and optimization. "Interface I\textsubscript{4} defines the communication protocol between the Workflow Engine and the Workflow Monitoring, enabling real-time reporting of execution states and key performance metrics"
  • Workflow Optimizer: A component that uses feedback to adapt workflow structures and scheduling strategies for better throughput. "Interface I\textsubscript{2} defines the communication protocol between the Workflow Optimizer and the Workflow Engine, enabling the optimizer to receive real-time feedback ... and to dynamically adjust workflow structures and task scheduling strategies."
  • Workflow Planner: A planning module handling task breakdown, timing, and dependency resolution before execution. "Interface I\textsubscript{3} defines the communication protocol between the Workflow Engine and the Workflow Planner, through which the engine delegates planning-related responsibilities—such as task decomposition, temporal arrangement, and dependency resolution—to the planner."
  • Workflow orchestration: Coordinating tasks, agents, and resources to realize a complete, coherent workflow. "HAWK delivers an end‑to‑end pipeline covering task parsing, workflow orchestration, intelligent scheduling, resource invocation, and data synchronization."

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.